12.07.2015 Views

Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks

Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks

Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

134 <strong>Wireless</strong> <strong>Ad</strong> <strong>Hoc</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Sensor</strong> <strong>Networks</strong>Example 3.6.3: Extended TopologyWe also test our scheme’s performance with multiple bottlenecks, usingthe extended topology of Figure 3.19. We use the following traffic sources:3 VBR traffic sources <strong>and</strong> 3 CBR traffic sources introduced in Case II.Source rates are adjusted using the feedback, uk ( ), separately. The bottleneckbuffer size is taken at 50 packets. For results that are included inFigure 3.29, congestion was created by reducing the b<strong>and</strong>width of differentLinks as follows:B<strong>and</strong>width of Link0 = 10 to 4 Mbps,B<strong>and</strong>width of Link1 = 10 to 3 Mbps,B<strong>and</strong>width of Link2 = 10 to 2 Mbps,B<strong>and</strong>width of Link3 = 10 to 1 Mbps,t = 3 sec;t = 6 sec;t = 24 sec;t = 27 sec.From Figure 3.29, we can see once again that the PLR obtained usingTQ congestion control scheme is much better than the New-Reno TCPcongestion control scheme because, in the proposed scheme, mathematicalanalysis ensures the convergence <strong>and</strong> the performance of the scheme. Infact, the PLR using TQ congestion control scheme is equal to zero whilethe transmission delay time is smaller. This is due to the fact that our10.75TQTCPPower0.50.2500 510 15 20 25 30 35Time:(s)40 45 50FIGURE 3.29PLR with time for extended topology.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!