12.07.2015 Views

Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks

Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks

Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

188 <strong>Wireless</strong> <strong>Ad</strong> <strong>Hoc</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Sensor</strong> <strong>Networks</strong>5.2.3.2 Bounded Power OvershootThe following theorem proves that the transmitter power of active linksis finite <strong>and</strong> can only increase in small increments while accommodatingthe new links that are trying to gain admission into the network.THEOREM 5.2.4For any fixed η i ∈( 1, ∞),we have Pi( l+ 1) ≤ β( l) Pi(),l where β( l)is a positivenumber for every l ∈{ 0, 1, 2 , …}<strong>and</strong> every i ∈ A l under the DPC/SSCD orDPC/optimal updating scheme.PROOF By definition, i ∈ A l implies that Ri() l ≥ γ i,usingPi( l+ 1) = Ri( l+1)Ii( l), where Ii() Pi() ll = ; substituting in Pl we getRi() li ( ) Ri( l+1)+ 1 = . PlR l i ( ), pi()i( l+ 1)=[( 1− ki) Ri( l) + kiγi + ηi]. Pl i( ). This further implies that Pl whereR () li( + 1) ≤ β( lPl ) i(),β( l)iγiηiis a positive number given by β() l = ( 1− ki) + ki Rwhere >() l+ R () lγi iminRi() l < ( γ i + ηi).This clearly shows that the overshoots of the DPC/ALPscheme are bounded by β . The value of β lies betweenβmin< β < βmaxwhere is slightly larger than 1. Therefore, the powers of active linkscan only increase smoothly to accommodate the new links that are poweringin the channel.β minη i ∈ ∞THEOREM 5.2.5 (NONACTIVE LINK SIR INCREASES)For any fixed ( 1, ), we have Ri() l ≤ Ri( l+1)for every l ∈{ 012… , , , } <strong>and</strong>every i ∈ B l , in the set of fully admissible inactive links under the DPC/SSCDor DPC/optimal scheme.PROOF Applying the proposed DPC vi() l =− kx i i()l +ηiinto SIR Equation5.10 to get Ri( l+ 1) = Ri( l) − kx i i()l + η i = Ri() l + ki( γ i − Ri()) l + ηi.Thevalue ( γ i − R i ( l))is a positive number for a nonactive link in the set offully admissible inactive links. Therefore, this implies that R( l+ 1) ≥R( l).iiTHEOREM 5.2.6 (NONACTIVE LINK INTERFERENCE DECREASES)For any fixed η ∈( 1, ∞),we have Ii( l+ 1) ≤ Ii( l)for every l ∈{ 0, 1, 2 , …}<strong>and</strong>every i ∈ B l , the set of inactive links which are fully admissible, under the DPC/SSCD or DPC/optimal scheme.PROOF From Theorem 5.2.5, for nonactive links we have Ri( l+ 1) ≥Ri( l).Pi( l+1)Pi() lThis can equivalently be represented as ≥ . From Theorem 5.2.4, weIi( l+ 1)Ii() lhave Pi( l+ 1) ≤ β( l) Pi()l for all inactive links. Using this condition in the previoustheorem results in Ri( l+ 1) ≥Ri( l)because β( lPlI ) i() i() l≥ PlI i() i( l+1)⇒ Ii( l+ 1) ≤β( l) Ii().lTHEOREM 5.2.7 (FINITE ADMISSION TIME)For i ∈ , each inactive link becomes active if at all admitted in a finite time.B l

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!