12.07.2015 Views

Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks

Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks

Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Optimized Energy <strong>and</strong> Delay-Based Routing 383<strong>Sensor</strong> nodes play the dual role of data collection <strong>and</strong> routing <strong>and</strong> thereforeneed energy to perform. Malfunctioning of a few nodes, due tohardware or lack of energy, in the network will cause significant topologychanges, leading to greater consumption of energy <strong>and</strong> rerouting of packets.Therefore, energy efficient schemes <strong>and</strong> communication protocols arebeing designed for WSNs.One of the requirements for a protocol is scalability, meaning that theaddition of more nodes to the existing network should not affect thefunctionality of the network with the protocol. Therefore, the communicationprotocols for the WSNs should take into consideration their limitedresources such as battery power, memory, <strong>and</strong> b<strong>and</strong>width, <strong>and</strong> be able tofunction in the face of topology changes due to node mobility as well asguaranteeing scalability.Available routing protocols for sensor networks are classified as datacentric,location based, quality of service (QoS) aware, <strong>and</strong> hierarchicalprotocols. Data-centric protocols (Esler et al. 1999) such as SPIN (Heizelmanet al. 1999), directed diffusion (Intanagonwiwat et al. 2003), <strong>and</strong> GRAB(Ye et al. 2003, 2005) consolidate redundant data when routing from sourceto destination. Location-based routing protocols such as GPSR (Hill et al.2000), GEAR (Zhang et al. 2004), <strong>and</strong> TTDD (Luo et al. 2002) require GPSsignals to determine an optimal path so that the flooding of routingrelatedcontrol packets is not necessary. From Chapter 1, sensor nodes arenot supposed to have GPS devices <strong>and</strong> therefore such protocols havelimited use. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, QoS aware protocols such as SPEED(He et al. 2003) address various requirements such as energy efficiency,reliability, <strong>and</strong> real-time requirements. Finally, the hierarchical protocolssuch as LEACH (Heinzelman et al. 2002), TEEN (Manjeshwar et al.2001), APTEEN (Manjeshwar et al. 2002), <strong>and</strong> PEGASIS (Lindsey <strong>and</strong>Raghavendra 2002) form clusters <strong>and</strong> CHs to minimize the energy consumptionboth for processing <strong>and</strong> transmission of data.In LEACH, the CH function is rotated among the nodes to reduce theenergy consumption because only the CHs communicate to the BS eventhough the placements of CHs are not uniform. Nodes in TEEN <strong>and</strong>APTEEN are designed to respond to sudden changes in the sensedattribute when the attribute exceeds a user-defined threshold. On the otherh<strong>and</strong>, PEGASIS is a chain-based protocol in which rather than multipleCH sending data, only one node in the chain is selected to transmit to theBS. LEACH, TEEN, APTEEN, <strong>and</strong> PEGASIS assume that the position ofthe BS is fixed <strong>and</strong> every node in the sensor network can directly communicateto it. This assumption is not always valid in larger networks,because the BS could be out of range with some of the CHs making amultihop routing protocol a necessity.AODV is an on-dem<strong>and</strong> routing protocol that discovers routes on an“as-needed” basis for wireless ad hoc networks. It uses traditional routing

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!