12.07.2015 Views

Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks

Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks

Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

396 <strong>Wireless</strong> <strong>Ad</strong> <strong>Hoc</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Sensor</strong> <strong>Networks</strong>distance from the CH to the BS. When calculating the link_cost_ factor,available energy is divided by distance <strong>and</strong> average E2E delay, to ensurethat the selected nodes are in range with the CHs <strong>and</strong> close to the BS.This helps minimize the number of MPR nodes in the network.THEOREM 8.8.2OEDSR protocol results in an optimal route (the path with the maximum energy,minimum average E2E delay, <strong>and</strong> minimum distance from the BS) between theCHs <strong>and</strong> any source destination.8.9 Performance EvaluationThe OEDSR algorithm is implemented in GloMoSim as a new routingprotocol. Simulations are performed by varying node mobility <strong>and</strong> numberof network nodes. <strong>Ad</strong>ditionally, the nodes are made mobile. It isimportant to notice that the OEDSR cannot be directly compared withother hierarchical routing protocols such as LEACH, TEEN, APTEEN, <strong>and</strong>PEGASIS as these protocols assume that every node is in direct rangewith the BS <strong>and</strong>, if that is not the case, each node sends a high-powersignal to the BS so that information can be transmitted using one hop.Therefore, OEDR, AODV, DSR, <strong>and</strong> Bellman Ford’s routing protocol areused for comparison because they use multiple RNs to route informationwhen the BS is not in direct range to a given network node.The total energy consumed <strong>and</strong> the average E2E delay from a CH tothe BS is minimized by OEDSR <strong>and</strong>, therefore, those two metrics areconsidered for the analysis. <strong>Ad</strong>ditionally, the energy available times theaverage E2E delay metric served as a more precise overall metric tocompare the performance of different routing protocols. In Figure 8.25,different network sizes are simulated for the same CH (shown in green)<strong>and</strong> the same BS (shown in red). It can be seen that when the number ofnodes in the network increases, the OEDSR protocol ensures that theoptimum path is selected for routing the information by selecting theappropriate RNs, which are shown as blue stars. First, the case wherenodes are stationary is discussed.Example 8.9.1: Stationary NodesIt is assumed that the network has stationary nodes that are r<strong>and</strong>omlyplaced on the surface of a structure to monitor incipient faults <strong>and</strong> otherfaulty events. The simulation was run for networks with 40, 50, 70, 100,<strong>and</strong> 150 nodes, r<strong>and</strong>omly distributed in an area of size 2000 × 2000 m.Parameters that were used for this simulation include a packet size of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!