Precipitation-Runoff and Streamflow-Routing Models for the ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Figure 9. Location of Precipitation-Runoff Modeling System calibration basins, Willamette River Basin, Oregon.26
Table 10. Additional distributed and nondistributed Precipitation-Runoff Modeling System calibration parameter values[ o F, degrees Fahrenheit; o C, degrees Celsius; HRU, hydrologic response unit]___________________________________________________________________________________Parameter Units Description Value___________________________________________________________________________________ARSA Inches Minimum snowfall, in water equivalent, needed to reset snow albedo during 0.05the snowpack accumulation stageARSM Inches Minimum snowfall, in water equivalent, needed to reset snow albedo during .20the snowpack melt stageBST o F or o C Temperature below which precipitation is snow and above which it is rain 32CTW Coefficient for computing snowpack sublimation from PET .50DENI Decimal Initial density of new-fallen snow (decimal fraction) .10DENMX Decimal Average maximum density of snowpack (decimal fraction) .60EAIR Emissivity of air on days without precipitation .85FWCAP Decimal Free water holding capacity of snowpack (fraction of snowpack water equivalent) .05GW Acre-inches Storage in each ground-water reservoir 1.13PARS Decimal Correction factor for computed solar radiation on summer day with precipitation .44(decimal fraction)PARW Decimal Correction factor for computed solar radiation on winter day with precipitation .50(decimal fraction)RDB Coefficient used in sky cover—solar radiation relation .40RDMX Percent Maximum percent of potential solar radiation (decimal fraction) .80RDP Coefficient used in sky cover—solar radiation relation .61RES Acre-inches Storage in each subsurface reservoir .50RESMX Coefficient for routing water from each subsurface reservoir to ground-water reservoir 1.00REXP Coefficient for routing water from each subsurface reservoir to ground-water reservoir 1.00RMXA Decimal Proportion of rain in precipitation above which snow albedo is not reset for .80snowpack accumulation stageRMXM Decimal Proportion of rain in precipitation above which snow albedo is not reset for .60snowpack melt stageSCN Acres Minimum contributing area for surface runoff when ISSR1 = 0; coefficient in .001contributing area—soil moisture index relation when SSR1 = 1SCX Decimal Maximum possible contributing area for surface runoff as proportion of each .01hydrologic-response unitSC1 Coefficient in surface runoff contributing area—soil moisture index relation .20SETCON Snowpack settlement time constant .10SRX Inches Maximum daily snowmelt infiltration capacity of soil profile at field capacity 2.00for each HRUTRNCF Transmission coefficient for shortwave radiation through vegetation canopy .50for each HRU___________________________________________________________________________________optimized together. For most basins, the coefficientof determination increased by about 10 percent, anderror decreased as a result of optimization. The absolutedifference between the observed and simulateddischarge was used as the optimization objective function.Simulation ResultsThe final statistical results of both calibrationand verification for the 10 basins are shown in table11. Simulation results from the Butte Creek Basin(located in the Molalla River Basin) showed the highestcalibration coefficient of determination for the calibrationperiod (0.93) and also the lowest absolute error(18.22 percent). As an example of simulation resultscompared to observations, figure 10 shows theobserved and simulated discharge for Butte Creek.Lookout Creek and Thomas Creek Basins were themost difficult basins to calibrate, which is shown bytheir respective coefficients of determination: 0.69 and0.73. The lower correlation between simulated andobserved values for Lookout Creek can be attributedto inadequate precipitation data coverage for the basinand its location in the snow zone of the McKenzieRiver Basin. This lower correlation of high flowsprobably can be expected for high-elevation locations,where data typically are lacking on precipitation type,27
Page 1: Precipitation-Runoff and Streamflow
Page 4 and 5: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIORBRUC
Page 6 and 7: Determining Travel Time and Dilutio
Page 8 and 9: 2. Stream-gaging stations used to c
Page 10 and 11: Page Intentionally Blank
Page 12 and 13: network-routing models where availa
Page 14 and 15: made on the main stem at base-flow
Page 16 and 17: Figure 1. Willamette River Basin, O
Page 18 and 19: EvapotranspirationINPUTSAirtemperat
Page 20 and 21: Table 1. Climate stations used to c
Page 22 and 23: Table 2. Stream-gaging stations use
Page 24 and 25: Figure 4. Mean annual precipitation
Page 26 and 27: Major Land Use MapHydrologic Soil G
Page 28 and 29: 0.5 mi 2 , created in the merge of
Page 30 and 31: Table 6. Geology and soils matrix o
Page 32 and 33: tion value of the HRU class by the
Page 34 and 35: Table 8. Selected monthly basinwide
Page 38 and 39: Table 11. Statistical analyses of P
Page 40 and 41: flow can become a significant compo
Page 42 and 43: diffusion at selected grid interval
Page 44 and 45: samples were collected at various d
Page 46 and 47: 3,0002,500June 21-30, 1993September
Page 48 and 49: stream network is shown on figure 1
Page 50 and 51: 122˚30´ 15´122˚00´121˚45´Roc
Page 52 and 53: 123˚22´30´´ 123˚15´ 123˚00´
Page 54 and 55: 123˚00´´ 45´30´122˚15´45˚15
Page 56 and 57: YamhillRiver123˚45´ 30´ 15´123
Page 58 and 59: 123˚07´30´´ 123˚00´ 45´ 30´
Page 60 and 61: 123˚07´30´´ 123˚00´ 45´ 30´
Page 62 and 63: 44˚15´14166000122˚07´30´´Will
Page 64 and 65: 122˚15´ 122˚00´121˚52´30´´4
Page 66 and 67: 44˚52´30´´45´122˚15´ 122˚00
Page 68 and 69: observed flow at the Willamette Riv
Page 70 and 71: DAFLOW model, and peak amplitude is
Page 72 and 73: 20DYE CONCENTRATION, IN MICROGRAMS
Page 74 and 75: ARC-INFO and Geographic Information
Page 76 and 77: WILL.WDMData-base file(Observed pre
Page 78 and 79: WILL.WDMData-base fileSWSTATSFreque
Page 80 and 81: Jobson, H.E., 1980, Comment on A ne
Page 82 and 83: Page Intentionally Blank
Page 84 and 85: APPENDIX 1. STREAM GEOMETRY FOR MAI
Page 86 and 87:
APPENDIX 1. STREAM GEOMETRY FOR MAI
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
APPENDIX 2. ARC MACRO LANGUAGE (AML
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
APPENDIX 3. DEFINITIONS OF PARAMETE
Page 124 and 125:
APPENDIX 3. DEFINITIONS OF PARAMETE
Page 126 and 127:
APPENDIX 4. MEASUREMENTS USED TO DE
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
APPENDIX 5. EXAMPLE PRECIPITATION-R
Page 136 and 137:
APPENDIX 5. EXAMPLE PRECIPITATION-R
Page 138 and 139:
APPENDIX 6. DIFFUSION ANALOGY FLOW
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
APPENDIX 7. PROGRAMMING STEPS TO IN
Page 152 and 153:
APPENDIX 8. PROGRAMMING STEPS TO DE
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
150Climatemaxtempmintempprecipitati
Page 162 and 163:
APPENDIX 10. DIRECTORY TREE AND DES
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172 and 173:
Page 174 and 175:
Page 176 and 177:
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180 and 181:
APPENDIX 11. DIRECTORY TREES AND DE
Page 182 and 183:
APPENDIX 11. DIRECTORY TREES AND DE
Page 184 and 185:
APPENDIX 12. DIRECTORY FOR will.wdm
Page 186 and 187:
Page 188 and 189:
Page 190 and 191:
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
Page 196 and 197:
APPENDIX 13. PROGRAMMING STEPS FOR
Page 198 and 199:
Page 200 and 201:
Page 202 and 203:
APPENDIX 14. INPUT FILES FOR BRANCH
Page 204 and 205:
Page 206 and 207:
show all

Precipitation-Runoff and Streamflow-Routing Models for the ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?