Here - Stuff

REFERENCESAagaard, B. T., J. F. Hall, and T. H. Heaton (2004). Effects of fault dipand slip rake angles on near-source ground motions: Why rupturedirectivity was minimal in the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquake.Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 94, 155–170.Abrahamson, N. A., and P. G. Somerville (1996). Effects of the hangingwall and footwall on ground motions recorded during theNorthridge earthquake. Bulletin of the Seismological Society ofAmerica 86, S93–99.Aoi, S., T. Kunugi, and H. Fujiwara (2008). Trampoline effect in extremeground motion. Science 322, 727–730.Beavan, J., E. J. Fielding, M. Motagh, S. Samsonov, and N. Donnelly(2011). Fault location and slip distribution of the 22 February 2011M W 6.2 Christchurch, New Zealand, earthquake from geodeticdata. Seismological Research Letters 82, 789–799.Bommer, J. J., and A. Martinez-Pereira (1999). The effective duration ofearthquake strong motion. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 3,127–172.Bozorgnia, Y., and K. W. Campbell (2004). The vertical-to-horizontalresponse spectral ratio and tentative procedures for developingsimplified V/H and vertical design spectra. Journal of EarthquakeEngineering 8, 175–207.Bradley, B. A. (2010). NZ-specific Pseudo-spectral Acceleration GroundMotion Prediction Equations Based on Foreign Models. Departmentof Civil and Natural Resources Engineering, University ofCanterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand, 324 pp.Brown, L. J., and J. H. Weeber (1992). Geology of the Christchurch UrbanArea. Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences map. LowerHutt, New Zealand: GNS Science.Chiou, B., R. Darragh, N. Gregor, and W. J. Silva (2008). NGA projectstrong-motion database. Earthquake Spectra 24, 23–44.Chiou, B. S. J., and R. R. Youngs (2008). An NGA model for the averagehorizontal component of peak ground motion and response spectra.Earthquake Spectra 24, 173–215.Choi, Y., J. P. Stewart, and R. W. Graves (2005). Empirical model forbasin effects accounts for basin depth and source location. Bulletinof the Seismological Society of America 95, 1,412–1,427.Cubrinovski, M., J. D. Bray, M. Taylor, S. Giorgini, B. A. Bradley, L.Wotherspoon, and J. Zupan (2011). Soil liquefaction effects in thecentral business district during the February 2011 Christchurchearthquake. Seismological Research Letters 82, 893–904.Cubrinovski, M., R. A. Green, J. Allen, S. A. Ashford, E. Bowman, B. A.Bradley, B. Cox, T. C. Hutchinson, E. Kavazanjian, R. P. Orense,M. Pender, M. Quigley, and L. Wotherspoon (2010). Geotechnicalreconnaissance of the 2010 Darfield (Canterbury) earthquake.Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering 43,243–320.DeMets, C., R. G. Gordon, D. F. Argus, and S. Stein (1994). Effect ofrecent revisions to the geomagnetic time scale on estimates of currentplate motion. Geophysical Research Letters 21, 2,191–2,194.Douglas, J., and D. Boore (2010). High-frequency filtering of strongmotionrecords. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 9(2): 395–409.Graizer, V. M. (2005). Effect of tilt on strong motion data processing.Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 25, 197–204.New Zealand Police (2011). Christchurch earthquake: List of deceased;http://www.police.govt.nz/list-deceased. Last accessed June 20,2011.New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering (NZSEE) (2010).Preliminary observations of the 2010 Darfield (Canterbury)Earthquakes. Special issue, Bulletin of the New Zealand Society forEarthquake Engineering 43, 215–439.Shahi, S. K., and J. W. Baker (2011). An empirically calibrated frameworkfor including the effects of near-fault directivity in probabilisticseismic hazard analysis. Bulletin of the Seismological Society ofAmerica 101, 742–755.Silva, W. J. (1997). Characteristics of vertical strong ground motionsfor applications to engineering design. In Proceedings of theFHWA/NCEER Workshop on the National Representation ofSeismic Ground Motion for New and Existing Highway Facilities,Burlingame, CA. Technical Report NCEER-97-0010. Buffalo, NY:National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research.Standards New Zealand Standards (2004). Structural Design Actions,Part 5: Earthquake Actions—New Zealand. Wellington, NewZealand: Standards New Zealand, 82 pp.Somerville, P. G., K. Ikikura, R. W. Graves, S. Sawada, D. Wald, N. A.Abrahamson, Y. Iwasaki, T. Kagawa, N. Smith, and A. Kowada(1999). Characterizing crustal earthquake slip models for the predictionof strong ground motion. Seismological Research Letters 70,59–80.Stirling, M. W., M. Gerstenberger, N. Litchfield, G. H. McVerry, W. D.Smith, J. R. Pettinga, and P. Barnes (2007). Updated ProbabilisticSeismic Hazard Assessment for the Canterbury Region. GNS ScienceConsultancy Report 2007/232, ECan Report Number U06/6,58 pp.Sutherland, R., K. Berryman, and R. Norris (2006). Quaternary sliprate and geomorphology of the Alpine fault: Implications for kinematicsand seismic hazard in southwest New Zealand. GeologicalSociety of America Bulletin 118, 464–474.Yamada, M., J. Mori, and T. Heaton (2009). The slapdown phase in highaccelerationrecords of large earthquakes. Seismological ResearchLetters 80, 559–564.Zhao, J. X., and M. Gerstenberger (2010). Attenuation Models for RapidPost Earthquake Assessment in New Zealand. Wellington, NewZealand: Earthquake Commission New Zealand report.Department of Civil and Natural Resources EngineeringUniversity of CanterburyPrivate Bag 4800Christchurch, New Zealandbrendon.bradley@canterbury.ac.nz(B A. B.)Seismological Research Letters Volume 82, Number 6 November/December 2011 865