12.07.2015 Views

Here - Stuff

Here - Stuff

Here - Stuff

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

(A) (B) (C)Crack▲▲Figure 13. Town Hall auditorium and adjacent dining facility undergoing significant liquefaction-induced differential settlement andlateral movements (24 March 2011; S43.52727 E172.63521).(A)(B)(C)▲ ▲ Figure 14. Building in area of significant liquefaction that displays negligible to minor differential settlement or punching settlement(24 March 2011; S43.526508 E172.634646).Air bridges connect the complex to the Crowne Plaza, a majorhotel, and to the Christchurch Convention Centre (opened1997) to the north. Tiled paved steps lead from the southernside of the complex down to the river’s edge, with fountainsand views across to Victoria Park.The facility suffered extensive damage caused primarilyby liquefaction-induced ground failure. Differential settlements,caused by punching shear beneath the building’s maininternal columns that surround the auditorium and carry thelargest dead loads to shallow foundations and a second ringof exterior columns (Figure 13A) that are connected to theinner ring via beams (Figure 13B), caused distortion to thestructure. The cracked beam shown in Figure 13B underwentan angular distortion of 1/70 across its span. The seating forthe auditorium has been tilted and dragged backward due tothe settlement of the surrounding columns. Additionally,the floor of the auditorium is now domed due to differentialuplift relative to the columns. The air bridge connecting themain auditorium to the Christchurch Convention Centre tothe north (away from river) has separated from the building.With no significant deformations of the ground as the obvioussource of this lengthening between the two buildings, theexplanation appears to be that distortions to the auditoriumstructure have pulled the outer walls in toward the building,creating this separation. The entire complex appears to havemoved laterally toward the river (albeit by a barely perceptibleamount on the northern side) with parts of the complex closestto the river undergoing increasingly larger movements (Figure13C). These sections have settled and moved laterally towardthe river more than the remainder of the building, leading tosignificant structural deformations where the extension andoriginal structures are joined.Contrary to the liquefaction-induced punching settlementof buildings into the surrounding ground that wasobserved at the Town Hall and in other parts of the CBD,the seven-story building shown in Figure 14A did not punchsignificantly into the liquefied ground nor undergo significantdifferential settlement. As shown in Figure 14B therewere significant amounts of sand ejecta observed in this area.However, there was no obvious evidence of significant differentialground or building movement (Figure 14C). The differentialsettlement measured between adjacent columns wastypically negligible, but differential settlements of up to 3.5cm were measured at a few locations. This building is acrossthe street and slightly to the west of the Town Hall. It is a case902 Seismological Research Letters Volume 82, Number 6 November/December 2011

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!