Coming in BSSAIssue 101:6 of the Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, expected publication December 2011, will present the followingarticles. indicates that online material will be available at the SSA Web site.ARTICLESOn the Probability of Detecting PicoseismicityKatrin Plenkers, Danijel Schorlemmer, Grzegorz Kwiatek, andthe JAQUARS groupSource Parameters of Picoseismicity Recorded atMponeng Deep Gold Mine, South Africa: Implications forScaling RelationsG. Kwiatek, K. Plenkers, G. Dresen, and the JAGUARSResearch GroupMonitoring the Earthquake Source Process in NorthAmericaR.B. Herrmann, H. Benz, and C. J. AmmonInvestigating the Distributions of Differences betweenMainshock and Foreshock MagnitudesChristine Smyth, Jim Mori, and Masumi YamadaResolution of Seismic-Moment Tensor Inversions from aSingle Array of ReceiversIsmael Vera Rodriguez, Yu J. Gu, and Mauricio D. SacchiMagnitude-Scaling Rate in Ground Motion PredictionEquations for Response Spectra from Large, ShallowCrustal EarthquakesJohn Zhao and Ming LuStatistical Analysis of the 2002 M w 7.9 Denali EarthquakeAftershock SequencePathikrit Bhattacharya, Mary Phan, and Robert ShcherbakovMoment-Constrained Finite-Fault Analysis UsingTeleseismic P waves: Mexico Subduction ZoneC. Mendoza, S. Castro Torres, and J. M. Gomez GonzalezCalifornia Integrated Seismic Network (CISN) LocalMagnitude Determination in California and VicinityR. A. Uhrhammer, M. Hellweg, K. Hutton, P. Lombard, A. W.Walters, E. Hauksson, and D. OppenheimerQuantifying a Potential Bias in Probabilistic SeismicHazard Assessment: Seismotectonic Zonation WithFractal PropertiesMatteo Spada, Stefan Wiemer, and Eduard KisslingEpistemic Uncertainty in the Location and Magnitude ofEarthquakes in Italy from Macroseismic DataW. H. Bakun, A. Gómez Capera, and M. StucchiPreliminary Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis of theCO2CRC Otway Project Site, Victoria, AustraliaMark Stirling, Nicola Litchfield, Matthew Gerstenberger, DanClark, Brendon Bradley, John Beavan, Graeme McVerry, RussVan Dissen, Andy Nicol, Laura Wallace, and Robert BuxtonImprovements to Seismic Monitoring of the EuropeanArctic Using Three-Component Array Processing at SPITSS. J. Gibbons, J. Schweitzer, F. Ringdal, T. Kværna, S. Mykkeltveit,and B. PaulsenRecurrent Morphogenic Earthquakes in the PastMillennium along the Strike-Slip Yushu Fault, CentralTibetan PlateauAiming Lin, Dong Jia, Gang Rao, Bing Yan, Xiaojun Wu, andZhikun RenIntegration of Paleoseismic Data from Multiple Sites toDevelop an Objective Earthquake Chronology:Application to the Weber Segment of the Wasatch FaultZone, UtahChristopher B. DuRoss, Stephen F. Personius, Anthony J.Crone, Susan S. Olig, and William R. LundThe Crustal and Upper-Mantle Structures beneath theNortheastern Margin of TibetXuzhang Shen, Xiuping Mei, and Yuansheng ZhangCrustal Structure in the Southern Appalachians:A Comparison of Results Obtained from Broadband Dataand Three-Component, Wide-Angle P and S ReflectionDataM. Scott Baker and Robert B. HawmanStripping Analysis of Ps-Converted Wave PolarizationAnisotropyHitoshi OdaUpper-Crust Shear-Wave Velocity of South KoreaConstrained by Explosion and Earthquake DataHeeok Jung, Yong-seok Jang, and Bong Gon JoThe Green’s Functions Constructed from 17 Years ofAmbient Seismic Noise Recorded at Ten Stations of theGerman Regional Seismic NetworkDanuta Garus and Ulrich WeglerScattered P′P′ Waves Observed at Short DistancesPaul S. Earle, Sebastian Rost, Peter M. Shearer, and ChristineThomas968 Seismological Research Letters Volume 82, Number 6 November/December 2011 doi: 10.1785/gssrl.82.6.968
Verification of a Spectral-Element Method Code for theSouthern California Earthquake Center LOH.3Viscoelastic CaseFlorent De MartinApplication of the Nearly Perfectly Matched Layer toSeismic-Wave Propagation Modeling in ElasticAnisotropic MediaJingyi Chen and Jianguo ZhaoComparison of the Empirical Green’s Spatial DerivativeMethod and Empirical Green’s Function MethodMichihiro Ohori and Yoshiaki HisadaApplication of the Multichannel Wiener Filter toRegional Event Detection Using NORSAR Seismic-ArrayDataJ. Wang, J. Schweitzer, F. Tilmann, R. S. White, and H. SoosaluScattering and Attenuation of Seismic Waves inNortheastern North AmericaR.D. Cicerone, C.G. Doll Jr., and M. N. ToksözReal-Time Strong-Motion Broadband Displacementsfrom Collocated GPS and AccelerometersYehuda Bock, Diego Melgar, and Brendan W. CrowellAnalysis of the Origins of κ (Kappa) to Compute HardRock to Rock Adjustment Factors for GMPEsChris Van Houtte, Stéphane Drouet, and Fabrice CottonComparison of Site Periods Derived from DifferentEvaluation MethodsD. Motazedian, K. Khaheshi Banab, J. A. Hunter, S. Sivathayalan,H. Crow, and G. BrooksA Stochastic Approach for Evaluating the NonlinearDynamics of Vertical Motion Recorded at the IWTH25Site for the 2008 M w 6.9 Iwate–Miyagi Inland EarthquakeShigeo KinoshitaComparison of Nonlinear Structural Responses forAccelerograms Simulated from the Stochastic Finite-Fault Approach versus the Hybrid Broadband ApproachGail M. Atkinson, Katsuichiro Goda, and Karen AssatouriansNear-Field Response of a 1D-Structure Alluvial SiteDenis Sandron, Livio Sirovich, and Franco PettenatiA Predictive Equation for the Vertical-to-Horizontal Ratioof Ground Motion at Rock Sites Based on Shear-WaveVelocity Profiles from Japan and SwitzerlandBenjamin Edwards, Valerio Poggi, and Donat FähEmpirical Distance Attenuation and the Local MagnitudeScale for Northwest IranMehdi Rezapour and Reza RezaeiForearc versus Backarc Attenuation of EarthquakeGround MotionHadi Ghofrani and Gail AtkinsonRegional Correlations of V S30 and Velocities AveragedOver Depths Less Than and Greater Than 30 MetersDavid M. Boore, Eric M. Thompson, and Héloïse CadetSHORT NOTESNear-Surface Expression of Early-to-Late HoloceneDisplacement along the Northeastern Himalayan FrontalThrust at Marbang Korong Creek, Arunachal Pradesh,IndiaR. Jayangondaperumal, Steven G. Wesnousky, and Barun K.ChoudhuriThe 16 May 1909 Northern Great Plains EarthquakeW. H. Bakun, M. C. Stickney, and G. C. RogersLocation of Aftershocks of the 4 April, 2010 M w 7.2El Mayor–Cucapah Earthquake of Baja California,MexicoRaúl R. Castro, José G. Acosta, Víctor M. Wong, Arturo Pérez-Vertti, Antonio Mendoza, and Luis InzunzaNonvolcanic Tremor in the Aleutian ArcC. L. Peterson, S. R. McNutt, and D. H. ChristensenA New Empirical Magnitude Scaling Relation forSwitzerlandBettina P. Goertz-Allmann, Benjamin Edwards, Falko Bethmann,Nicholas Deichmann, John Clinton, Donat Fäh, andDomenico GiardiniDetermination of Love- and Rayleigh-Wave Magnitudesfor Earthquakes and ExplosionsJessie L. Bonner, Anastasia Stroujkova, and Dale AndersonInversion of Ground-Motion Data from a SeismometerArray for Rotation Using a Modification of Jeager’sMethodWu-Cheng Chi, W. H. K. Lee, J. A. D. Aston, C. J. Lin, andC. C. LiuSite Effects in Unstable Rock Slopes: Dynamic Behaviorof the Randa Instability (Switzerland)Jeffrey R. Moore, Valentin Gischig, Jan Burjanek, Simon Loew,and Donat FähSeismological Research Letters Volume 82, Number 6 November/December 2011 969
- Page 1:
Volume 82, Number 6 November/Decemb
- Page 7:
News and Notes (continued)Nominatio
- Page 11:
Preface to the Focused Issue on the
- Page 14 and 15:
TABLE 1Peak ground acceleration (PG
- Page 16 and 17:
▲▲Figure 2. A) Sketch of the
- Page 18 and 19:
▲▲Figure 4. A) Adopted moment r
- Page 20 and 21:
▲▲Figure 7. As in Figure 6 but
- Page 22 and 23:
▲ ▲ Figure 8. Misfit parameters
- Page 24 and 25:
▲ ▲ Figure 10. Spatial variabil
- Page 26 and 27:
▲ ▲ Figure 12. Standard spectra
- Page 28 and 29:
Quigley, M., R. Van Dissen, P. Vill
- Page 30 and 31:
slip on a 59-degree striking fault
- Page 32 and 33:
▲▲Figure 4. Convergence of inve
- Page 34 and 35:
observations and other source studi
- Page 36 and 37:
-42. 5-43. 0-43. 5-44. 0-44. 5-43.2
- Page 38 and 39:
“Product CSK © ASI, (ItalianSpac
- Page 40 and 41:
TABLE 2Solutions for fault location
- Page 42 and 43:
-43.45(A)degrees N-43.50-43.552.52.
- Page 44 and 45:
is still a good fit to the horizont
- Page 46 and 47:
Coulomb Stress Change Sensitivity d
- Page 48 and 49:
mation takes on a larger strike-sli
- Page 50 and 51:
P 9.4267BLDU45P 20.1213CASY39P 2.62
- Page 52 and 53:
ERMJNUMAJOINUJHJ2CBIJMIDWJOWYHNBTPU
- Page 54 and 55:
(A)6.146.13(B)6.246.36Misfit6.156.1
- Page 56 and 57:
(A)(B)(C)(D)▲▲Figure 10. The co
- Page 58 and 59:
(A)(B)(C)(D)▲▲Figure 12. The co
- Page 60 and 61:
Luo, Y., Y. Tan, S. Wei, D. Helmber
- Page 62 and 63:
−44˚00' −43˚00'4-Sep-2010Mw 7
- Page 64 and 65:
TABLE 1Pairs of SAR imagery used in
- Page 67 and 68:
Depth (km)Coulomb Stress Change(bar
- Page 69 and 70:
Crippen, R. E. (1992). Measurement
- Page 71 and 72:
AlpineFaultHope Fault38 mm/yr0+ +-1
- Page 73 and 74:
σ 1dσ 3Nuσ 3CM w 7.1dw 6.2u70°M
- Page 75 and 76:
Right-lateral Faults(A) Range Front
- Page 77 and 78:
DISCUSSIONThe 2010-2011 Canterbury
- Page 79 and 80:
Large Apparent Stresses from the Ca
- Page 81 and 82:
▲ ▲ Figure 2. Observed vs. pred
- Page 83 and 84:
10Obs SA(1s)AS1AS+SDAB 2006AB+SDSA(
- Page 85 and 86:
Fine-scale Relocation of Aftershock
- Page 87 and 88:
−43.25°OXZ0 10 20km−43.5°−4
- Page 89 and 90:
A’0 km 4 8−43.5°B’B−43.6°
- Page 91 and 92:
REFERENCESAvery, H. R., J. B. Berri
- Page 93 and 94:
▲ ▲ Figure 2. A) shows three-co
- Page 95 and 96:
▲ ▲ Figure 4. Vertical accelera
- Page 97 and 98:
0.8PRPC Z0.40Normalized (Max PGA +
- Page 99 and 100:
Near-source Strong Ground MotionsOb
- Page 101 and 102:
(A)Magnitude, M w876542009 NZdataba
- Page 103 and 104:
Scale0.5 g5 seconds▲▲Figure 4.
- Page 105 and 106:
(A)(B)Spectral Acc, Sa (g)North/Wes
- Page 107 and 108:
Vertical-to-horizontal PGA ratio543
- Page 109 and 110:
(A)(B)Station:CCCCSolid:AvgHorizDas
- Page 111 and 112:
REFERENCESAagaard, B. T., J. F. Hal
- Page 113 and 114:
▲ ▲ Figure 1. Shear-wave veloci
- Page 115 and 116:
Spectral Acceleration (0.3 s), (g)I
- Page 117 and 118:
Spectral Acceleration (3 s), (g)In[
- Page 119 and 120:
TABLE 1Mean (μ LLH ) and standard
- Page 121 and 122:
Strong Ground Motions and Damage Co
- Page 123 and 124:
ings and the Modified Takeda-Slip M
- Page 125 and 126:
high, but there were no buildings d
- Page 127 and 128:
REFERENCES▲▲Figure 8. Heavily d
- Page 129 and 130:
(A)(B)(C)(D)(E)▲▲Figure 1. A) M
- Page 131 and 132:
(A) (B) (C)▲ ▲ Figure 3. A) Typ
- Page 133 and 134:
(A) (B) (C)▲ ▲ Figure 4. A) Typ
- Page 135 and 136:
Case StudyKey ParametersTABLE 1Key
- Page 137 and 138:
▲ ▲ Figure 9. Representative bu
- Page 139 and 140:
Soil Liquefaction Effects in the Ce
- Page 141 and 142:
▲ ▲ Figure 2. Representative su
- Page 143 and 144:
Location of structures illustrated
- Page 145 and 146:
Shading indicates areaover which pr
- Page 147 and 148:
1.8 deg15 cmGround cracking due to
- Page 149 and 150:
30 cm17 cm30 cmFoundation beam▲
- Page 151 and 152:
Comparison of Liquefaction Features
- Page 153 and 154:
(A)(B)▲▲Figure 2. A) Simplified
- Page 155 and 156:
(A)Acceleration (Gal)6004002000-200
- Page 157 and 158:
(A)(B)▲▲Figure 7. Distribution
- Page 159 and 160:
(A)(B)▲▲Figure 10. Damage to a
- Page 161 and 162:
(A)(B)▲ ▲ Figure 14. A) Subside
- Page 163 and 164: ▲▲Figure 17. A trench in a resi
- Page 165 and 166: Ambient Noise Measurements followin
- Page 167 and 168: ▲▲Figure 1. Location of the noi
- Page 169 and 170: ▲▲Figure 5. Site N20 showing HV
- Page 171 and 172: ▲▲Figure 8. Comparison between
- Page 173 and 174: Use of DCP and SASW Tests to Evalua
- Page 175 and 176: ▲ ▲ Figure 2. Aerial image of C
- Page 177 and 178: (A)(B)▲▲Figure 4. DCP test bein
- Page 179 and 180: ▲▲Figure 7. SASW setup at a sit
- Page 181 and 182: where X ~ N(μ X , σ X 2 ) is shor
- Page 183 and 184: Using the same critical layers as s
- Page 185 and 186: Performance of Levees (Stopbanks) d
- Page 187 and 188: ▲▲Figure 3. Typical geometry an
- Page 189 and 190: TABLE 1Damage severity categories (
- Page 191 and 192: (A)(B)▲▲Figure 6. A) Large sand
- Page 193 and 194: (A)(B)▲▲Figure 8. A) Representa
- Page 195 and 196: each of the Waimakariri River and a
- Page 197 and 198: ▲ ▲ Figure 2. Horizontal peak g
- Page 199 and 200: only minor damage, mostly to their
- Page 201 and 202: (A)(C)(B)▲▲Figure 5. Ferrymead
- Page 203 and 204: (A)(B)▲▲Figure 7. Damage to sou
- Page 205 and 206: (A)(B)▲▲Figure 11. Settlement o
- Page 207 and 208: (A)(C)(B)▲▲Figure 14. Railway B
- Page 209 and 210: Events Reconnaissance (GEER) Associ
- Page 211 and 212: New PublicationsCanGeoRefThe Americ
- Page 213: Wednesday, 18 AprilTechnical Sessio
- Page 217 and 218: EASTERN SECTIONRESEARCH LETTERSReas
- Page 219 and 220: (A)70°N100°W 60°W70°N(B)100°E1
- Page 221 and 222: Mongolia SCRThe presence or absence
- Page 223 and 224: the small horizontal relative motio
- Page 225 and 226: 80°100°120°140°EXPLANATIONBorde
- Page 227 and 228: Chang, K. H. (1997). Korean peninsu
- Page 229 and 230: Wheeler, R. L. (2008). Paleoseismic
- Page 231 and 232: A significant outcome of this study
- Page 233 and 234: TABLE 1 (continued)Earthquakes for
- Page 235 and 236: ▲▲Figure 2. Earthquakes used in
- Page 237 and 238: Meeting CalendarM E E T I N GC A L
- Page 239 and 240: 201 Plaza Professional Bldg. • El
- Page 241 and 242: Seismological Research Letters (SRL
- Page 243 and 244: Christa von Hillebrandt-Andrade, Pr