12.07.2015 Views

Fraser River Sockeye Fisheries and Fisheries Management - Cohen ...

Fraser River Sockeye Fisheries and Fisheries Management - Cohen ...

Fraser River Sockeye Fisheries and Fisheries Management - Cohen ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

survey 20 times, 19 of the survey results would be within this confidence interval. Inother words, there is a 1 in 20 (5%) chance that the survey result will be outside the 95%confidence interval (e.g., the 2010 sockeye return was above the upper limit of the 95%confidence interval).For the purpose of this report:Precision of the methods <strong>and</strong> estimates will be assessed within years by examining thesize of confidence intervals associated with the resulting estimates. Where possible, weprovide the 95% confidence intervals expressed as a percentage of the estimate(e.g. ± 10%).The term “reliability” is often used to combine both precision <strong>and</strong> accuracy. In someinstances, we may not be able to quantify accuracy or precision but there may besufficient information to indicate whether or not an estimate is reliable. For example, thecatch estimates that are based on m<strong>and</strong>atory reporting in log books or at l<strong>and</strong>ing sites canbe evaluated in terms of compliance with these m<strong>and</strong>atory reporting requirements. Ifmost fishers report their catch <strong>and</strong> the portion of active fishers reporting is known, theestimates would be highly reliable. With regard to escapement, where the “actual”number of spawners is never known, reliability is typically used as a relative term. Themost reliable estimates are those derived from counting fences or rigorous mark-recaptureprograms whereas unreliable estimates are derived from visual surveys where waterclarity is poor or effort is insufficient to cover the spawning grounds or spawning period.For the purpose of this report:Reliability of the methods will be qualitatively assessed on a relative basis (e.g., MethodA is more reliable than Method B).Reliability of the estimates will also be qualitatively assessed on a relative basis usingavailable information on the application of method (e.g., we assess whether the surveyeffort was sufficiently large in scope to produce a reliable estimate).Our evaluations of the pre-season <strong>and</strong> in-season run size forecasting methods used for<strong>Fraser</strong> <strong>and</strong> Bristol Bay sockeye stocks included more quantitative assessments of theaccuracy, precision, <strong>and</strong> reliability of the forecasts. Additional clarification of theseterms are found under the relevant headings.16

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!