12.07.2015 Views

Fraser River Sockeye Fisheries and Fisheries Management - Cohen ...

Fraser River Sockeye Fisheries and Fisheries Management - Cohen ...

Fraser River Sockeye Fisheries and Fisheries Management - Cohen ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

FISHERIES HARVESTINGOverview of <strong>Fisheries</strong><strong>Fraser</strong> sockeye are harvested at numerous points along their return migration pathbetween Alaska <strong>and</strong> spawning areas in the upper <strong>Fraser</strong> watershed (Figure 1, Figure 2).Given the diversity of <strong>Fraser</strong> sockeye stocks, virtually all of the harvests are classified as“mixed-stock” fisheries.Table 1 provides the annual estimates of the number of <strong>Fraser</strong> sockeye harvested by eachof the three major fishing sectors in Canada (First Nations, commercial, <strong>and</strong> recreational)<strong>and</strong> two distinct fishing areas in the US (Washington <strong>and</strong> Alaska). These catch estimateswere extracted from PSC annual reports because these reports are the only publishedsource of catch estimates for <strong>Fraser</strong> sockeye. Table 2 provides a summary of ourqualitative ratings for accuracy, precision, <strong>and</strong> reliability of the data used to generate thecatch estimates for the majority of the sockeye harvested in each fishery. For example, ifcatch estimates for seines were rated “Good” <strong>and</strong> seines catch the majority of thesockeye, the overall rating will be “Good” for that fishery. A quantitative assessment ofaccuracy was not possible because the true catch values are not known. Similarly, therewas insufficient information to quantitatively assess the precision of catch estimates. ForTable 2 <strong>and</strong> other similar summary tables in the report, we used the following qualitativeratingscales for our evaluations of data quality:Accuracy = the degree managers can be confident that the reported catch reflectsthe actual harvest (“Fair” = likely biased low in some or most years; “Good” =any bias is likely to be small; “Very Good” = complete enumeration of the catch).Precision = generally unknown for most fisheries, estimates of precision areprovided where available <strong>and</strong> where catch estimates are a complete count, theprecision rating was “High”).Reliability = the degree managers can rely on the catch estimates for in-season<strong>and</strong> post-season assessments. These ratings are similar to the ratings for accuracyexcept biased estimates that received a “Fair” rating for accuracy could receive a“Medium” rating for reliability if the direction of the bias is known.Since 2001, the overall ratings for <strong>Fraser</strong> sockeye catch estimates were: “Good” foraccuracy, “Unknown” for precision, <strong>and</strong> “Medium” for reliability (Table 2). The catch17

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!