12.07.2015 Views

Fraser River Sockeye Fisheries and Fisheries Management - Cohen ...

Fraser River Sockeye Fisheries and Fisheries Management - Cohen ...

Fraser River Sockeye Fisheries and Fisheries Management - Cohen ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Alternative escapement estimation MethodsVirtually every type of enumeration method used to estimate escapement for salmon hasbeen used in the <strong>Fraser</strong> watershed for <strong>Fraser</strong> sockeye. A wide variety of hydroacousticsystems <strong>and</strong> test fisheries have been tested <strong>and</strong> used in the lower <strong>Fraser</strong> <strong>River</strong> to estimatethe escapement from marine fisheries (Appendix J). The advances in hydroacoustictechnology in the 1990s led to substantial changes <strong>and</strong> significant improvements in themethods used at the Mission hydroacoustic site between 2004 <strong>and</strong> 2010. The PSCSouthern Endowment Fund has supported studies to evaluate new hydroacoustic systems<strong>and</strong> other methods for estimating sockeye escapement to the lower <strong>Fraser</strong> <strong>River</strong>.The 2007-2010 <strong>Fraser</strong> fishwheels <strong>and</strong> telemetry studies (Robichaud et al. 2008; 2010;Smith et al. 2009) tested several methods similar to those used successfully on the lowerNass <strong>River</strong> to enumerate escapements of sockeye, Chinook, coho <strong>and</strong> steelhead (Link <strong>and</strong>English 1996; Alex<strong>and</strong>er et al. 2002). Fishwheels were tested at the two best sitesdownstream of Mission throughout the sockeye migration period under a widely varyingriver flow <strong>and</strong> abundances of other co-migrating salmon species. Conventional externaltags (spaghetti tags) were applied to all sockeye <strong>and</strong> Chinook salmon caught by thefishwheels in 2007 <strong>and</strong> 2008 <strong>and</strong> upstream fisheries were sampled for mark-rateinformation. These assessments clearly indicated the portion of the run that could becaptured by fishwheels <strong>and</strong> sampled for mark-rates by in-river fisheries was too low toprovide reliable estimates of lower river escapement for <strong>Fraser</strong> sockeye (Robichaud et al.2008; Smith et al. 2009). In 2009, the focus of the fishwheel studies shifted towardsobtaining near-shore samples of species composition <strong>and</strong> providing sockeye for radiotelemetrystudies designed to assess the magnitude <strong>and</strong> location of en-route losses. ThePSC Mission hydroacoustic estimates were split into near-shore (within 50 m of eachriver bank) <strong>and</strong> off-shore strata (>50 meters from each river bank). The speciescomposition of the Crescent Isl<strong>and</strong> fishwheels <strong>and</strong> the Whonnock gillnets were applied tothe near-shore <strong>and</strong> off-shore counts, respectively, to derive daily estimates of the numberof sockeye passing Mission; results were consistent with the PSC’s ‘best judgement’ inseasonsockeye abundance estimates. This method, combined with DIDSONhydroacoustic estimates for near-shore areas in September 2009, provided daily estimatesof the number of Chinook <strong>and</strong> pink salmon passing Mission that were consistent with thepre-season expectations <strong>and</strong> post-season escapement estimates for these species(Robichaud et al. 2010).Capture <strong>and</strong> assessment methods for other fish such as fences, traps <strong>and</strong> tower counts arenot feasible or suitable for the lower <strong>Fraser</strong> <strong>River</strong>. The lower <strong>Fraser</strong> <strong>River</strong> is more than500 m at the majority of sites below Mission <strong>and</strong> river discharges can exceed 10,00096

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!