12.07.2015 Views

surveying iii (topographic and geodetic surveys) - Modern Prepper

surveying iii (topographic and geodetic surveys) - Modern Prepper

surveying iii (topographic and geodetic surveys) - Modern Prepper

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

important in evaluating the overall adequacy of the observed network. Other statistics (such as chisquare,confidence levels, or histograms) are usually not significant for lower-order engineering projects,<strong>and</strong> become totally insignificant if the user is not well versed in statistics <strong>and</strong> adjustment theory. Use ofthese statistics to reject data (or report the results of an adjustment) without underst<strong>and</strong>ing theirderivation <strong>and</strong> source within the network adjustment is not advised.d. Relative-distance <strong>and</strong> positional accuracy estimates resulting from the free adjustment of a GPSnetwork are usually excellent in comparison to conventional <strong>surveying</strong> methods. Loop misclosures <strong>and</strong>relative-distance accuracies between points commonly exceed 1:100,000.e. Relative distance accuracy estimates between points in a network are determined by errorpropagation in the positional st<strong>and</strong>ard errors at each end of the tie. Relative-accuracy estimates may bederived for resultant distances or azimuths between the points. The relative-distance accuracy estimatesare those typically used to assess the free <strong>and</strong> constrained accuracy classifications, expressed as a ratio(such as 1:80,000). Since each point in the network has particular position variances, the relativedistanceaccuracy propagated between any two points will also vary throughout the network.f. The minimum value (or the largest ratio) will govern the relative accuracy of the overall project.This minimum value (from a free adjustment) is compared with the intended relative-accuracyclassification of the project to evaluate compliance. However, relative-distance accuracy estimatesshould not be rigidly evaluated over short lines (less than 500 meters). Depending on the size <strong>and</strong>complexity of the project, large variances in the propagated relative-distance accuracies can result.When a constrained adjustment is performed, the adequacy of the external fixed stations will have amajor impact on the resultant, propagated distance-accuracies, especially when connections are made toweak control systems. Properly weighted, partially constrained adjustments will usually improve thepropagated distance accuracies.g. The primary criteria for assessing the adequacy of a particular GPS-S is based on the relativedistanceaccuracy results from a minimally constrained free adjustment, not a fully constrainedadjustment. This is due to the difficulty in assessing the adequacy of the surrounding network. If thepropagated relative accuracies fall below the specified level, reobservation is warranted.h. Most adjustment software will output the residual corrections to each observed baseline vectorcomponent. These residuals indicate the amount by which each segment was corrected in theadjustment. A least squares adjustment minimizes the sum of the squares of these baseline residualcorrections. Commercial least squares adjustment software packages are available. These softwarepackages adjust GPS networks using st<strong>and</strong>ard PCs. Sample adjustment statistics summaries from thesoftware package used by Army <strong>topographic</strong> surveyors are shown in Figure 5-8, page 5-50.EN0593 5-48

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!