Research resourcesWe encourage o<strong>the</strong>r national governments <strong>to</strong> follow this lead<strong>and</strong> fund a broad portfolio of research in this area. Somecountries are already supporting <strong>the</strong>ir scientists <strong>to</strong> research <strong>the</strong>male reproductive system <strong>and</strong> develop methods <strong>to</strong> regulatemale fertility, but governments need <strong>to</strong> do more in terms offunding, networking, partnering <strong>and</strong> political support. It is nowclearly apparent that only through <strong>the</strong> combined efforts ofscientists, not-for-profit research organizations, governments<strong>and</strong> international organizations will <strong>the</strong> hope of greater access<strong>to</strong> family planning through delivery of methods for men <strong>to</strong> usebe realized. We are strongly committed <strong>to</strong> this goal <strong>and</strong>encourage greater public-sec<strong>to</strong>r involvement <strong>and</strong> investment inthis important area of research. ❏The author is a staff member of <strong>the</strong> World HealthOrganization. The author alone is responsible for <strong>the</strong> viewsexpressed in this publication <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>y do not necessarilyrepresent <strong>the</strong> decisions or <strong>the</strong> stated policy of <strong>the</strong> World HealthOrganization.Kirsten M Vogelsong is a scientist in <strong>the</strong> Department ofReproductive Health <strong>and</strong> Research at <strong>the</strong> World Health Organizationin Geneva, Switzerl<strong>and</strong>. She manages a portfolio of activities related<strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> research <strong>and</strong> development of new methods of contraception,with a focus on male sexual <strong>and</strong> reproductive <strong>health</strong> <strong>and</strong> fertilityregulation. Dr Vogelsong received a BA degree from Penn State <strong>and</strong>a PhD in Neurobiology <strong>and</strong> Physiology from Northwestern University.She has previously worked in academic research labora<strong>to</strong>ries <strong>and</strong> inproject management at <strong>the</strong> United States Agency for InternationalDevelopment’s Office of Population.Henry L Gabelnick is <strong>the</strong> Executive Direc<strong>to</strong>r of CONRAD <strong>and</strong> alsoa professor in <strong>the</strong> Department of Obstetrics <strong>and</strong> Gynaecology atEastern Virginia Medical School. CONRAD has as its mission <strong>the</strong>improvement of reproductive <strong>health</strong> with emphasis on developingcountries. Dr Gabelnick received BS <strong>and</strong> MS degrees from MIT <strong>and</strong>his PhD from Prince<strong>to</strong>n University. He currently is <strong>the</strong> President of<strong>the</strong> Society for <strong>the</strong> Advancement of Reproductive Care. He has alsoserved on <strong>the</strong> boards of <strong>the</strong> Alliance for Microbicide Development,Biosyn, Inc. <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> International Partnership for Microbicides.Eberhard Nieschlag is currently President of <strong>the</strong> German Societyof Andrology. Following his studies of Medicine in Bonn <strong>and</strong> Munich<strong>and</strong> Biochemistry in London, Professor Nieschlag worked at variousdepartments of Internal Medicine of University Hospitals in Germany<strong>and</strong> at <strong>the</strong> Reproduction Research Branch at <strong>the</strong> NIH in Be<strong>the</strong>sda.He is specialized in internal medicine, endocrinology <strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong>rology.He was Direc<strong>to</strong>r of <strong>the</strong> Max-Planck Clinical Research Unit forReproductive Medicine at <strong>the</strong> University of Muenster from 1980 <strong>to</strong>1988 <strong>and</strong> has since <strong>the</strong>n been Direc<strong>to</strong>r of <strong>the</strong> Institute ofReproductive Medicine of <strong>the</strong> University of Münster, which is a longst<strong>and</strong>ingWHO Collaborating Centre for Research in MaleReproduction <strong>and</strong> a training centre of <strong>the</strong> European Academy ofAndrology. For many years, Professor Nieschlag was a member of <strong>the</strong>WHO Steering Committee for <strong>the</strong> Regulation of Male Fertility <strong>and</strong>was its Chairman from 1985 <strong>to</strong> 1990. He was President of <strong>the</strong>German Society of Endocrinology, <strong>the</strong> International Society ofAndrology, <strong>the</strong> European Academy of Andrology <strong>the</strong> German Societyfor Reproductive Medicine. The most recent of <strong>the</strong> many awardsProfessor Nieschlag received is <strong>the</strong> Distinguished Andrologist 2007of <strong>the</strong> American Society of Andrology.References1.United Nations Department of Economic <strong>and</strong> Social Affairs, PopulationDivision. World Contraceptive Use 2005, 2005. Available at websitehttp://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/contraceptive2005/WCU2005.htm (accessed July 2007).2.Return of <strong>the</strong> Population Growth Fac<strong>to</strong>r – Its Impact Upon <strong>the</strong> MillenniumDevelopment Goals, 2007. Report of hearings by <strong>the</strong> All Party ParliamentaryGroup on Population, Development <strong>and</strong> Reproductive Health, House ofCommons, London.3.The World Bank. Population issues in <strong>the</strong> 21st century – <strong>the</strong> role of <strong>the</strong> WorldBank. Health, Nutrition <strong>and</strong> Population Discussion Paper, 2007.4.Heinemann K et al. Attitudes <strong>to</strong>ward male fertility control: results of amultinational survey on four continents. Human Reproduction, 2005,20(2):549-556.5.Martin CW et al. Potential impact of hormonal male contraception: crossculturalimplications for development of novel preparations. HumanReproduction, 2000, 15(3):637-645.6.ICPD Programme of Action, paragraph 12.14. Available at websitehttp://www.unfpa.org/icpd/icpd_poa.htm#ch12b (accessed July 2007).7.Gardner R, Blackburn RD, Upadhay UD. Closing <strong>the</strong> condom gap. PopulationReports, April 1999, Series H, No 9. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins UniversitySchool of Public Health, Population Information Program.8.Upadhay UD. New contraceptive choices. Population Reports, April 2005,Series M, No. 19. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of PublicHealth, The INFO project. Available at websitehttp://www.populationreports.org/m19/9.Lohiya NK et al. Vas deferens, a site of male contraception: an overview.Asian Journal of Andrology, 2001, 3:87-95.10.Sokal DC. Recent research on vasec<strong>to</strong>my techniques. Asian Journal ofAndrology, 2003, 5:227-230.11.World Health Organization Task Force on Methods for <strong>the</strong> Regulation of MaleFertility. Contraceptive efficacy of tes<strong>to</strong>sterone-induced azoospermia in normalmen. The Lancet, 1990, 336:955-959.12.World Health Organization Task Force on Methods for <strong>the</strong> Regulation of MaleFertility. Contraceptive efficacy of tes<strong>to</strong>sterone-induced azoospermia <strong>and</strong>oligozoospermia in normal men. Fertility <strong>and</strong> Sterility, 1996, 65:821-829.13.Gu Y-Q et al. A multicenter contraceptive efficacy study of injectabletes<strong>to</strong>sterone undecanoate in <strong>health</strong>y Chinese men. Journal of ClinicalEndocrinology & Metabolism, 2003, 88:562-568.14.Meriggiola MC, Farley TM, Mbizvo MT. A review of <strong>and</strong>rogen-progestinregimens for male contraception. Journal of Andrology, 2003,24(4):466-483.15.Wenk M, Nieschlag E. Male contraception: a realistic option? EuropeanJournal of Contraception <strong>and</strong> Reproductive Health Care, 2006,11:69-80.16.Kamischke A et al. Intramuscular tes<strong>to</strong>sterone undecanoate <strong>and</strong>norethisterone enanthate in a clinical trial for male contraception. Journal ofClinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 2001, 86:303-309.17.Kamischke A et al. An effective hormonal male contraceptive usingtes<strong>to</strong>sterone undecanoate with oral or injectable norethisterone preparations.Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 2002, 87:530-539.18.Meriggiola MC et al. Norethisterone enanthate plus tes<strong>to</strong>sterone undecanoatefor male contraception: effects of varions injection intervals onsperma<strong>to</strong>genesis, reproductive hormones, testis <strong>and</strong> prostate. Journal ofClinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 2005, 90:2005-2014.19.Nieschlag E, Behre HM. Tes<strong>to</strong>sterone in male contraception. In: Nieschlag <strong>and</strong>Behre (eds), Tes<strong>to</strong>sterone: Action, Deficiency, Substitution, 2nd edition,1998, Springer Heidelberg, pp.513-528.20.10th Summit Meeting Consensus: Recommendations for regula<strong>to</strong>ry approvalfor hormonal male contraception. International Journal of Andrology, 2007,30:63-64.130 ✜ Global Forum Update on Research for Health Volume 4
Research resourcesA new l<strong>and</strong>scapeof partnershipsArticle by Stefanie Meredith (pictured) <strong>and</strong> Elizabeth ZiembaOver <strong>the</strong> last few years, partnerships between public<strong>and</strong> private sec<strong>to</strong>r organizations have become agrowing phenomenon. These partnerships grew out ofa need <strong>to</strong> fill gaps in <strong>the</strong> <strong>health</strong> systems of developingcountries <strong>and</strong> have become an increasingly commonmechanism <strong>to</strong> address some of <strong>the</strong> diseases of <strong>the</strong> poor indeveloping countries.The ultimate goal of most of <strong>the</strong>se partnerships is <strong>to</strong>improve <strong>and</strong> increase access <strong>to</strong> treatment, particularly for <strong>the</strong>“neglected diseases”, <strong>and</strong> many also express <strong>the</strong> goal ofcontributing <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> alleviation of poverty.The need for such partnerships is explained by a failure of<strong>the</strong> public <strong>health</strong> system – <strong>the</strong> inability of <strong>the</strong> public sec<strong>to</strong>r <strong>to</strong>provide <strong>the</strong> public goods entirely on its own due <strong>to</strong> lack ofresources; competing priorities for <strong>the</strong> limited resourcesavailable; management issues; conflict <strong>and</strong> post-conflictsituations, etc. There is also a failure on <strong>the</strong> part of <strong>the</strong> privatesec<strong>to</strong>r when <strong>the</strong>re is little or no commercial incentive for <strong>the</strong>development of diagnostics <strong>and</strong> medicines for most of <strong>the</strong>diseases endemic in developing countries <strong>and</strong> affectingmainly <strong>the</strong> very poor.IntroductionEvery year, approximately US$ 70 billion is spent in <strong>health</strong>research but only about 10% of funding is targeted <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>diseases that account for 90% of <strong>the</strong> global disease burden.The unavailability of medicines <strong>to</strong> people in developingcountries results in enormous human <strong>and</strong> economic costs 1 .During <strong>the</strong> past ten years, <strong>the</strong> global <strong>health</strong> community hasidentified gaps in research <strong>and</strong> development of medicines <strong>to</strong>prevent or cure diseases that are primarily associated wi<strong>the</strong>xtreme poverty <strong>and</strong> its attendant lack of access <strong>to</strong> cleanwater, adequate nutrition, <strong>and</strong> basic sanitation 2 . Whilediseases such as malaria, tuberculosis <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs that areeven less well known are rampant in developing countries;<strong>the</strong>y are of lesser or no consequence in developedcountries 3,4,5,6 .There is little or no economic incentive <strong>to</strong> developpharmaceutical products 7,8 for <strong>the</strong>se diseases as well as o<strong>the</strong>rissues including: “distribution challenges in countries withpoor infrastructures <strong>and</strong> lack of awareness about <strong>the</strong>sediseases in more developed countries” 3 , “liabilityconsiderations, inadequate science base, <strong>and</strong>underestimation of <strong>the</strong> disease burden” 9 . As a consequence,compared with o<strong>the</strong>r diseases, minimal research on diseasesaffecting <strong>the</strong> poor has been conducted. To address thisenormous <strong>and</strong> widening gap in availability of medicines, <strong>the</strong>innovative approach <strong>to</strong> address this problem has been <strong>the</strong>formation of Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) 10 .The PPPs bring <strong>to</strong>ge<strong>the</strong>r skills, knowledge, <strong>and</strong> resourcesfrom a variety of sec<strong>to</strong>rs including academia, nongovernmentalorganizations, philanthropists, not-for-profi<strong>to</strong>rganizations, government <strong>and</strong> intergovernmental agencies,as well as members of <strong>the</strong> for-profit private sec<strong>to</strong>r such aspharmaceutical <strong>and</strong> biotech companies <strong>to</strong> create a uniqueapproach <strong>to</strong> solving a global <strong>health</strong> issue. From 1986 when<strong>the</strong> first such PPP for <strong>health</strong> was created until <strong>the</strong> end of2003, 91 such partnerships have been instituted, 78 ofwhich are still in existence 11 . Each partnership has its ownseparate legal status, broad range of goals, combinations ofpartners from <strong>the</strong> public <strong>and</strong> private sec<strong>to</strong>rs, managementstructures, <strong>and</strong> strategies 11 .Many partnerships reflect a mix of representatives from <strong>the</strong>public <strong>and</strong> private sec<strong>to</strong>rs on <strong>the</strong>ir boards of direc<strong>to</strong>rs, someof whom represent a particular institution while o<strong>the</strong>rs sit inan individual capacity; however, it remains unclear whichmodel is optimum for ensuring success.The nature, variety, <strong>and</strong> individuality of public-privatepartnerships make definition difficult 12,13,14 . For a workingdefinition, Public-Private Partnerships for <strong>health</strong> can bedefined as “arrangements that innovatively combine differentskills <strong>and</strong> resources from institutions in <strong>the</strong> public <strong>and</strong> privatesec<strong>to</strong>rs <strong>to</strong> address persistent global <strong>health</strong> problems” 15 .Although <strong>the</strong> philosophy behind PPPs includes shared risk,using complimentary skills <strong>and</strong> expertise from each partnerorganization <strong>and</strong> equal input from public <strong>and</strong> privateorganizations, <strong>the</strong> reality is that many of <strong>the</strong>se so-called PPPswould be better described more classically as partnerships oreven collaborations due <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> traditional division of financial<strong>and</strong> technical roles of <strong>the</strong> organizations.Global <strong>health</strong> partnerships frequently use <strong>the</strong> term“neglected diseases” when referring <strong>to</strong> a group of diseasesaffecting developing countries. According <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> Drugs forNeglected Diseases Initiative (DNDi) 16 , “neglected diseases”can be characterized as diseases that:✜ kill millions each year, primarily in <strong>the</strong> poorest areas of132 ✜ Global Forum Update on Research for Health Volume 4