Access <strong>to</strong> <strong>health</strong>Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) 38concludes that climate change can result in significantecosystem disruptions <strong>and</strong> threatens substantial damage <strong>to</strong><strong>the</strong> earth’s natural systems. In addition, several authors haveargued that maintaining a certain level of biodiversity isnecessary for <strong>the</strong> proper provision of ecosystem goods <strong>and</strong>services 39-42 . The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment warnsthat <strong>the</strong> ongoing degradation of ecosystem functions poses agrowing <strong>health</strong> risk 43 . Several ecosystem functions areimportant <strong>to</strong> sustain our physical <strong>health</strong>. First, ecosystemsprovide us with basic human needs like food, clean air, <strong>and</strong>clean water. Second, <strong>the</strong>y prevent <strong>the</strong> spread of diseasesthrough biological control. Finally, ecosystems provide us withmedical <strong>and</strong> genetic resources, which are necessary <strong>to</strong>prevent or cure diseases 44 .Globalization <strong>and</strong> proximal <strong>health</strong>determinantsFigure 2 shows that <strong>the</strong> impact of globalization on eachproximal <strong>health</strong> determinant is mediated by <strong>the</strong> abovediscussedchanges in distal fac<strong>to</strong>rs. The most importantrelationships will be discussed in more detail below.Health servicesHealth services are increasingly influenced by globalizationinducedchanges in <strong>health</strong> care policy, economicdevelopment <strong>and</strong> trade, <strong>and</strong> knowledge, but also bymigration. Although WHO aims <strong>to</strong> assist governments <strong>to</strong>streng<strong>the</strong>n <strong>health</strong> services, government involvement in <strong>health</strong>care policies has been decreasing <strong>and</strong>, subsequently, medicalinstitutions are more <strong>and</strong> more confronted with <strong>the</strong> neo-liberaleconomic model. According <strong>to</strong> Collins 45 , populations oftransitional economies are no longer protected by acentralized <strong>health</strong> sec<strong>to</strong>r that provides universal access <strong>to</strong>everyone <strong>and</strong> some groups are even denied <strong>the</strong> most basicmedical services.The increasing trade in <strong>health</strong> services also has someprofound implications. Although it is perceived as improving<strong>the</strong> consumer’s choice, some developments are believed <strong>to</strong>have long-term dangers, such as establishing a two-tier<strong>health</strong> system, movement of <strong>health</strong> professionals from <strong>the</strong>public sec<strong>to</strong>r <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> private sec<strong>to</strong>r, inequitable access <strong>to</strong><strong>health</strong> care <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> undermining of national <strong>health</strong>systems 9,11 . The illegal trading of drugs <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> provision ofaccess <strong>to</strong> controlled drugs via <strong>the</strong> Internet are potential<strong>health</strong> risks 46 . In addition, <strong>the</strong> globalization process can alsoresult in a “brain-drain” in <strong>the</strong> <strong>health</strong> sec<strong>to</strong>r as a result oflabour migration from developing <strong>to</strong> developed regions 47 .However, increased economic growth is generally believed <strong>to</strong>enhance improvements in <strong>health</strong> care. Increased(technological) knowledge resulting from <strong>the</strong> diffusion ofinformation can fur<strong>the</strong>r improve <strong>the</strong> treatment <strong>and</strong>prevention of diseases.Social environmentOne central mechanism that links <strong>the</strong> <strong>social</strong> environment <strong>to</strong><strong>health</strong> is “<strong>social</strong> support”, <strong>the</strong> transfer from one person <strong>to</strong>ano<strong>the</strong>r of instrumental, emotional <strong>and</strong> informationalassistance 48 . Social networks <strong>and</strong> <strong>social</strong> integration areclosely related <strong>to</strong> <strong>social</strong> support 49 <strong>and</strong>, as a result,globalization-induced changes in <strong>social</strong> cohesion, integration<strong>and</strong> interaction can influence <strong>the</strong> degree of <strong>social</strong> support ina population.Ano<strong>the</strong>r important fac<strong>to</strong>r in <strong>the</strong> <strong>social</strong> environment isviolence, which often is <strong>the</strong> result of <strong>the</strong> complex interplay ofmany fac<strong>to</strong>rs. WHO 50 argues that globalization gives rise <strong>to</strong>obstacles as well as benefits for violence prevention. Itinduces changes in protective fac<strong>to</strong>rs like <strong>social</strong> cohesion,EconomicsGlobal marketsGlobalizationprocessSocio-culturalGlobal communication &diffusion of informationglobal mobilitycross-cultural interactionInstitutionalstructuresGlobal governanceHealth policy<strong>health</strong>-relatedpolicyEconomicdevelopmenttradeHealthservices–SocioenvironmentallifestylePopulation<strong>health</strong>Knowledge<strong>social</strong>interactionsPhysical livingenvironmentfood & waterEcosystemgoods <strong>and</strong> servicesGlobalenvironmentalchangeEnvironmentalContextualdeterminantsDistaldeterminantsProximaldeterminantsFigure 2: Conceptual framework for globalization <strong>and</strong> population <strong>health</strong> 2070 ✜ Global Forum Update on Research for Health Volume 4
Access <strong>to</strong> <strong>health</strong>knowledge <strong>and</strong> education levels, <strong>and</strong> global preventionactivities. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r h<strong>and</strong>, it also influences importantrisk fac<strong>to</strong>rs associated with violence such as incomeinequality, collective conflict, <strong>and</strong> trade in alcohol, drugsor firearms.LifestyleDue <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> widespread flow of people, information <strong>and</strong> ideas,lifestyles also spread throughout <strong>the</strong> world. It is alreadywidely acknowledged that several modern behavioural fac<strong>to</strong>rssuch as an un<strong>health</strong>y diet, physical inactivity, smoking,alcohol misuse <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> use of illicit drugs are having aprofound impact on human <strong>health</strong> 51-54 . Individuals respond <strong>to</strong><strong>the</strong> range of <strong>health</strong>y as well as un<strong>health</strong>y lifestyle options <strong>and</strong>choices available in a community 55 , which are in turndetermined by global trade, economic development <strong>and</strong><strong>social</strong> interactions. Although <strong>the</strong> major chronic diseases arenot transmittable via an infectious agent, <strong>the</strong> behaviours thatpredispose <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>se diseases can be communicated byadvertising, product marketing <strong>and</strong> <strong>social</strong> interactions 56 .Global trade <strong>and</strong> marketing developments drive, for example,un<strong>health</strong>y developments in diet 53,55 , <strong>to</strong>bacco use 53,57 , <strong>and</strong>alcohol consumption 58 .However, <strong>health</strong> education can play a role in promoting<strong>health</strong>y lifestyles by improving an individual’s knowledgeabout <strong>the</strong> <strong>health</strong> effects of different lifestyle options. Besides<strong>health</strong> education, (global) policies can also directlydiscourage un<strong>health</strong>y behaviour by means of economicincentives (e.g. charging excise on <strong>to</strong>bacco) or o<strong>the</strong>rlegislation. An effective implementation of WHO FrameworkConvention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) 59 is expected <strong>to</strong> haveprofound implications on <strong>to</strong>bacco related-policies <strong>and</strong>,hopefully, <strong>to</strong>bacco use.Physical living environment: infectious disease pathogensThe spread of infectious diseases is probably one of <strong>the</strong> mostmentioned <strong>health</strong> effects of globalization <strong>and</strong> past diseaseoutbreaks have been linked <strong>to</strong> fac<strong>to</strong>rs that are related <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>globalization process (e.g. Newcomb 60 ). The SARS outbreakdemonstrated <strong>the</strong> potential of new infectious diseases <strong>to</strong>spread rapidly in <strong>to</strong>day’s world. The combination ofmovement of goods <strong>and</strong> people, <strong>and</strong> profound changesaffecting ecosystem goods <strong>and</strong> services all contribute <strong>to</strong>increased risk of disease spread. For example, <strong>the</strong>globalization of food production, trade <strong>and</strong> consumption hasbeen associated with <strong>the</strong> increased spread <strong>and</strong> transmissionof food born diseases 61 .The global spread of knowledge <strong>and</strong> technologies,however, can improve <strong>the</strong> outbreak surveillance <strong>and</strong>moni<strong>to</strong>ring of antibiotic resistance 21 , increasing <strong>the</strong> speedof responses in some cases. Wilson 28 states thatresponding <strong>to</strong> disease emergence requires a globalperspective. Hence, <strong>the</strong> policies <strong>and</strong> actions undertakenby WHO are becoming increasingly important incontrolling infectious diseases at a global level. Forinstance, WHO played a critical role in controlling SARSby means of global alerts, geographically specific traveladvisories <strong>and</strong> moni<strong>to</strong>ring 62 .FoodFood trade has become an increasingly important fac<strong>to</strong>r withregard <strong>to</strong> food security worldwide. At present, however, <strong>the</strong>developed countries still subsidize <strong>the</strong>ir agricultural sec<strong>to</strong>rs,<strong>and</strong> tariffs for agricultural products remain relatively high.Economic liberalization policies are expected <strong>to</strong> haveprofound implications on food trade <strong>and</strong>, subsequently foodsecurity 63 . Some argue that free trade will create access <strong>to</strong>better <strong>and</strong> cheaper food supplies via food imports <strong>and</strong> canstimulate more efficient use of <strong>the</strong> world’s resources, as wellas <strong>the</strong> production of food in regions that are more suitable <strong>to</strong>do so. Accelerated economic growth can also contribute <strong>to</strong>food security 63, 64 . According <strong>to</strong> The State Of Food Insecurity in<strong>the</strong> World 2005 65 , accelerating <strong>the</strong> progress <strong>to</strong>wards an open<strong>and</strong> more equitable trading system is one of <strong>the</strong> key elementsin <strong>the</strong> worldwide reduction in hunger.On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r h<strong>and</strong>, trade could also endanger food security(e.g. Lang 66 ). For many countries <strong>the</strong> increasing dependenceincreases <strong>the</strong>ir vulnerability <strong>to</strong> shocks arising in globalmarkets, which can affect import capacity <strong>and</strong> access <strong>to</strong> foodimports 63 . Many food insecure countries are not able <strong>to</strong> earnenough with exporting goods in order <strong>to</strong> pay for <strong>the</strong> neededfood imports 67 .At <strong>the</strong> global level, <strong>the</strong>re are increasing international efforts<strong>to</strong> achieve widespread food security. In 1996, <strong>the</strong> World FoodSummit, for example, stressed <strong>the</strong> right of everyone <strong>to</strong> haveaccess <strong>to</strong> safe <strong>and</strong> nutritious food. Globalization can alsoenhance <strong>the</strong> knowledge of foreign nations about <strong>the</strong>usefulness of food aid. Additionally, <strong>the</strong> globalization processcan facilitate <strong>the</strong> worldwide implementation of bettertechnologies <strong>and</strong> improved knowledge. At <strong>the</strong> same time,however, <strong>the</strong> natural resource base for food production isincreasingly threatened by compromised ecosystemfunctioning due <strong>to</strong> global environmental change.WaterGlobalization also raises concerns over water security. Theglobalization process is accompanied by privatization policiesaffecting <strong>the</strong> provision of water. Governments <strong>and</strong>international financial institutions promote privatization, as<strong>the</strong>y believe it will promote market competition <strong>and</strong> efficiency.O<strong>the</strong>rs are less optimistic about <strong>the</strong> effects of privatization. Infact, some cases show that prices <strong>and</strong> inequalities in accesseven rise 68 . The virtual trade of water is also believed <strong>to</strong> be ofincreasing importance, The water that is used in <strong>the</strong>production process of a commodity is called <strong>the</strong> “virtualwater” contained in that commodity. Therefore, <strong>the</strong> increasingglobal trade of commodities is accompanied by an increasingtrade in virtual water 69 .In addition, <strong>the</strong> globalization process can increase watersecurity by facilitating <strong>the</strong> worldwide implementation of bettertechnologies <strong>and</strong> improved knowledge. At <strong>the</strong> same time, <strong>the</strong>natural resource base is increasingly threatened as, forexample, global climate change <strong>and</strong> deforestation profoundlyaffect our ecosystems’ ability <strong>to</strong> provide us with sufficient <strong>and</strong>adequate fresh water. On a global scale, <strong>the</strong>re are increasingefforts <strong>to</strong> set up global guidelines or policies with regard <strong>to</strong>fresh water, however, none of <strong>the</strong> international declarationsGlobal Forum Update on Research for Health Volume 4 ✜ 071