Combining health and social protection measures to reach the ultra ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Access to healthItemDefinition/Explanation1 Primary Register and trial ID # Name of Primary Register, and the unique ID number assigned by the Primary Register to this trial.2 Date of registration inPrimary RegisterDate when trial was officially registered in the Primary Register.3 Secondary ID#s Other identifying numbers and issuing authorities besides the Primary Register, if any. Include the sponsorname and sponsor-issued trial number (e.g., protocol number) if available. Also include other trial registers that haveissued an ID number to this trial. There is no limit on the number of Secondary ID numbers that can be provided.4 Source(s) of monetary ormaterial supportMajor source(s) of monetary or material support for the trial (e.g., funding agency, foundation, company).5 Primary Sponsor The individual, organization, group or other legal entity which takes responsibility for initiating, managing and/orfinancing a study.The Primary Sponsor is responsible for ensuring that the trial is properly registered. The Primary Sponsor may or maynot be the main funder.6 Secondary Sponsor(s) Additional individuals, organizations, or other legal persons, if any, that have agreed with the Primary Sponsor to takeon responsibilities of sponsorship.A Secondary Sponsor may have agreed:• to take on all the responsibilities of sponsorship jointly with the Primary Sponsor; or• to form a group with the Primary Sponsor in which the responsibilities of sponsorship are allocated among themembers of the group; or to act as the sponsor’s legal representative in relation to some or all of the trial sites; or• to take responsibility for the accuracy of trial registration information submitted.7 Contact for public queries Email address, telephone number, or postal address of the contact who will respond to general queries, includinginformation about current recruitment status.8 Contact for scientific queries Email address, telephone number, or postal address, and affiliation of the person to contact for scientific queries aboutthe trial (e.g., principal investigator, medical director employed by the sponsor). For a multi-centre study, enter thecontact information for the lead Principal Investigator or overall scientific director.9 Public title Title intended for the lay public in easily understood language.10 Scientific title Scientific title of the study as it appears in the protocol submitted for funding and ethical review. Include trial acronymif available.11 Countries of recruitment The countries from which participants will be, are intended to be, or have been recruited.12 Health condition(s) Primary health condition(s) or problem(s) studied (e.g., depression, breast cancer, medication error). If the study isor problem(s) studiedconducted in healthy human volunteers belonging to the target population of the intervention (e.g., preventative orscreening interventions), enter the particular health condition(s) or problem(s) being prevented. If the study isconducted in healthy human volunteers not belonging to the target population (e.g., a preliminary safety study), anappropriate keyword will be defined for users to select.13 Intervention(s) Enter the specific name of the intervention(s) and the comparator/control(s) being studied. Use the International Non-Proprietary Name if possible (not brand/trade names). For an unregistered drug, the generic name, chemical name, orcompany serial number is acceptable. If the intervention consists of several separate treatments, list them all in one lineseparated by commas (e.g., “low-fat diet, exercise”).The control intervention(s) is/are the interventions against which the study intervention is evaluated (e.g., placebo, notreatment, active control). If an active control is used, be sure to enter in the name(s) of that intervention, or enter“placebo” or “no treatment” as applicable.For each intervention, describe other intervention details as applicable (dose, duration, mode of administration, etc.).14 Key inclusion and Inclusion and exclusion criteria for participant selection, including age and sex.exclusion criteria15 Study type A single arm study is one in which all participants are given the same intervention. Trials in which participants areassigned to receive one of two or more interventions are NOT single arm studies. Crossover trials are NOT single arm studies.A trial is “randomized” if participants are assigned to intervention groups using a method based on chance (e.g.,random number table, random computer-generated sequence, minimization, adaptive randomization).16 Date of first enrolment If the trial is being registered after recruitment of the first participant record actual date of Anticipated date ofenrolment of the first participant.17 Target sample size Number of participants that this trial plans to enrol.18 Recruitment status Recruitment status of this trial.• Pending: participants are not yet being recruited or enroled at any site .• Active: participants are currently being recruited and enrolled.• Temporary halt: there is a temporary halt in recruitment and enrollment.• Closed: participants are no longer being recruited or enroled.19 Primary outcome(s) Outcomes are events, variables, or experiences that are measured because it is believed that they may be influenced bythe intervention. The Primary Outcome should be the outcome used in sample size calculations, or the main outcome(s)used to determine the effects of the intervention(s).Enter the names of all primary outcomes in the trial as well as the pre-specified timepoint(s) of primary interest. Be asspecific as possible with the metric used (e.g., “% with Beck Depression Score > 10” rather than just “depression”).Examples: Outcome Name: all-cause mortality, Timepoints: 5 years; or Outcome Name: Mean Beck Depression Score,Timepoint: 18 weeks.20 Key secondary outcomes Secondary outcomes are events, variables, or experiences that are of secondary interest or that are measured attimepoints of secondary interest. A secondary outcome may involve the same event, variable, or experience as theprimary outcome, but measured at timepoints other than those of primary interest (e.g., Primary outcome: all-causemortality at 5 years; Secondary outcome: all-cause mortality at 1 year, 3 years), or may involve a different event,variable, or experience altogether (e.g., Primary outcome: all-cause mortality at 5 years; Secondary outcome:hospitalization rate at 5 years). Enter the name and timepoint(s) for all secondary outcomes of clinical and/or scientificimportance. Be as specific as possible with the metric used (e.g., “% with Beck Depression Score > 10” rather than just“depression”). Examples: Outcome Name: all-cause mortality, Timepoint: 6 months, 1 year; or Outcome Name: Meanglycosylated hemoglobin A1C, Timepoint: 4 and 8 weeks.Last update: July 2007. Available: http://www.who.int/ictrp/data_set/en/index.htmlAppendix A: WHO Minimum Data Set044 ✜ Global Forum Update on Research for Health Volume 4
Access to healthReferences1.World Health Organization (WHO). Ministerial Summit on HealthResearch, 2004. Online: http://www.who.int/rpc/summit/en/ (dateaccessed 21 July 2007).2.World Health Organization (WHO) (A). International Clinical Trials RegistryPlatform. Online: http://www.who.int/ictrp/about/en/ (date accessed July21 2007).3.Symes RJ. Publication bias: the case for an international registry of clinicaltrials. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1986, vol. 4, pp. 1529-1541.Dickersin K. Report from the panel on the case for registers of clinicaltrials at the eighth annual meeting of the society for clinical trials.Controlled Clinical Trials, 1988, vol. 9 pp. 76-81. Dickersin K & RennieD. Registering clinical trials. Journal of the American MedicalAssociation, 2003, vol. 290, no. 4, pp. 516-523.4.Rennie D. Trial registration: a great idea switches from ignored toirresistible. Journal of the American Medical Association, 2004, vol.292, pp. 1359-1362. Lemmens T. Leopards in the temple: restoringintegrity to the commercialized research scene. Journal of Law, Medicine& Ethics, 2005, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 641-657.5.Angell M. The truth about the drug companies: how they deceive us andwhat to do about it. Random House, New York, 2004. Dickersin K &Rennie D. Registering clinical trials. Journal of the American MedicalAssociation, 2003, vol. 290, no. 4, pp. 516-523. Kassirer J. On thetake: how medicine’s complicity with big business can endanger yourhealth. Oxford University Press, New York, 2004.6.Rennie D. Trial registration: a great idea switches from ignored toirresistible. Journal of the American Medical Association, 2004, vol.292, pp. 1359-1362.7.Office of the New York State Attorney General. Settlement sets newstandard for release of drug information: Glaxo to establish “clinical trialsregister” with information on all company drugs, 2004. Online:http://www.oag.state.ny.us/press/2004/aug/aug26a_04.html (dateaccessed 20 May 2007).8.Rennie D. Trial registration: a great idea switches from ignored toirresistible. Journal of the American Medical Association, 2004, vol.292, pp. 1359-1362.9.Krleza-Jeric K et al. Principles for international registration of protocolinformation and results from human trials of health related interventions:Ottawa Statement (part 1). British Medical Journal, 2005, vol. 330, pp.956-958.10.De Angelis CD et al. Clinical trial registration: a statement from theInternational Committee of Medical Journal Editors. New England Journalof Medicine, 2004, vol. 351, no.12, pp. 1250-1251.11.Laine C et al. Clinical trial registration: Looking back and moving ahead.New England Journal of Medicine, 2007, vol. 356, no. 26, pp. 2734-2733.12.Sim I et al. Clinical trial registration: transparency is the watchword. TheLancet, 2006, vol. 367, no.9523, pp. 1631-1633.13.International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers & Associates.International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP): IFPMA commentsto ICTRP consultation on delayed disclosure, 2006. Online:www.who.int/entity/ictrp/3005_IFPMA_25Jan06.pdf (date accessed 21July 2007). Krall R & Rockhold F. More on compulsory registration ofclinical trials: GSK has created useful register. British Medical Journal,2005, vol. 330, pp. 479–480. Krall RL & Rockhold F. Trial registration:Putting principles into practice, 2005b. Online:http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/eletters/330/7497/956#107176(accessed 21 July 2007).14.Krleza-Jeric K. Clinical trial registration: the differing views of industry,the WHO and the Ottawa Group. PLoS Medicine, 2005, vol. 2 no.11,pp. 1098-1097.15.De Angelis CD et al. Clinical trial registration: a statement from theInternational Committee of Medical Journal Editors. New England Journalof Medicine, 2004, vol. 351, no.12, pp. 1250-1251.16.Lemmens T. Leopards in the temple: restoring integrity to thecommercialized research scene. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics,2005, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 641-657. Bouchard RA. Balancing public andprivate interests in commercialization of publicly funded biomedicaltechnologies: Is there a role for compulsory government royalty fees?.Boston University Journal of Science and Technology Law, 2007, vol.13, no. 2. (forthcoming).17.Godlee F. Winning hearts and minds. British Medical Journal, 2005, vol.330, pp.1224. Burton B. Drug chiefs ponder how to improve industry’sreputation. British Medical Journal, 2005, vol. 330, pp. 122918.Kahn JP. Beyond disclosure: the necessity of trust in biomedical research.Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine, 2007, vol. 74(S2): S49-S50. IrwinRS. Clinical trial registration promotes patient protection and benefit,advances the trust of everyone, and is required. Chest, 2007, vol. 131,no. 3, pp. 639-641.19.Chalmers I. Underreporting research is scientific misconduct. Journal ofthe American Medical Association, 1990, vol. 263, no. 10, pp. 1405-1408. De Angelis CD et al. Clinical trial registration: a statement from theInternational Committee of Medical Journal Editors. New England Journalof Medicine, 2004, vol. 351, no.12, pp. 1250-1251.20.World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki, 1964 (last update2000). Online: http://www.wma.net/e/policy/b3.htm (date accessed 21July 2007).21.The Nuremburg Code. Trials of War Criminals before the NurembergMilitary Tribunals under Control Council Law, 1949, No. 10, Vol. 2, pp.181-182. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office. Onlinehttp://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/references/nurcode.htm (date accessed 21 July2007).22.Sim I et al. Clinical trial registration: transparency is the watchword. TheLancet, 2006, vol. 367, no.9523, pp. 1631-1633.23.De Angelis CD et al. Is this trial fully registered? A statement from theInternational Committee of Medical Journal Editors. New England Journalof Medicine, 2005, vol. 352, no.23, pp. 2436-2438.24.Tonks A. Registering clinical trials. British Medical Journal, 1999, vol.319, no. 7224, pp. 1565-1568.25.Chalmers TC. Randomize the first patient! New England Journal ofMedicine, 1977, vol. 296, pp. 107. Dickersin K & Rennie D. Registeringclinical trials. Journal of the American Medical Association, 2003, vol.290, no. 4, pp. 516-523.26.Tonks A. Registering clinical trials. British Medical Journal, 1999, vol.319, no. 7224, pp. 1565-1568.27.Krleza-Jeric K. Clinical trial registration: the differing views of industry,the WHO and the Ottawa Group. PLoS Medicine, 2005, vol. 2 no.11,pp. 1098-1097.28.Tonks A. Registering clinical trials. British Medical Journal, 1999, vol.319, no. 7224, pp. 1565-1568.29.Dickersin K & Rennie D. Registering clinical trials. Journal of theAmerican Medical Association, 2003, vol. 290, no. 4, pp. 516-523. SimI et al. Clinical trial registration: transparency is the watchword. TheLancet, 2006, vol. 367, no.9523, pp. 1631-1633. Irwin RS. Clinicaltrial registration promotes patient protection and benefit, advances thetrust of everyone, and is required. Chest, 2007, vol. 131, no. 3, pp.639-641. Chan A-W et al. Empirical evidence for selective reporting ofoutcomes in randomized clinical trials. Comparison of protocols topublished articles. Journal of the American Medical Association, 2005,vol. 291, no. 20, pp. 2457-2465.30.Dickersin K & Rennie D. Registering clinical trials. Journal of theAmerican Medical Association, 2003, vol. 290, no. 4, pp. 516-523.31.Sim I et al. Clinical trial registration: transparency is the watchword. TheLancet, 2006, vol. 367, no.9523, pp. 1631-1633. Krleza-Jeric K.Clinical trial registration: the differing views of industry, the WHO and theOttawa Group. PLoS Medicine, 2005, vol. 2 no.11, pp. 1098-1097.32.Tonks A. Registering clinical trials. British Medical Journal, 1999, vol.319, no. 7224, pp. 1565-1568.33.Tonks A. Registering clinical trials. British Medical Journal, 1999, vol.319, no. 7224, pp. 1565-1568.34.Tonks A. Registering clinical trials. British Medical Journal, 1999, vol.319, no. 7224, pp. 1565-1568.35.Sim I et al. Clinical trial registration: transparency is the watchword. TheGlobal Forum Update on Research for Health Volume 4 ✜ 045
Page 3 and 4: Editorial Advisory Board:Luis Gabri
Page 5 and 6: Contents096 Child immunization: acc
Page 7 and 8: IntroductionResearch contributions
Page 9 and 10: IntroductionType IType IIType IIIPr
Page 11 and 12: Introductionmaking), takes account
Page 13: Access to healthStrengthening healt
Page 16 and 17: Access to healthTraining more healt
Page 18 and 19: Access to healthimperative for acti
Page 20 and 21: Access to healthReferences1.Further
Page 22 and 23: Access to healthDeterminantsAvailab
Page 24 and 25: Access to healthThe authors are inv
Page 26 and 27: Access to healthCombining health an
Page 28 and 29: Access to health100%Availability of
Page 30 and 31: Access to healthhypothesis that an
Page 32 and 33: Access to healthMandatory clinical
Page 34 and 35: Access to healthWhile there are som
Page 38 and 39: Access to healthReferences continue
Page 40 and 41: Access to healthintegrating individ
Page 42 and 43: Access to healthA social determinan
Page 44 and 45: Access to healthemployment conditio
Page 46 and 47: Access to healthMaking human rights
Page 48 and 49: Access to healthResources outsideth
Page 50 and 51: Access to healthReferences1.McCoy D
Page 52 and 53: Access to healthand financial burde
Page 54 and 55: Access to healthDiscrimination as a
Page 56 and 57: Access to health“Two months ago I
Page 60 and 61: Access to healthsocio-cultural and
Page 62 and 63: Access to healthIntergovernmental P
Page 64 and 65: Access to healthand conference stat
Page 68 and 69: InnovationTowards the development o
Page 70 and 71: InnovationMajor classificationMajor
Page 72 and 73: Innovation60% of enterprises5040302
Page 74 and 75: InnovationUsing the power ofintelle
Page 76 and 77: Innovationbe adapted - and harnesse
Page 78 and 79: InnovationFinancing of vaccine R&D-
Page 80 and 81: InnovationFinancing Ultimate Interm
Page 82 and 83: Innovationsome of this risk might b
Page 84 and 85: InnovationChild immunization:accele
Page 86 and 87:
Innovationare revealing previously
Page 88 and 89:
InnovationDeveloping countries % De
Page 90 and 91:
Innovationcapacities. It is indeed
Page 92 and 93:
InnovationSome plausible causes of
Page 94 and 95:
Innovationwhere he was a programme
Page 96 and 97:
Research resourcesResearch impact o
Page 98 and 99:
Research resourcesBiotechnologists6
Page 100 and 101:
Research resources1,61001,41,219080
Page 102 and 103:
Research resourcesReferences1.The R
Page 104 and 105:
Research resources✜ A group of nu
Page 106 and 107:
Research resourcesReferences1.Inter
Page 108 and 109:
Research resourcesThe threat of pan
Page 110 and 111:
Research resourcesChanging environm
Page 112 and 113:
Research resourcesPartnerships offe
Page 114 and 115:
Research resourcesWe encourage othe
Page 116 and 117:
Research resources181614No. of PPPs
Page 118 and 119:
Research resources12010080604020Pro
Page 120 and 121:
Research resourcesCapacity strength
Page 122 and 123:
Research resourcestreatment is prov
Page 124 and 125:
Research resourcesSmall scale busin
Page 126 and 127:
Research resourcesthis process in a
Page 128 and 129:
Research resourcesways. For instanc
Page 130 and 131:
Decision-making148 Delivering evide
Page 132:
Decision-makingChallenges in employ
Page 136 and 137:
Decision-makingUsing evidence forpo
Page 138 and 139:
Decision-makingdesire to publish. T
Page 140 and 141:
Decision-makingsystems development.
Page 142 and 143:
Decision-makingTowards evidence-inf
Page 144 and 145:
Decision-making✜ develop a critic
Page 146 and 147:
Decision-makingwas prior to 2001, a
Page 148 and 149:
Decision-makingGlobal and regional
Page 150 and 151:
Decision-makingHigh-incomeChildrenE
Page 152 and 153:
Decision-makingLow- and middle-inco
Page 154 and 155:
Decision-makingLow- and middle-inco
Page 156 and 157:
Decision-makingthan a quarter of th
Page 158 and 159:
Decision-makingThe potentials of in
Page 160 and 161:
Decision-makingGenerally, any resea
Page 162 and 163:
Decision-makingReferences1.Hawes H.
show all

Combining health and social protection measures to reach the ultra ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?