12.07.2015 Views

Defining CCS Ready: An Approach to An International Definition

Defining CCS Ready: An Approach to An International Definition

Defining CCS Ready: An Approach to An International Definition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Appendix B: Technology Design Options for a Capture <strong>Ready</strong> PlantExhibit B-10: Capture <strong>Ready</strong> and Post <strong>CCS</strong> Retrofit Capital Cost Comparisonfor IGCC Reference Plant and Selexol OptionCapital Cost w/ CR costs Capital Cost w/ <strong>CCS</strong> retrofitCapture <strong>Ready</strong> Option $000 $/kW $000 $/kWReference Plant 1,080 1,733 1,318 2,635Capture <strong>Ready</strong> Option 1 1,147 1,840 1,271 2,453B.3.4 Potential for New TechnologiesThere are a large number of potential improvements for the pre-combustion capturesystems. Research in the field of pre-combustion capture is focused on both improving theIGCC process itself as well as improving CO 2 separation technologies. IGCC technology isstill in the development phase, with little commercial operation experience. Therefore, thereis a significant potential for major performance improvements and capital cost reductions.NETL 147 mentions a number of improvements <strong>to</strong> the IGCC process, as shown in Exhibit B-11. As both gasification and power island technologies are fairly mature, most efforts arefocused on the development of integration components such as air separation, syngascleanup, and advanced turbines for hydrogen-rich gas. Fac<strong>to</strong>rs driving gasifier developmentscenter on increasing availability and reliability and reducing the investment cost.Exhibit B-11: Areas of Potential Technology Improvement and Their ImpactsTechnologySyngas cleanupAir Separation through IonTransport Mechanism andadvanced syngas turbineAir Separation through IonTransport Mechanism andadvanced syngas turbine (II)Major TechnologyImpactWarm gas clean upeliminates cold gas cleanup thermal penalties andreduces capital costEliminates ASU thermalpenalty and auxiliary loadand reduces capital costsCombination of increasedpower output andefficient, cheaper ASUEfficiencyImpact(% point increase)TPC Impact($/kW reduction)TPC Impact(% reduction)2 319 17.6%0 118 6.5%2.1 89 4.9%Advanced syngas turbine Increases power output 0.9 73 4.0%Dry coal feed pumpAdvanced IGCC TechnologyTotal ImpactIncreases cold gasefficiency1 19 1.1%5.9 618 34%Source: U.S. Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Labora<strong>to</strong>ry (U.S. DOE-NETL). (2008c).The base cost is $1800/kW over which reductions are computed. Note: efficiency impacts are HHV-based.147 U.S. Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Labora<strong>to</strong>ry (U.S. DOE-NETL). (2008c). Current and futureIGCC technologies (DOE/NETL Publication no. 2008/1337).23 February 2010 94

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!