12.07.2015 Views

Defining CCS Ready: An Approach to An International Definition

Defining CCS Ready: An Approach to An International Definition

Defining CCS Ready: An Approach to An International Definition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 1: Introduction1. IntroductionThe <strong>International</strong> Energy Agency (IEA) projects that the world’s primary energyconsumption will increase by 40% above 2007 levels by the year 2030, driven primarily byincreased demand for electricity. 1 Globally, coal fuels the generation of 42% of electricity<strong>to</strong>day, and is expected <strong>to</strong> remain a significant source for power generation in the future. 1Other fossil fuels, such as oil and natural gas, are also widely used in the power andindustrial sec<strong>to</strong>rs and their demand is expected <strong>to</strong> rise as well in the future. 1Counterbalanced against this rising demand for fossil fuel energy is a growing internationalrecognition of climate change and an increasing aspiration <strong>to</strong> control greenhouse gas (GHG)emissions. The burning of fossil fuels accounts for nearly 57% of global greenhouse gasemissions. 2 Governments may impose GHG emissions limits on power plants and otherlarge emitters <strong>to</strong> control emissions.While improvements in energy efficiency and greater use of renewable energy will help <strong>to</strong>reduce the carbon intensity of energy consumption, the IEA projects a high demand for thetechnology <strong>to</strong> geologically s<strong>to</strong>re carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emissions that may be captured fromfossil-fuel based plants. CO 2 capture, transport, and s<strong>to</strong>rage (<strong>CCS</strong>) technology allows forglobal CO 2 emissions <strong>to</strong> be reduced even as consumption of fossil fuels increases.IEA’s Energy Technology Perspectives 2008 states that the application of <strong>CCS</strong> in powergeneration and industry is “the most important single new technology for CO 2 savings.” TheIEA defines <strong>CCS</strong> as a process whereby CO 2 is captured from gases produced by fossil fuelcombustion, compressed, transported and injected in<strong>to</strong> deep geologic formations for permanents<strong>to</strong>rage. 3 The IEA estimates that <strong>CCS</strong> used in the power and industrial sec<strong>to</strong>rs will accountfor 19% of <strong>to</strong>tal CO 2 savings needed <strong>to</strong> achieve a 50% reduction in emissions by 2050. 4Need for <strong>CCS</strong> <strong>Ready</strong> PlantsAlthough <strong>CCS</strong> will likely be a key component of a future portfolio of technologies in majorenergy-consuming nations, <strong>CCS</strong> has not yet been widely deployed on a commercial scale.The technology is currently not fully mature, as there are still technical, economic,regula<strong>to</strong>ry, and policy barriers <strong>to</strong> its deployment. Governments and industry have beenworking <strong>to</strong>gether and have invested heavily <strong>to</strong> resolve these barriers.While these barriers are gradually being reduced, new fossil-fuel based power plants andother industrial facilities continue <strong>to</strong> be designed and built worldwide. In a carbonconstrainedfuture, unless these new plants are designed with eventual <strong>CCS</strong> in mind, theymay incur a high cost of retrofitting <strong>to</strong> <strong>CCS</strong> or may have <strong>to</strong> shut down before their usefuleconomic life. The absence of <strong>CCS</strong> <strong>Ready</strong> plants could result in a carbon “lock-in,” asituation in which plants continue <strong>to</strong> emit large amounts of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) ifmitigation through <strong>CCS</strong> is technically and economically infeasible due <strong>to</strong> equipment and site1 <strong>International</strong> Energy Agency (IEA). (2009b). World Energy Outlook 2009.2 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2007). Climate change 2007: Synthesis report. Contribution ofWorking Groups I, 11, and III <strong>to</strong> the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.3 <strong>International</strong> Energy Agency (IEA). (2010). Carbon dioxide (CO2) capture and s<strong>to</strong>rage (<strong>CCS</strong>).4 Based on the BLUE Map scenario presented in <strong>International</strong> Energy Agency (IEA). (2008). Energy technology perspectives2008: Scenarios and strategies <strong>to</strong> 2050. Paris, France: Author.23 February 2010 7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!