Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
120<br />
below, but (to again take things out of sequence), we did share some intimate thoughts<br />
outside of the blog before my mom returned.<br />
So this blog entry is very much dictated but not read. I listened carefully to what he said,<br />
and this is my best shot at conveying it.<br />
He told me that he was very depressed last night, feeling that there wasn't hope for him.<br />
But today he has a ray of hope. He said his brain function "is not that great right now", but<br />
he is more optimistic based on the fact that we don't yet know if the chemo worked, and it<br />
may well have worked. He then laid out two scenarios:<br />
The optimistic scenario: The chemo worked. In a few days he finds out that it worked and<br />
the stent comes out, he goes home, he has a chance to beat this thing.<br />
The pessimistic scenario: The chemo didn't work. In a few days he finds out that it did not<br />
work and there is not much hope.<br />
He says that everything is based on whether the chemo worked. I then asked him<br />
whether there was a third scenario, a middle ground where the chemo didn't work, but he<br />
feels better for a time. He doesn't get more chemo, but <strong>with</strong> pain management he is able<br />
to go home and enjoy some quality time before he passes away. He agreed that the<br />
middle ground scenario was possible and agreed that I should add it to his blog entry.<br />
As for his current status, his blood pressure is still relatively low (88/50 earlier, but when I<br />
left it was around 80/50). I believe his ability to concentrate was cycling <strong>with</strong> drops in<br />
blood pressure, but that might just have been coincidental (he hasn't slept a reasonable<br />
amount in couple of days so there are plenty of reasons he might have trouble<br />
concentrating). They gave him IV steroids just before I left to try to raise his blood<br />
pressure. The risk is a secondary fungal infection, but they said that his blood pressure<br />
was just too low and they could control the risk <strong>with</strong> anti-fungals.<br />
They confirmed that he had sepsis. Blood drawn yesterday was cultured and showed<br />
gram positive cocci in clusters. They continue to give him antibiotics, although they're<br />
going to monitor his renal function since the antibiotics can create renal function issues.<br />
It turns out that the ICU has a rule that between 7:00 (am and pm) and 8:30 (am and pm,<br />
respectively), no visitors can be present. This is to allow the staff to brief each other more<br />
effectively during the shift change. We were sent home at 7:00 pm, and my dad indicated<br />
that we should come back in the morning. I asked the nurse to call me if he thought that<br />
my being there overnight would improve the treatment outlook, and he promised he<br />
would. He hasn't called yet, and assuming I don't get a call I'll return to the hospital after<br />
the morning shift change.<br />
<strong>My</strong> dad remains cognitively strong, and the observation he made about his "brain<br />
function" being "not that great now", I'm convinced that it is due to difficulty remaining fully<br />
awake. When he does focus in, he's sharp as ever. His hands shake when he reaches for<br />
things. He is not getting IV nutrition, but he is on a liquid diet and has no desire to eat it.<br />
They probably put him back on IV nutrition tomorrow. His temperature is more or less<br />
normal (perhaps slightly high, like 99.2 or so). The nurse was laying out the treatment<br />
plan for the next few days, which is a signal that at this point the nurse is thinking things<br />
are improving.<br />
<strong>My</strong> <strong>Battle</strong> <strong>with</strong> <strong>Merkel</strong> <strong>Cell</strong> <strong>Cancer</strong>