12.07.2015 Views

US Government Debt Different - Finance Department - University of ...

US Government Debt Different - Finance Department - University of ...

US Government Debt Different - Finance Department - University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Peter R. Fishernot really an insurance company at all. It is an accident waiting tohappen.” (“Beyond Borrowing: Meeting the <strong>Government</strong>’s FinancialChallenges in the 21st Century”, Nov. 14, 2002 1 ) I was trying todraw attention to our unfunded retirement and health care commitmentsand to suggest that more attention be paid to the actuarialposition <strong>of</strong> the federal government. Draw attention I did, as punditsand journalists picked up on the stark comments <strong>of</strong> the senior Treasury<strong>of</strong>ficial responsible for federal debt.89As gloomy as I was then, looking back ten years, I could not haveimagined that over the next decade we would (1) triple federal debtoutstanding, (2) have the federal government explicitly assume theliabilities <strong>of</strong> Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac as wards <strong>of</strong> the state, and(3) vastly expand unfunded health care liabilities through both theMedicare drug benefit and universal coverage in the recent healthcare reform and the result would be that yields on the ten-year U.S.Treasury security would fall from 4.05 percent at the time <strong>of</strong> myspeech to below 2 percent today.I could not have imagined that outcome because <strong>of</strong> how trappedI would have been in a model that focused on supply. I wouldhave assumed that demand is roughly constant and that the risk tosustainability, or the risk <strong>of</strong> higher yields, would come from supply“overwhelming” demand. With the benefit <strong>of</strong> hindsight we cansee that while the current projected supply <strong>of</strong> federal debt is muchgreater, yields are lower not higher.The difference must be the behavior <strong>of</strong> demand. Contributing factorsappear to include (a) higher household and corporate savings,(b) stronger demand for the relative safety <strong>of</strong> Treasuries, (c) a muchlower supply <strong>of</strong> other “highly-rated” assets – as less credit is createdelsewhere in the economy, (d) weaker expected growth – in part because<strong>of</strong> the high level <strong>of</strong> debt, and (e) a much lower expected path<strong>of</strong> short-term interest rates.1 Remarks to the Columbus Council on World Affairs Columbus, Ohio, November14, 2002, available at http://www.truthinaccounting.org/national_reports/listing_article.asp?section=439&section2=458&page=458&CatID=7&ArticleSource=396.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!