12.07.2015 Views

US Government Debt Different - Finance Department - University of ...

US Government Debt Different - Finance Department - University of ...

US Government Debt Different - Finance Department - University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Charles W. Mooney, Jrtions Convention on Jurisdictional Immunities <strong>of</strong> States and theirProperty (U.N. Convention) contains a somewhat curious connectionrequirement. 160 The U.N. Convention excepts from immunityfrom execution:227property [that] is specifically in use or intended for use by theState for other than government non-commercial purposes andis in the territory <strong>of</strong> the State <strong>of</strong> the forum, provided that postjudgmentmeasures <strong>of</strong> constraint may only be taken againstproperty that has a connection with the entity against which theproceeding was directed. 161Under the U.N. Convention, a judgment creditor normally wouldnot be permitted to execute against the property <strong>of</strong> one agency orinstrumentality <strong>of</strong> a state to enforce a judgment against another,separate agency or instrumentality for want <strong>of</strong> a connection <strong>of</strong> thefirst entity’s property with the second entity. That is consistent withthe general rule that the assets <strong>of</strong> agencies and instrumentalities <strong>of</strong>a foreign state are immune from execution based on claims againstA required connection between the property sought for attachment and the underlyingclaim also appears in international conventions. See European Convention onState Immunity art 26, June 11, 1976, E.T.S. No. 74 (“a judgment rendered againsta Contracting State . . . may be enforced in the State <strong>of</strong> the forum against property<strong>of</strong> the State against which judgment has been given, used exclusively in connectionwith such an activity . . . .”); International Law Association: Draft Convention onState Immunity art. 8(A)(2), March 1983, 22 I.L.M. 287 (“The property is in usefor the purposes <strong>of</strong> commercial activity or was in use for the commercial activityupon which the claim is based”); International Law Commission Report on theDraft Articles Adopted at its Forty-Third Session art 18(1)(c), Sept. 11, 1991, 30I.L.M. 1554 [hereinafter Draft Articles on Jurisdictional Immunities <strong>of</strong> States and TheirProperty] (“the property is specifically in use or intended for use by the State forother than government non-commercial purposes and is in the territory <strong>of</strong> the State<strong>of</strong> the forum and has a connection with the claim”).160 United Nations Convention on the Jurisdictional Immunities <strong>of</strong> States andTheir Property, G.A. Res. 59/38, Annex, U.N. Doc. A/RES/59/38 (Dec. 2, 2004)(adopted without a vote) [hereinafter, U.N. Convention]. Resolutions <strong>of</strong> theGeneral Assembly are available at http://www.un.org/documents/resga.htm. TheU.N. Convention has 28 signatories and 13 parties, but 30 parties are requiredfor it to enter into force. Id. Art. 30(1); http://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=IND&mtdsg_no=III-13&chapter=3&lang=en.161 U.N. Convention, Art. 19(c).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!