12.07.2015 Views

US Government Debt Different - Finance Department - University of ...

US Government Debt Different - Finance Department - University of ...

US Government Debt Different - Finance Department - University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

292The 2011 <strong>Debt</strong> Limit Impasse: Treasury’s Actions & The Counterfactual – What Might Have Happened if the National <strong>Debt</strong> Hit the Statutory LimitClause may prevent Congress from rescinding or altering a statutoryappropriation; 237 an interpretation that allowed for such a conclusionwould not be plausible. Using the same logic, Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Tribe arguesthat “public debt” cannot include Social Security payments because,in Flemming v. Nestor, 238 “the Supreme Court held that Congresscould revise or repeal Social Security Act benefits even thoughthey had already been promised by prior legislation.” 239 Whilesome academics argue that “public debt” protects all contractualobligations, 240 Social Security beneficiaries contributed taxes, ratherthan voluntary payments pursuant to an agreement, and they havenot signed a written contract. 241In response to the argument that current “pensions” are part <strong>of</strong> the“public debt,” proponents <strong>of</strong> a narrow interpretation contend that,due to the fear that southern Democrats would refuse to pay backwar debts, the “pensions and bounties” phrase 242 was only necessaryto provide an unambiguous indication that those debts could notbe questioned. 243 On that view, the “including” phrase is limited tothose unique situations that involve the Civil War or, in a broaderview, the suppression <strong>of</strong> insurrections.This narrow construction <strong>of</strong> the Fourteenth Amendment to supportfavoring only bondholder payments was widely discussed as a validform <strong>of</strong> prioritization throughout the 2011 impasse. 244 On April 25,2011, in anticipation <strong>of</strong> reaching the debt limit, Matthew Zames,Chairman <strong>of</strong> the Treasury Borrowing Advisory Committee and aManaging Director at J.P. Morgan Chase, wrote Secretary Geithner,warning that “any delay in making an interest or principal paymentby Treasury even for a very short period <strong>of</strong> time . . . could trigger237See Abramowicz, supra note 103, at 43-44.238363 U.S. 603 (1960).239Tribe, supra note 144.240See Abramowicz, supra note 103, at 20-21.241Id. at 43-44. Although the contributions to Social Security and Medicare are tied to thebenefits received, they are a tax rather than a contractual agreement. Id.242U.S. Const. amend. XIV, § 4: “The validity <strong>of</strong> the public debt <strong>of</strong> the United States, authorizedby law, including debts incurred for payment <strong>of</strong> pensions and bounties for services in suppressinginsurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned.” (emphasis added).243See Abramowicz, supra note 103, at 20.244Letter from Jim DeMint, et. al., U.S. Senate, to Timothy Geithner, Secretary <strong>of</strong> theTreasury (May 26, 2011) (available at http://www.demint.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?ContentRecord_id=7371d3a9-9435-4277-87ef-330fcf689087&p=PressReleases).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!