12.07.2015 Views

US Government Debt Different - Finance Department - University of ...

US Government Debt Different - Finance Department - University of ...

US Government Debt Different - Finance Department - University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

70 A Market for End-<strong>of</strong>-the-World Insurance? Credit Default Swaps on <strong>US</strong> <strong>Government</strong> <strong>Debt</strong>Currently, a much smaller percentage <strong>of</strong> <strong>US</strong> government debt iscovered by CDS than is the debt <strong>of</strong> other large sovereign borrowers.To many observers, the relative paucity <strong>of</strong> CDS on <strong>US</strong> Treasurydebt—called here “CDS on <strong>US</strong>A”—has a simple explanation: counterpartycredit risk. CDS protection sellers tend to be large financialinstitutions, many <strong>of</strong> which might end up insolvent if the <strong>US</strong> everdefaulted on its national debt. The implication is that CDS on <strong>US</strong>Ais like end-<strong>of</strong>-the-world insurance sold by Earth-bound insurers. Ifthe world actually blew up, surely it would take the insurers with it.While this standard explanation for the relative scarcity <strong>of</strong> CDS on<strong>US</strong>A has a superficial appeal, it is based on a misunderstanding <strong>of</strong>what actually happens under <strong>US</strong> insolvency law when a firm withopen derivatives positions fails. Rather than recovering nothing, thefirm’s derivatives counterparties enjoy preferential treatment thattypically ensures them substantial payouts on their claims. Thus,even if there is a strong correlation between the risk that liabilityon a CDS contract will be triggered and the risk that the protectionseller will then be insolvent, it does not follow that the contract hasno value. The explanation for the unusual thinness <strong>of</strong> the market forCDS on <strong>US</strong>A seems to lie elsewhere.A high correlation between the liability risk on a CDS contract andthe protection seller’s insolvency risk does, however, have a different—andmore troubling—implication. The shareholders <strong>of</strong> such aprotection seller enjoy the upside from the CDS sale, as the feescharged to the protection buyer augment the seller’s pr<strong>of</strong>its. Andthe shareholders are indifferent to the possibility that liability on thecontract will be triggered, because by assumption the seller will thenbe insolvent anyway. Thus, the downside on the contract is borne notby the seller’s shareholders but rather by its general creditors, whoserecoveries from the protection seller’s bankruptcy estate are dilutedby the protection buyer’s recovery. Besides transferring expected valuefrom creditors to shareholders, CDS sales <strong>of</strong> this type can distortmarkets, causing CDS prices to understate the probability <strong>of</strong> defaulton the reference debt, and CDS liability to be concentrated in ahandful <strong>of</strong> systemically important firms.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!