12.07.2015 Views

US Government Debt Different - Finance Department - University of ...

US Government Debt Different - Finance Department - University of ...

US Government Debt Different - Finance Department - University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

8 U.S. <strong>Government</strong> <strong>Debt</strong> Has Always Been <strong>Different</strong>!For the first century and a half <strong>of</strong> U.S. history, from the 1780s to the1930s, the prevailing sentiment was that national debt ought to bepaid down whenever possible. The debt rose mostly in times <strong>of</strong> war,and was paid down in times <strong>of</strong> peace. The driving force, however,was less the sentiment that debts should be paid and more the rapidgrowth <strong>of</strong> the U.S. economy which swelled federal revenues, makingdebt reduction possible. <strong>Debt</strong> reduction probably added to capitalformation, making the country grow even faster than it would havewithout paying down the national debt. In real terms, more waspaid back at low prices in times <strong>of</strong> peace than was borrowed whenprices were high in times <strong>of</strong> war. But debt reduction may itself haveadded to financial instabilities by creating credit booms and busts.4. U.S. <strong>Debt</strong> as Backing for U.S. currencyThe U.S. national debt served as backing for a large part <strong>of</strong> U.S. currencyfrom the 1860s to the 1930s. Civil War legislation in 1863 and1864 created the National Banking System and related legislation in1865 taxed currency issued by state banks out <strong>of</strong> existence. The U.S.finally had a national currency issued either by the Treasury in theform <strong>of</strong> U.S. notes (greenbacks) or by national banks in the form <strong>of</strong>national bank notes. Both were liabilities <strong>of</strong> the federal government.National bank notes were printed by the government, but stampedwith the names <strong>of</strong> national banks that to issue notes had to buy governmentbonds and deposit them with a federal <strong>of</strong>fice, the Comptroller<strong>of</strong> the Currency, as collateral backing the notes. Then, if abank failed, the holders <strong>of</strong> its notes would suffer no loss because thecollateral would be liquidated and the proceeds would be used to pay<strong>of</strong>f the note holders.In principle, this was a good system for making the paper currency <strong>of</strong>the country safer than it had been when it was issued by thousands<strong>of</strong> independent banks before 1863. In fact, it was copied (althoughsoon abandoned) by other countries such as Japan and Argentina.In the U.S., however, the policy <strong>of</strong> backing national bank notes withgovernment bonds clashed with the policy <strong>of</strong> redeeming the nationaldebt, which reduced the amount <strong>of</strong> collateral available for banks to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!