12.07.2015 Views

US Government Debt Different - Finance Department - University of ...

US Government Debt Different - Finance Department - University of ...

US Government Debt Different - Finance Department - University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Donald S. Bernsteinis what most bankruptcies do. They permit a distressed debtor t<strong>of</strong>ree itself from its valid debts to restore the debtor’s financial health. 3On this view, there is nothing inconsistent between the FourteenthAmendment and the discharge <strong>of</strong> debts <strong>of</strong> the United States pursuantto the bankruptcy power conferred on Congress.239As a corporate reorganization lawyer, nothing appeals to me morethan the idea that the bankruptcy clause <strong>of</strong> the Constitution, mystock in trade, trumps all, and, from the point <strong>of</strong> view <strong>of</strong> a commerciallaw expert, Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Mooney’s distinction between validityand enforceability rings true. I was for a number <strong>of</strong> years the Chair<strong>of</strong> the TriBar Opinion Committee, which is the leading bar organizationsetting standards for third-party legal opinions rendered bylaw firms, and the idea that bankruptcy affects the enforceability <strong>of</strong>a debt but not its validity is consistent with customary legal opinionpractice.Still, I have misgivings about Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Mooney’s broad reading <strong>of</strong>the bankruptcy clause <strong>of</strong> the Constitution. The proposition that, inthe face <strong>of</strong> the Fourteenth Amendment, the United States can passa law to declare itself bankrupt and then impose a “bankruptcy repudiation”<strong>of</strong> its own debts feels like “bootstrapping.” Though thereis scant historical record, it appears that the bankruptcy clause wasintended to permit Congress to preempt the hodgepodge <strong>of</strong> lawsthe several states applied to their own bankrupt citizens, allowingthe marshaling <strong>of</strong> debtors’ assets and resolution <strong>of</strong> debts across statelines. This undoubtedly accounts for the reference to “uniform laws”in the text <strong>of</strong> the clause. 4 It is difficult to see how the bankruptcy3 This <strong>of</strong> course is typically in the interest <strong>of</strong> the debtor’s creditors in a reorganizationcase under Chapter 11 <strong>of</strong> the federal Bankruptcy Code because the going concernvalue <strong>of</strong> the enterprise is preserved and made available in the form <strong>of</strong> equity tothe holders <strong>of</strong> discharged claims.4 That the Fourteenth Amendment was directed at allowing Congress to reconcilethe differences among the states’ bankruptcy laws is apparent from the brief referenceto the bankruptcy clause in The Federalist Papers. In Federalist No. 42, Madisonstates that:“The power <strong>of</strong> establishing uniform laws <strong>of</strong> bankruptcy is so intimately connectedwith the regulation <strong>of</strong> commerce, and will prevent so many frauds where theparties or their properties may lie or be removed into different States, that theexpediency <strong>of</strong> it seems not likely to be drawn into question.”The Federalist No. 42 (James Madison) (the powers conferred by the Constitutionfurther considered).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!