12.07.2015 Views

US Government Debt Different - Finance Department - University of ...

US Government Debt Different - Finance Department - University of ...

US Government Debt Different - Finance Department - University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Jim Millsteinwould likely command a premium to that estimate if it was sold toprivate companies.165The <strong>US</strong> government could do even better selling its mineral rightsin the states. Recent political debate has focused on whether to exploitresources located under the Coastal Plain <strong>of</strong> the Arctic NationalWildlife Refuge. According to Arctic Power, a non-pr<strong>of</strong>it organization<strong>of</strong> Alaskan companies in a variety <strong>of</strong> industries, lease sale revenues,royalties, and taxes to the Federal government from developingthe Coastal Plain could be between $89 billion and $244 billion. 21The <strong>US</strong> Chamber <strong>of</strong> Commerce puts the upper estimate at $167 billion.22 In 1985, Boskin et al. estimated that the value <strong>of</strong> all Federaloil and gas rights in Alaska was $335 billion, 23 an estimate that mustbe viewed as conservative, given discoveries and improvements inextraction technology since.So $500 billion to $600 billion would appear to be the minimumthe Federal <strong>Government</strong> could obtain from the sale <strong>of</strong> all Federalland and mineral rights in Alaska. If applied to the reduction <strong>of</strong> theFederal <strong>Government</strong>’s outstanding indebtedness, that would representabout five percent <strong>of</strong> the $10.9 trillion <strong>of</strong> <strong>US</strong> debt currently heldby the public, reducing debt as a share <strong>of</strong> GDP to 64 percent.The <strong>US</strong> government could take a more aggressive approach to Alaska’smineral and land rights. The state’s share <strong>of</strong> oil revenues is between2 to 2.5 times the Federal government’s share. If the Federalgovernment expropriated the state’s mineral rights as well, then thecombined public mineral rights could be valued between $1 trillionto $1.2 trillion. Similarly, land rights currently held by the Statecould be worth between $100 billion and $150 billion. Transferringfederal sovereignty over the territory as a whole therefore might gar-21 See anwr.org. The organization also argues that developing the Coastal Plaincould further decrease <strong>US</strong> reliance on oil imports and create between 250,000 and750,000 jobs.22 Issue Advertisment, Feb. 28, 2012, available at http://www.uschamber.com/ads/mr-president-make-american-energy-next-big-thing.23 Boskin, M. et al., New Estimates <strong>of</strong> the Value <strong>of</strong> Federal Mineral Rights and Land,American Economic Review, 75, pp. 923-936, 1985; see also Boskin, M. and Robinson,M., The Value <strong>of</strong> Federal Mineral Rights, Correction and Update, AmericanEconomic Review, 77, pp.1073-1074, 1987.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!