13.07.2015 Views

Improving Quality of Life for Older People in Long-Stay Care ...

Improving Quality of Life for Older People in Long-Stay Care ...

Improving Quality of Life for Older People in Long-Stay Care ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

There<strong>for</strong>e, the practice <strong>of</strong> roster<strong>in</strong>g most nurs<strong>in</strong>g staff <strong>in</strong> the morn<strong>in</strong>g and m<strong>in</strong>imumnurs<strong>in</strong>g staff <strong>in</strong> the even<strong>in</strong>g was discarded and new staff rotas implementedto enable residents to get up and go back to bed at their desired time. In somefacilities, mealtimes were staggered and activities were at different times <strong>of</strong> theday to meet residents’ preferences.In some facilities, both public and private, resident and staff respondentscommented on the car<strong>in</strong>g ethos and how this shaped care with<strong>in</strong> the facility.In some facilities this ethos was based on resident <strong>in</strong>clusion <strong>in</strong> decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g,maximis<strong>in</strong>g resident capacity, facilitat<strong>in</strong>g choice and keep<strong>in</strong>g residents <strong>in</strong>volved.The manager’s role <strong>in</strong> shap<strong>in</strong>g this ethos was commented on by staff and residents.One manager described the difficult and challeng<strong>in</strong>g path <strong>of</strong> implement<strong>in</strong>g a newethos <strong>of</strong> care and the time, commitment and support needed to see it through.Another manager described how the ethos pervaded all aspects <strong>of</strong> management<strong>of</strong> the facility. She described how this ethos <strong>in</strong>volved car<strong>in</strong>g <strong>for</strong> staff and <strong>in</strong>vest<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong> tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and <strong>in</strong>duction so that the best care could be delivered <strong>for</strong> residents.In other facilities, aga<strong>in</strong> both public and private, care was described as rout<strong>in</strong>isedand focused on tasks. In these facilities care was perceived as focus<strong>in</strong>g mostlyon the physical aspects. Some staff were concerned that the social and emotionalneeds <strong>of</strong> residents were not be<strong>in</strong>g met. In some <strong>of</strong> these facilities, it was evidentthat there was a real desire to change care practices but that many constra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>gfactors had held back the pace <strong>of</strong> change (Table 8.4). In these facilities staffexpressed the need <strong>for</strong> change <strong>in</strong> the rout<strong>in</strong>e <strong>of</strong> care and their frustration that littleprogress had been made. In other facilities the focus on rout<strong>in</strong>e had become soembedded, staff could not see how it could change. They expla<strong>in</strong>ed that currentstaff<strong>in</strong>g levels and resources made change impossible. A few staff respondentsquestioned the commitment <strong>of</strong> some staff to change and suggested that a fewstaff were not motivated to care <strong>for</strong> older people.163

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!