13.07.2015 Views

Improving Quality of Life for Older People in Long-Stay Care ...

Improving Quality of Life for Older People in Long-Stay Care ...

Improving Quality of Life for Older People in Long-Stay Care ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

For residents, what appeared to be important was that activities were structured tomeet their <strong>in</strong>terests and capacities, and that they were <strong>in</strong>tegrated <strong>in</strong>to the everydaylife <strong>of</strong> the facility. It was also important that activities were changed regularly. Thosewho did participate <strong>in</strong> activities <strong>of</strong>ten demonstrated personal <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> the activityand appeared to prefer activities which were structured <strong>in</strong>to small groups <strong>of</strong> likem<strong>in</strong>dedpeople. The success <strong>of</strong> activities appeared to h<strong>in</strong>ge on two factors: firstly,that the residents’ <strong>in</strong>terests were known and taken <strong>in</strong>to account <strong>in</strong> the determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<strong>of</strong> activities; secondly, that residents perceived that there were other residentswho had similar <strong>in</strong>terests and capacities who also participated <strong>in</strong> that activity.It was important, there<strong>for</strong>e, that those organis<strong>in</strong>g activities knew the residents’<strong>in</strong>terests and capacities. In some large facilities, when activities were providedby an activities department, it was less likely that residents were known well.Staff respondents also highlighted that activities were mostly <strong>for</strong> those residentswho were mobile enough to go to the day or activities room. Residents who werebedbound or who spent long periods <strong>in</strong> bed, there<strong>for</strong>e, rarely had the opportunityto participate <strong>in</strong> activities.11.6 Conclusions209This chapter presented f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs related to activities and therapies with<strong>in</strong> long-staycare. It was evident that there were widespread differences <strong>in</strong> the provision <strong>of</strong>activities across study sites. Some sites had an extensive range <strong>of</strong> activities whileothers provided little by way <strong>of</strong> activities. Some residents, there<strong>for</strong>e, had goodopportunities to pursue mean<strong>in</strong>gful activities while others did not. It was evidentthat some residents’ days were long and bor<strong>in</strong>g. Consequently, these residentswere <strong>of</strong>ten frustrated and disengaged. Residents were most likely to participate<strong>in</strong> activities which were designed to take <strong>in</strong>to account their own particular <strong>in</strong>terests.The absence <strong>of</strong> occupational therapy and physiotherapy were highlighted asparticular concerns by both residents and staff.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!