The Genom of Homo sapiens.pdf

More documents

Recommendations

Info

HUMAN CHROMOSOME 1p IN THE DOG 177linkage map of the domestic dog genome to all chromosomes.Genome Res. 11: 1784.Credille K.M., Venta P.J., Breen M., Lowe J.K., Murphy K.E.,Ostrander E.A., Galibert F., and Dunstan R.W. 2001. DNAsequence and physical mapping of the canine transglutaminase1 gene. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 93: 73.Guyon R., Lorentzen T.D., Hitte C., Kim L., Cadieu E., ParkerH.G., Quignon P., Lowe J.K., Renier C., Gelfenbeyn B., VignauxG., DeFrance H.B., Gloux S., Mahairas G.G., André C.,Galibert F., and Ostrander E.A. 2003. A 1 Mb resolution radiationhybrid map of the canine genome. Proc. Natl. Acad.Sci. 100: 5296.Haworth K.E., Islam I., Breen M., Putt W., Makrinou E., BinnsM., Hopkinson D., and Edwards Y. 2001. Canine TCOF1;cloning, chromosome assignment and genetic analysis in dogswith different head types. Mamm. Genome 12: 622.Hitte C., Lorentzen T., Guyon R., Kim L., Cadieu E., Parker H.,Quignon P., Lowe J., Gelfenbeyn B., André C., OstranderE.A., and Galibert F. 2003. Comparison of the MultiMap andTSP/CONCORDE packages for constructing radiation hybridmaps. J. Hered. 94: 9.Kirkness E.F., Bafna V., Halpern A.L., Levy S., Remington K.,Rusch D.B., Delcher A.L., Pop M., Wang W., Fraser C.M.,and Venter J.C. 2003. The dog genome: Survey sequencingand comparative analysis. Science 301: 1854.Lander E. and Waterman M. 1988. Genomic mapping by fingerprintingrandom clones: A mathematical analysis. Genomics2: 231.Matise T.C., Perlin M., and Chakravarti A. 1994. Automatedconstruction of genetic linkage maps using an expert system(MultiMap): A human genome linkage map. Nat. Genet. 6:384.Mellersh C.S., Hitte C., Richman M., Vignaux F., Priat C.,Jouquand S., Werner P., André C., DeRose S., Patterson D.F.,Ostrander E.A., and Galibert F. 2000. An integrated linkageradiationhybrid map of the canine genome. Mamm. Genome11: 120.Murphy W.J., Sun S., Chen Z., Yuhki N., Hirschmann D.,Menotti-Raymond M., and O’Brien S.J. 2000. A radiation hybridmap of the cat genome: Implications for comparativemapping. Genome Res. 10: 691.O’Brien S.J. and Stanyon R. 1999. Phylogenomics. Ancestralprimate viewed. Nature 402: 365.O’Brien S.J., Eisenberg J.F., Miyamoto M., Hedges S.B., KumarS., Wilson D.E., Menotti-Raymond M., Murphy W.J., NashW.G., Lyons L.A., Menninger, J.C., Stanyon R., Wienberg J.,Copeland N.G., Jenkins N.A., Gellin J., Yerle M., AnderssonL., Womack J., Broad T., Postlethwait J., Serov O., Bailey E.,James M.R., and Marshall Graves J.A., et al. 1999. Genomemaps 10. Comparative genomics. Mammalian radiations.Wall chart. Science 286: 463.Okazaki Y., Furuno M., Kasukawa T., Adachi J., Bono H.,Kondo S., Nikaido I., Osato N., Saito R., Suzuki H., YamanakaI., Kiyosawa H., Yagi K., Tomaru Y., Hasegawa Y.,Nogami A., Schonbach C., Gojobori T., Baldarelli R., HillD.P., Bult C., Hume D.A., Quackenbush J., Schriml L.M., andKanapin A., et al. (FANTOM Consortium; RIKEN GenomeExploration Research Group Phase I & II Team). 2002. Analysisof the mouse transcriptome based on functional annotationof 60,770 full-length cDNAs. Nature 420: 563.Parker H.G., Yuhua X., Mellersh C.S., Khan S., Shibuya H.,Johnson G.S., and Ostrander E.A. 2001. Meiotic linkage mappingof 52 genes onto the canine map does not identify significantlevels of microrearrangement. Mamm. Genome 12:713.Priat C., Hitte C., Vignaux F., Renier C., Jiang Z., Jouquand S.,Cheron A., André C., and Galibert F. 1998. A whole-genomeradiation hybrid map of the dog genome. Genomics 54: 361.Sargan D.R., Yang F., Squire M., Milne B.S., O’Brien P.C., andFerguson-Smith M.A. 2000. Use of flow-sorted canine chromosomesin the assignment of canine linkage, radiation hybrid,and syntenic groups to chromosomes: Refinement andverification of the comparative chromosome map for dog andhuman. Genomics 69: 182.Szabo C.I., Wagner LA., Francisco L.V., Roach J.C., ArgonzaR., King M.C., and Ostrander E.A. 1996. Human, canine andmurine BRCA1 genes: Sequence comparison among species.Hum. Mol. Genet. 5: 1289.Venter J.C., Adams M.D., Myers E.W., Li P.W., Mural R.J., SuttonG.G., Smith H.O., Yandell M., Evans C.A., Holt R.A.,Gocayne J.D., Amanatides P., Ballew R.M., Huson D.H.,Wortman J.R., Zhang Q., Kodira C.D., Zheng X.H., Chen L.,Skupski M., Subramanian G., Thomas P.D., Zhang J., GaborMiklos G.L., and Nelson C., et al. 2001. The sequence of thehuman genome. Science 291: 1304.Vignaux F., Hitte C., Priat C., Chuat J.C., André C., and GalibertF. 1999. Construction and optimization of a dog wholegenomeradiation hybrid panel. Mamm. Genome 10: 888.Vinogradov A.E. 1998. Genome size and GC-percent in vertebratesas determined by flow cytometry: The triangular relationship.Cytometry 31: 100.Waterston R.H., Lindblad-Toh K., Birney E., Rogers J., AbrilJ.F., Agarwal P., Agarwala R., Ainscough R., AlexanderssonM., An P., Antonarakis S.E., Attwood J., Baertsch R., BaileyJ., Barlow K., Beck S., Berry E., Birren B., Bloom T., BorkP., Botcherby M., Bray N., Brent M.R., Brown D.G., andBrown S.D., et al. (Mouse Genome Sequencing Consortium).2002. Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of themouse genome. Nature 420: 520.Wayne R.K. 1993. Molecular evolution of the dog family.Trends Genet. 9: 218.Wayne R.K., Nash W.G., and O’Brien S.J. 1987. Chromosomalevolution of the Canidae. II. Divergence from the primitivecarnivore karyotype. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 44: 134.Yang F., Graphodatsky A.S., O’Brien P.C., Colabella A.,Solanky N., Squire M., Sargan D.R., and Ferguson-SmithM.A. 2000. Reciprocal chromosome painting illuminates thehistory of genome evolution of the domestic cat, dog and human.Chromosome Res. 8: 393-404.Yang F., O’Brien P.C., Milne B.S., Graphodatsky A.S., SolankyN., Trifonov V., Rens W., Sargan D., and Ferguson-SmithM.A. 1999. A complete comparative chromosome map forthe dog, red fox, and human and its integration with caninegenetic maps. Genomics 62: 189.WEB SITE REFERENCEShttp://www.tigr.org/softlab/assembler/(The Institute for GenomicResearch TIGR Assembler 2.0 website).http://genome.ucsc.edu/ (University of California, Santa CruzGenome Bioinformatics website).http://www-genome.wi.mit.edu/cgi-bin/primer/primer3_www.cgi (Whitehead Institute/MIT Center forGenome Research Primer 3 website).http://www-recomgen.univ-rennes1.fr/doggy.html (UMR-CNRS 6061, Universite de Rennes Canine Radiation HybridProject website).http://www.fhcrc.org/science/dog_genome/dog.html (FredHutchinson Cancer Research Center Dog Genome Projectwebsite).http://www.math.princeton.edu/tsp/concorde.html (TSP/CON-CORDE Home webpage).http://www.ncbi.nih.nlm.gov/blast (NCBI web site).
Page 6 and 7:
ForewordIn 2001, as we considered t
Page 8:
The Finished Genome Sequence of Hom
Page 11 and 12:
4 ROGERSFigure 2. Accumulation of h
Page 13 and 14:
6 ROGERSFigure 4. Sequencing center
Page 15 and 16:
8 ROGERSabcFigure 5. Ensembl view o
Page 17 and 18:
10 ROGERS2000. Analysis of vertebra
Page 20 and 21:
The Human Genome: Genes, Pseudogene
Page 22 and 23:
VARIATION ON CHROMOSOME 7 15rived f
Page 24 and 25:
VARIATION ON CHROMOSOME 7 17DNAs an
Page 26 and 27:
VARIATION ON CHROMOSOME 7 19expecte
Page 28 and 29:
VARIATION ON CHROMOSOME 7 21Drosoph
Page 30 and 31:
Mutational Profiling in the Human G
Page 32 and 33:
HUMAN MUTATIONAL PROFILING 25Anothe
Page 34 and 35:
HUMAN MUTATIONAL PROFILING 27Figure
Page 36:
HUMAN MUTATIONAL PROFILING 29Rieder
Page 39 and 40:
32 SCHMUTZ ET AL.algorithm itself,
Page 41 and 42:
34 SCHMUTZ ET AL.Figure 2. Genomic
Page 43 and 44:
36 SCHMUTZ ET AL.compared. Some of
Page 46 and 47:
Human Subtelomeric DNAH. RIETHMAN,
Page 48 and 49:
HUMAN SUBTELOMERIC SEQUENCES 41The
Page 50 and 51:
HUMAN SUBTELOMERIC SEQUENCES 43cate
Page 52 and 53:
HUMAN SUBTELOMERIC SEQUENCES 45Figu
Page 54:
HUMAN SUBTELOMERIC SEQUENCES 47pres
Page 57 and 58:
50 COLLINSand expand the genomics r
Page 59 and 60:
52 COLLINSFigure 2. A public-sector
Page 61 and 62:
54 COLLINSdefine all the parts of t
Page 63 and 64:
56 BENTLEYmon over many generations
Page 65 and 66:
58 BENTLEYTable 1. Genetic Disease
Page 67 and 68:
60 BENTLEY(Clark et al. 1998; Reich
Page 69 and 70:
62 BENTLEYACKNOWLEDGMENTSThe author
Page 72 and 73:
SNP Genotyping and Molecular Haplot
Page 74:
GENETIC ANALYSIS OF DNA POOLS 67gen
Page 77 and 78:
70 FAN ET AL.matrix is then mated t
Page 79 and 80:
72 FAN ET AL.Figure 3. Views of gen
Page 81 and 82:
74 FAN ET AL.including 32 duplicate
Page 83 and 84:
76 FAN ET AL.Figure 7. Allele-speci
Page 85 and 86:
78 FAN ET AL.microsphere-based assa
Page 87 and 88:
80 BERTRANPETIT ET AL.function, may
Page 89 and 90:
82 BERTRANPETIT ET AL.diversity in
Page 91 and 92:
84 BERTRANPETIT ET AL.gree of block
Page 93 and 94:
86 BERTRANPETIT ET AL.Figure 1. Dec
Page 95 and 96:
88 BERTRANPETIT ET AL.1999. Populat
Page 97 and 98:
90 WINDEMUTH ET AL.Expression data.
Page 99 and 100:
92 WINDEMUTH ET AL.Table 1. A Summa
Page 101 and 102:
94 WINDEMUTH ET AL.Table 2. Signifi
Page 103 and 104:
96 WINDEMUTH ET AL.Table 3. Summary
Page 105 and 106:
98 WINDEMUTH ET AL.Table 6. List of
Page 107 and 108:
100 WINDEMUTH ET AL.Table 6. (Conti
Page 109 and 110:
102 WINDEMUTH ET AL.Table 6. (Conti
Page 111 and 112:
104 WINDEMUTH ET AL.much of a surpr
Page 113 and 114:
106 WINDEMUTH ET AL.Given our resul
Page 116 and 117:
Genetic Variation and the Control o
Page 118 and 119:
GENETIC CONTROL OF TRANSCRIPTION 11
Page 120 and 121:
GENETIC CONTROL OF TRANSCRIPTION 11
Page 122 and 123:
Genome-wide Detection and Analysis
Page 124 and 125:
RECENT SEGMENTAL DUPLICATIONS 117Fi
Page 126 and 127:
RECENT SEGMENTAL DUPLICATIONS 119St
Page 128 and 129:
RECENT SEGMENTAL DUPLICATIONS 121Co
Page 130 and 131:
RECENT SEGMENTAL DUPLICATIONS 123Ho
Page 132 and 133:
The Effects of Evolutionary Distanc
Page 134 and 135: EVOLUTIONARY DISTANCE AND GENE PRED
Page 136 and 137: EVOLUTIONARY DISTANCE AND GENE PRED
Page 138 and 139: Lineage-specific Expansion of KRAB
Page 140 and 141: EVOLUTION OF ZNF GENES 133Figure 2.
Page 142 and 143: EVOLUTION OF ZNF GENES 135Figure 4.
Page 144 and 145: EVOLUTION OF ZNF GENES 137get gene,
Page 146 and 147: EVOLUTION OF ZNF GENES 139Y., Goodw
Page 148 and 149: Sequence Organization and Functiona
Page 150 and 151: CENTROMERE ANNOTATION 143THE CENTRO
Page 152 and 153: CENTROMERE ANNOTATION 145Figure 4.
Page 154 and 155: CENTROMERE ANNOTATION 147CONCLUSION
Page 156: CENTROMERE ANNOTATION 149Schueler M
Page 159 and 160: 152 PARKHILL AND THOMSONFigure 1. T
Page 161 and 162: 154 PARKHILL AND THOMSONshow very h
Page 163 and 164: 156 PARKHILL AND THOMSONGene Loss a
Page 165 and 166: 158 PARKHILL AND THOMSONYersinia ad
Page 167 and 168: 160 MCKAY ET AL.Choosing Candidate
Page 169 and 170: 162 MCKAY ET AL.new comparative too
Page 171 and 172: 164 MCKAY ET AL.rich. Based on a th
Page 173 and 174: 166 MCKAY ET AL.Embryonic Muscle an
Page 175 and 176: 168 MCKAY ET AL.native polyadenylat
Page 178 and 179: Building Comparative Maps Using 1.5
Page 180 and 181: HUMAN CHROMOSOME 1p IN THE DOG 1731
Page 182 and 183: HUMAN CHROMOSOME 1p IN THE DOG 175(
Page 186 and 187: Positional Identification of Struct
Page 188 and 189: IDENTIFYING LIVESTOCK QTN 181initia
Page 190 and 191: IDENTIFYING LIVESTOCK QTN 183tation
Page 192 and 193: IDENTIFYING LIVESTOCK QTN 185The fa
Page 194: IDENTIFYING LIVESTOCK QTN 187Farnir
Page 197 and 198: 190 GIBBS AND WEINSTOCKBACATLASWGSF
Page 199 and 200: 192 GIBBS AND WEINSTOCKsentation of
Page 201 and 202: 194 GIBBS AND WEINSTOCKCONCLUSIONSE
Page 203 and 204: 196 HAYASHIZAKIFigure 1. Strategy f
Page 205 and 206: 198 HAYASHIZAKIpasses per day. Ther
Page 207 and 208: 200 HAYASHIZAKIto known genes. As s
Page 209 and 210: 202 HAYASHIZAKIaged small amounts o
Page 211 and 212: 204 HAYASHIZAKIanalysis of more tha
Page 213 and 214: 206 ZHANG AND WATERMAN(a)Repeat Rep
Page 215 and 216: 208 ZHANG AND WATERMAN501234301245(
Page 217 and 218: 210 ZHANG AND WATERMANing and Green
Page 219 and 220: 212 ZHANG AND WATERMANACKNOWLEDGMEN
Page 221 and 222: 214 BIRNEY ET AL.Table 1. General I
Page 224 and 225: Prediction, Annotation, and Analysi
Page 226 and 227: ANALYSIS OF HUMAN PROMOTERS 219Inte
Page 228 and 229: ANALYSIS OF HUMAN PROMOTERS 221Figu
Page 230 and 231: ANALYSIS OF HUMAN PROMOTERS 223nacc
Page 232: ANALYSIS OF HUMAN PROMOTERS 225E2F
Page 235 and 236:
228 ASHBURNER ET AL.cally meaningfu
Page 237 and 238:
230 ASHBURNER ET AL.man protein ann
Page 239 and 240:
232 ASHBURNER ET AL.associations be
Page 241 and 242:
234 ASHBURNER ET AL.cabulary for th
Page 244 and 245:
The Genome Knowledgebase: A Resourc
Page 246 and 247:
THE GENOME KNOWLEDGEBASE 239Figure
Page 248 and 249:
THE GENOME KNOWLEDGEBASE 241by the
Page 250:
THE GENOME KNOWLEDGEBASE 243Karp P.
Page 253 and 254:
246 CHIAROMONTE ET AL.We make no pa
Page 255 and 256:
248 CHIAROMONTE ET AL.Figure 1. Smo
Page 257 and 258:
250 CHIAROMONTE ET AL.can use this
Page 259 and 260:
252 CHIAROMONTE ET AL.However, we c
Page 261 and 262:
254 CHIAROMONTE ET AL.Ihaka R. and
Page 263 and 264:
256 MARGULIES ET AL.HumanMouseFuguR
Page 265 and 266:
258 MARGULIES ET AL.Base Position 1
Page 267 and 268:
260 MARGULIES ET AL.Figure 4. Gener
Page 269 and 270:
262 MARGULIES ET AL.CONCLUSIONSWith
Page 272 and 273:
Comparative Analysis of Human Chrom
Page 274 and 275:
COMPARATIVE GENOMIC ANALYSIS 267aBa
Page 276 and 277:
COMPARATIVE GENOMIC ANALYSIS 269µg
Page 278 and 279:
COMPARATIVE GENOMIC ANALYSIS 271aHu
Page 280 and 281:
COMPARATIVE GENOMIC ANALYSIS 273___
Page 282 and 283:
Genome-wide Analyses Based on Compa
Page 284 and 285:
WHOLE-GENOME COMPARISONS 277Figure
Page 286 and 287:
WHOLE-GENOME COMPARISONS 279Table 2
Page 288 and 289:
WHOLE-GENOME COMPARISONS 281models
Page 290 and 291:
Comparative Genomic Tools for Explo
Page 292 and 293:
COMPUTATIONAL TOOLS FOR ANALYZING G
Page 294 and 295:
Page 296 and 297:
Page 298:
Page 301 and 302:
294 ROGOZIN ET AL.BeTs are combined
Page 303 and 304:
296 ROGOZIN ET AL.Dm Hs Ce Sc Sp Ec
Page 305 and 306:
298 ROGOZIN ET AL.Dm Ag Hs Ce Sc Sp
Page 307 and 308:
300 ROGOZIN ET AL.gene lossgene gai
Page 310 and 311:
Human-Mouse Comparative Genomics: S
Page 312 and 313:
HUMAN-MOUSE COMPARATIVE GENOMICS 30
Page 314 and 315:
Page 316:
Page 320 and 321:
MOUSE KNOCKOUTS ILLUSTRATE FUNCTION
Page 322:
MOUSE KNOCKOUTS ILLUSTRATE FUNCTION
Page 325 and 326:
318 LIAN ET AL.0 12 34 5 6 78 9 101
Page 327 and 328:
320 LIAN ET AL.90 minutes and the c
Page 329 and 330:
322 LIAN ET AL.Iyer V.I., Horak C.A
Page 331 and 332:
324 LI ET AL.Figure 1. Array-based
Page 333 and 334:
326 LI ET AL.Figure 4. Test of quan
Page 335 and 336:
328 LI ET AL.Figure 5. Comparison o
Page 338 and 339:
Annotation of Novel Proteins Utiliz
Page 340 and 341:
FUNCTIONAL SHOTGUN SEQUENCING 333Fi
Page 342 and 343:
Global Predictions and Tests of Ery
Page 344 and 345:
PREDICTING GENE REGULATORY REGIONS
Page 346 and 347:
Page 348 and 349:
Page 350 and 351:
Page 352 and 353:
Systems Approaches Applied to the S
Page 354 and 355:
SYSTEMS BIOLOGY IN S. CEREVISIAE AN
Page 356 and 357:
Page 358 and 359:
Page 360 and 361:
Page 362 and 363:
Page 364:
Page 367 and 368:
360 MERIKANGASidentification of gen
Page 369 and 370:
362 MERIKANGASDay 1984; Ottman 1990
Page 371 and 372:
364 MERIKANGASPrevention Research G
Page 373 and 374:
366 DRAYNA ET AL.Figure 1. Distribu
Page 375 and 376:
368 DRAYNA ET AL.Table 1. Summary o
Page 377 and 378:
370 DRAYNA ET AL.Figure 5. Predicte
Page 380 and 381:
Genomic Variation in Multigenic Tra
Page 382 and 383:
GENOMIC VARIATION IN MULTIGENIC TRA
Page 384 and 385:
Page 386 and 387:
Page 388:
Page 391 and 392:
384 PORTEOUS ET AL.of these devasta
Page 393 and 394:
386 PORTEOUS ET AL.Figure 2. The t(
Page 395 and 396:
388 PORTEOUS ET AL.Figure 3. DISC1
Page 397 and 398:
390 PORTEOUS ET AL.cgi-bin/hgGatewa
Page 399 and 400:
392 PORTEOUS ET AL.REFERENCESAshers
Page 401 and 402:
394 PORTEOUS ET AL.Valles V., Van O
Page 403 and 404:
396 GOLDSTEIN, CAVALLERI, AND AHMAD
Page 405 and 406:
Page 407 and 408:
Page 410 and 411:
Genetics of Quantitative Variation
Page 412 and 413:
HUMAN GENE EXPRESSION VARIATION 405
Page 414:
HUMAN GENE EXPRESSION VARIATION 407
Page 417 and 418:
410 CHIBA-FALEK AND NUSSBAUMconcent
Page 419 and 420:
412 CHIBA-FALEK AND NUSSBAUMTable 4
Page 421 and 422:
414 CHIBA-FALEK AND NUSSBAUMclein i
Page 424 and 425:
Genomic Perspective and CancerD. BO
Page 426 and 427:
GENOMIC PERSPECTIVE AND CANCER 419F
Page 428 and 429:
GENOMIC PERSPECTIVE AND CANCER 421F
Page 430 and 431:
GENOMIC PERSPECTIVE AND CANCER 423f
Page 432 and 433:
Chromosome 21 and Down Syndrome: Th
Page 434 and 435:
DOWN SYNDROME AND HUMAN CHROMOSOME
Page 436 and 437:
DOWN SYNDROME AND HUMAN CHROMOSOME
Page 438 and 439:
Harvesting the Genome’s Bounty: I
Page 440 and 441:
INTEGRATIVE GENOMICS 433with high-d
Page 442 and 443:
INTEGRATIVE GENOMICS 435497 baits3,
Page 444 and 445:
INTEGRATIVE GENOMICS 437In contrast
Page 446 and 447:
INTEGRATIVE GENOMICS 439Fly19,912Ye
Page 448 and 449:
INTEGRATIVE GENOMICS 441IMPLICATION
Page 450:
INTEGRATIVE GENOMICS 443gene intera
Page 453 and 454:
446 STANKIEWICZ ET AL.Table 1. Sele
Page 455 and 456:
448 STANKIEWICZ ET AL.al. 2002; Wal
Page 457 and 458:
450 STANKIEWICZ ET AL.ate DNA rearr
Page 459 and 460:
452 STANKIEWICZ ET AL.Figure 5. Sch
Page 461 and 462:
454 STANKIEWICZ ET AL.Legius E. 200
Page 463 and 464:
456 SAKAKI ET AL.determined. We pai
Page 465 and 466:
458 SAKAKI ET AL.Table 2. Base Subs
Page 467 and 468:
460 SAKAKI ET AL.D.R. 2003. Genomic
Page 469 and 470:
462 LIPOVICH AND KINGtions that cre
Page 471 and 472:
464 LIPOVICH AND KINGto-tail antise
Page 473 and 474:
466 LIPOVICH AND KINGFigure 2. Perl
Page 475 and 476:
468 LIPOVICH AND KINGtions. In inte
Page 477 and 478:
470 LIPOVICH AND KINGOlson M.V. and
Page 479 and 480:
472 WALLACE, RUIZ-PESINI, AND MISHM
Page 481 and 482:
Page 483 and 484:
Page 485 and 486:
Page 487 and 488:
480 CLARK ET AL.Table 1. Derivation
Page 489 and 490:
482 CLARK ET AL.Table 3. Biological
Page 491 and 492:
484 CLARK ET AL.be under adaptive e
Page 494 and 495:
Inferring Human History: Clues from
Page 496 and 497:
Y-CHROMOSOME HAPLOTYPES AND GEOGRAP
Page 498 and 499:
Page 500:
Page 503 and 504:
496 OLSONTable 1. Talks Grouped by
Page 505 and 506:
498 OLSONbacterial lineages prosper
Page 507 and 508:
500 OLSONwill respond to perturbati
Page 509:
502 OLSONIn short, much remained to
show all

The Genom of Homo sapiens.pdf

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?