13.07.2015 Views

The Genom of Homo sapiens.pdf

The Genom of Homo sapiens.pdf

The Genom of Homo sapiens.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

234 ASHBURNER ET AL.cabulary for the description <strong>of</strong> mutations at both sequenceand grosser levels in the context <strong>of</strong> genomic databases.<strong>The</strong> four major nodes <strong>of</strong> the complete Sequence Ontologyallow for the annotation <strong>of</strong> chromosome mutations, theconsequences <strong>of</strong> mutation, objects that can be located (inbase coordinates) on a sequence, and general attributes <strong>of</strong>genes.CONCLUSION<strong>The</strong> GO is not a mere exercise in knowledge representation;rather, its development is driven by a purely practicalneed—the need to provide semantic standards sothat biological data can be more usefully stored andqueried. <strong>The</strong> task is nontrivial. It is to create a languagefor biological research that is both computationallytractable and humanly understandable.<strong>The</strong> technical aspect <strong>of</strong> the development <strong>of</strong> GO and relatedontologies is, however, relatively trivial comparedto the social aspect <strong>of</strong> the problem. It is predicated oncommunity agreement. <strong>The</strong> community <strong>of</strong> developersand researchers must agree to agree. Achieving resolutionrequires a great deal <strong>of</strong> patience, as reaching a commonunderstanding is <strong>of</strong>ten a lengthy process. It is this acceptance,that reaching community consensus is essential,that is the most notable aspect <strong>of</strong> the GO Consortium. Butthis is not itself sufficient; building ontologies is not anend in itself, the ontologies must be implemented, whichrequires their acceptance by the broader community <strong>of</strong>bioinformaticists and biologists. A common computablebiological language is essential in order to communicate,share, and exploit information from the past and present.Without a strong semantic foundation, we will be livingin a tower <strong>of</strong> Babel. With a common language, the communityis connected and will benefit both individuallyfrom the ready availability <strong>of</strong> information and collectivelyby sharing and coordinating the exchange <strong>of</strong> information.Although the challenge is formidable, the benefitsare even greater.ACKNOWLEDGMENTS<strong>The</strong> Gene Ontology Consortium is supported by a grantfrom the National Institutes <strong>of</strong> Health (HG-02273, PIJudy Blake), and a grant from the Medical ResearchCouncil, UK to M.A. (G-9827766). <strong>The</strong> early development<strong>of</strong> GO was supported by donations from AstraZeneca and Incyte <strong>Genom</strong>ics. C.J.M. is supported by theHoward Hughes Medical Institute. We thank our manycolleagues in the GO Consortium, without whom thisproject would have been impossible. We also thank themany users <strong>of</strong> GO for their feedback. Our use <strong>of</strong> descriptionlogic formats has benefited greatly from discussionswith Drs. Robert Stevens and Chris Wroe <strong>of</strong> the University<strong>of</strong> Manchester.REFERENCESAdams M.D., Celniker S.E., Holt R.A., Evans C.A., GocayneJ.D., Amanatides P.G., Scherer S.E., Li P.W., Hoskins R.A.,Galle R.F., George R.A., Lewis S.E., Richards S., AshburnerM., Henderson S.N., Sutton G.G., Wortman J.R., YandellM.D., Zhang Q., Chen L.X., Brandon R.C., Rogers Y.H.,Blazej R.G., Champe M., and Pfeiffer B.D., et al. 2000. <strong>The</strong>genome sequence <strong>of</strong> Drosophila melanogaster. Science 287:2185.Baader F., McGuinness D., Nardi D., and Patel-Schneider P.,Eds. 2003. <strong>The</strong> Description logic handbook. Cambridge UniversityPress, Cambridge, United Kingdom.Bard J. and Winter R. 2001. Ontologies <strong>of</strong> developmentalanatomy: <strong>The</strong>ir current and future roles. Brief. Bioinform. 2:289.Barrell B.G. and Clark B.F.C. 1974. Handbook <strong>of</strong> nucleic acidsequences. Joynson-Bruvvers, Eynsham, United Kingdom.Bennett J.M. and Kendrew J.C. 1952. Computation <strong>of</strong> Fouriersyntheses with a digital electronic calculating machine. ActaCrystallogr. 5: 109.Berriz G.F., White J.V., King O.D., and Roth, F.P. 2003. GoFishfinds genes with combinations <strong>of</strong> Gene Ontology attributes.Bioinformatics 19: 788.Brachman R.J. 1983. What ISA-A is and isn’t: An analysis <strong>of</strong>links in semantic networks. Computer 16: 30.Cr<strong>of</strong>t L.R. 1973. Handbook <strong>of</strong> protein sequences. Joynson-Bruvvers, Eynsham, United Kingdom.Davidson S.B., Overton C., and Buneman P. 1995. Challenges inintegrating biological data sources. J. Comput. Biol. 2: 557.Dayh<strong>of</strong>f M.O., Eck R.V., Chang Y., and Sochard S.R. 1965. Atlas<strong>of</strong> protein sequence and structure. National BiomedicalResearch Foundation, Washington, D.C.Draghici S., Khatri P., Martins R.P., Ostermeier G.C., andKrawetz S.A. 2003. Global pr<strong>of</strong>iling <strong>of</strong> gene expression. <strong>Genom</strong>ics81: 98.Durbin R. and Thierry-Mieg J. 1991-. A C. elegans database.(http://www.faqs.org/faqs/acedb-faq/).Fasman K. 1994. Restructuring the genome data base: A modelfor a federation <strong>of</strong> biological databases. J. Comput. Biol. 1:165.Fellbaum C., Ed. 1998. WordNet. An electronic lexicaldatabase. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Gilks W.R., Audit B., De Angelis D., Tsoka S., and OuzounisC.A. 2002. Modeling the percolation <strong>of</strong> annotation errors in adatabase <strong>of</strong> protein sequences. Bioinformatics 18: 1641.GK (<strong>Genom</strong>e KnowledgeBase). 2003. (http://www.genomeknowledge.org)Hebert P.D.N., Cywinska A., Ball S.L., and deWaard J.R. 2003.Biological identification through DNA barcodes. Proc. Roy.Soc. Lond. B 270: 312.Hill D.P., Blake J.A., Richardson J.E., and Ringwald M. 2002.Extension and integration <strong>of</strong> the gene ontology (GO): CombiningGO vocabularies with external vocabularies. <strong>Genom</strong>eRes. 12: 1982.Hirschman L., Park J.C., Tsujii, J., Wong L., and Wu C.H. 2002.Accomplishments and challenges in literature data mining forbiology. Bioinformatics 18: 1553.Huxley H.E. 1990. An early adventure in crystallographic computing.In Selections and reflections: <strong>The</strong> legacy <strong>of</strong> Sir L.Bragg (ed. J.M. Thomas and D. Phillips), p.133. Science Reviews,Northwood, United Kingdom.Hvidsten T.R., Komorowski J., Sandvik A.K., and Laegreid A.2001. Predicting gene function from gene expressions and ontologies.Pac. Symp. Biocomput. 2001: 299.Jensen L.J., Gupta R., Staerfeldt H.H., and Brunak S. 2003. Prediction<strong>of</strong> human protein function according to Gene Ontologycategories. Bioinformatics 19: 635.Jenssen T.K., Laegreid A., Komorowski J., and Hovig E. 2001.A literature network <strong>of</strong> human genes for high-throughputanalysis <strong>of</strong> gene expression. Nat. Genet. 28: 21.Kay L.E. 2000. Who wrote the book <strong>of</strong> life? A history <strong>of</strong> the geneticcode. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California.Khatri P., Draghici S., Ostermeier G.C., and Krawetz S.A. 2002.Pr<strong>of</strong>iling gene expression using onto-express. <strong>Genom</strong>ics 79:266.King O.D., Foulger R.E., Dwight S.S., White J.V., and Roth F.P.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!