13.07.2015 Views

The Genom of Homo sapiens.pdf

The Genom of Homo sapiens.pdf

The Genom of Homo sapiens.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ANALYSIS OF ADAPTIVE SELECTION FORREGIONAL mtDNA LINEAGESDirect evidence for the regional accumulation <strong>of</strong> adaptivemutations was obtained by the analysis <strong>of</strong> amino acidreplacement mutation frequencies at the Nodes and theTips <strong>of</strong> the mtDNA macro-haplogroups. <strong>The</strong> replacementmutation frequency <strong>of</strong> the Nodes <strong>of</strong> the regional macrohaplogroupsincreased progressively from its lowest levelin African L to intermediate levels for the Eurasian M andN(R) to their highest level for N(nonR). N(nonR) encompassesthe arctic haplogroups A and X (Fig. 6). Thissouth-to-north increase in Nodal replacement mutationsis also reflected in the Node/Tip ratio, which was lowestin African L (0.7), intermediate in Eurasia M and N(R)(0.8), and highest in Northern N(nonR) (0.94) (Fig. 6).Thus, more northern latitudes are associated with moreNodal replacement mutations.<strong>The</strong> excess <strong>of</strong> Nodal mutations in the higher, colder latitudeswas further confirmed by analysis <strong>of</strong> the haplogroupsthat reside in the arctic and subarctic (Fig. 7).Using the African macro-haplogroup L nodal replacementmutation frequency (0.31) as the reference, thenortheastern Siberian–northern Native American haplogroupsA, C, D, and X all had higher nodal values rangmtDNAVARIATION 475<strong>The</strong> average replacement mutation Conservation Index<strong>of</strong> the Global Phylogeny’s Nodes and Tips is considerablylower than the average <strong>of</strong> the pathogenic mutations(Fig. 5).<strong>The</strong> lower average Global Phylogeny Node and TipConservation Indices, relative to the pathogenic mutations,reflect in part the presence <strong>of</strong> the neutral mutationsscattered across the Global Phylogeny. <strong>The</strong>se depress themean Conservation Index <strong>of</strong> the functionally importantreplacement mutations. To distinguish between the adaptiveversus the neutral mutations in the Nodes, we usedtwo standard deviations from the mean (the 95% confidencelimit) <strong>of</strong> the pathogenic mutations as an indicator<strong>of</strong> replacement mutations that might have phenotypicconsequences. Mutations below this limit were presumedto be relatively neutral (Fig. 5). Using these criteria, wefound that 26% <strong>of</strong> the nodal replacement mutations werehighly conserved with an average amino acid conservationindex <strong>of</strong> 33.2 ± 3.6 (85 ± 9%), slightly below the average<strong>of</strong> the pathogenic mutations (Ruiz-Pesini et al.2004). <strong>The</strong> remaining 74% <strong>of</strong> the nodal replacement mutationshad a much lower average Conservation Index <strong>of</strong>9.1 ± 5.8 (23 ± 15%). <strong>The</strong> Conservation Index <strong>of</strong> the Tipswas comparable, 34.4 (CI = 88%) (42%) versus 9.9 (CI =25%) (58%).<strong>The</strong> high Conservation Index <strong>of</strong> amino acid replacementsoccurring at the Tips represents primarily deleteriousmutations in the process <strong>of</strong> being eliminated by purifyingselection (Templeton 1996). <strong>The</strong> highly conservednodal replacement mutations have a Conservation Indexcomparable to that <strong>of</strong> pathogenic mutations, yet they havebeen retained in the human population for tens <strong>of</strong> thousands<strong>of</strong> years in the face <strong>of</strong> purifying selection. Consequently,these mutations could not be deleterious. <strong>The</strong>refore,they must have been advantageous in the newenvironments confronted by our ancestors.Figure 6. Global and regional replacement mutation frequencies at Nodes and Tips <strong>of</strong> the mitochondrial phylogeny. Global encompassesthe entire mtDNA tree. L, M, N(R), and N(nonR) are individual region-specific macro-haplogroups. Replacement mutationfrequencies, listed on the bars in the Nodes (first row) and Tips (second row) are calculated by the ratio <strong>of</strong> nonsynonymous (NS) tosynonymous (S) nucleotide substitutions. <strong>The</strong> ratio <strong>of</strong> the Node and Tip NS/S ratios is shown above the back row <strong>of</strong> bars.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!