13.07.2015 Views

The Genom of Homo sapiens.pdf

The Genom of Homo sapiens.pdf

The Genom of Homo sapiens.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

350 WESTON ET AL.ures prominently in the activity <strong>of</strong> any given repressor oractivator. <strong>The</strong> absence <strong>of</strong> Gal80 alone, for instance, is sufficientfor high-level transcription <strong>of</strong> the GAL genes(Ideker et al. 2001), and this c<strong>of</strong>actor has been shown toblock recruitment <strong>of</strong> SAGA specifically at Gal4-occupiedpromoters (Carrozza et al. 2002). In another example, thetranscription factor Ste12 binds to distinct program-specifictarget genes depending on the developmental condition(i.e., filamentation versus mating). This selectivebinding is dictated by the status <strong>of</strong> Tec1, a binding partnerfor Ste12 during filamentation but not under conditionsthat induce mating (Zeitlinger et al. 2003). Thus, signaltransduction pathways, controlling the status <strong>of</strong> a transcriptionfactor partner, can infer program-specific distribution<strong>of</strong> Ste12 binding (Zeitlinger et al. 2003). In additionto transcription factor partners, c<strong>of</strong>actors, which aretethered to DNA indirectly through DNA-binding proteins,<strong>of</strong>ten serve as adapters to switch transcription on or<strong>of</strong>f, or to facilitate either process. At the GAL1 promoter,for example, the global Cyc8–Tup1 co-repressor has beenshown to convert from a repressor complex to an activatorcomplex upon binding to the novel protein Cti6 (Papamichos-Chronakiset al. 2002). Cti6 recruits SAGA to theGAL1 promoter, in turn recruiting the basal transcriptionmachinery. Whether Cti6 affects other genes outside <strong>of</strong>the galactose pathway is not yet known. If this factor isspecific for the GAL genes, however, it may infer somelevel <strong>of</strong> specificity with respect to repression by theCyc8–Tup1 global repressor. To understand the role <strong>of</strong>factors like Cti6 will require genome-wide binding analysisand protein–protein interaction studies.FUTURE CHALLENGES FORCHARACTERIZING GENE REGULATORYNETWORKSWith ongoing improvements in technologies aimed atstudying gene regulatory networks, we anticipate enormousprogress in the near future toward characterizingthese networks on a global scale. <strong>Genom</strong>e-wide analysishas already been employed on a large scale to identify theDNA targets <strong>of</strong> most transcription factors in yeast. Althoughthese studies, combined with mounting microarraydata for gene expression changes, provide an excellentbasis for studying regulatory networks, a number <strong>of</strong>challenges remain to fully understand gene regulation.For instance, characterizing protein–DNA interactionsunder different conditions will be critical for understandingany given cellular response. This is emphasized bythe condition-specific binding distributions for Ste12(Zeitlinger et al. 2003). Since most transcriptional eventstake place in response to some environmental change,this is critical. In addition, many transcriptional switchesmay be <strong>of</strong> a transient nature, necessitating kinetic studiesthat can capture transient interactions. Similarly, pr<strong>of</strong>ilinggene expression changes, both mRNA and protein,over time will be much more useful for extracting causeand-effectrelationships within gene responses. Despiteall these future challenges, we have clearly demonstratedthe power <strong>of</strong> systems biology over conventional approachesfor characterizing biological systems. Afteryears <strong>of</strong> intense research on the galactose system, a systemsapproach revealed new insights and demonstrated amuch more global effect to what has traditionally beenconsidered a simple system.HALOBACTERIUM SP.Halobacterium sp. is an extreme halophile that thrivesin saturated brine environments such as those associatedwith the Dead Sea and solar salterns. It <strong>of</strong>fers a versatileand easily assayed system for an array <strong>of</strong> well-coordinatedphysiologies that give it an edge for survival in these harshenvironments (DasSarma and Fleischmann 1995; Das-Sarma and Arora 1999; Oren 1999). It has robust DNA repairsystems that can efficiently reverse the damagescaused by a variety <strong>of</strong> mutagens, including UV radiationand cycles <strong>of</strong> desiccation and rehydration (McCreadyand Marcello 2003; N.S. Baliga and J. Diruggeiro, unpubl.).Halobacterium sp. responds to anaerobic conditionswith the synthesis <strong>of</strong> a purple membrane whosemajor component, bacteriorhodopsin, facilitates the conversion<strong>of</strong> light into ATP (energy). <strong>The</strong> completely sequencedgenome <strong>of</strong> Halobacterium sp. has also providedinsights into much <strong>of</strong> its physiological capabilities; however,nearly two-thirds <strong>of</strong> all genes encoded in thehalobacterial genome have no known function (Ng et al.1998, 2000).Halobacterium sp. can adapt to both aerobic and anaerobicenvironments in the presence or the absence <strong>of</strong> lightand, therefore, is an ideal model system for decipheringthe regulatory circuits that coordinate various metabolicpathways in response to frequent changes in oxygen concentrationand light intensity (Fig. 3). In an aerobic environment,Halobacterium sp. flourishes as a chemoheterotrophsurviving on organic remnants <strong>of</strong> deceased lesserhalophiles incapable <strong>of</strong> living in extreme 4.5 M salt concentrations.It produces energy predominantly throughrespiration utilizing oxygen as the terminal electron acceptor(Ng et al. 2000). During the aerobic phase, the regulatorycircuits operate through a two-component signaltransduction system comprising the retinal-bound sensoryrhodopsin II (SRII) and its interacting transducerHtrII. When SRII is activated by blue-green light, it transmitsa signal to HtrII exposing methylation sites on thetransducer and transiently alters autophosphorylation activity<strong>of</strong> a bound histidine kinase (CheA). <strong>The</strong> consequence<strong>of</strong> the resulting phosphorylation–dephosphorylationcascade is the movement <strong>of</strong> the organism away frombright light to distance itself from damaging UV radiation(Perazzona and Spudich 1999; Luecke et al. 2001; Spudichand Luecke 2002).A drop in oxygen tension results in dramatic changes inHalobacterium sp. physiology, including repression <strong>of</strong>the SRII/HtrII complex and induction <strong>of</strong> an opposingSRI/HtrI complex (Fig. 3). SRI, unlike SRII, translatesorange light into an attractant stimulus by communicatingwith the flagellar motor through the transducer HtrI. <strong>The</strong>low oxygen tension also induces synthesis <strong>of</strong> gas vesicles,which are flotation devices that work in conjunctionwith SRI/HtrI to mediate net upward mobility towardsunlight. SRI, upon absorbing orange light, shifts to a

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!