2CHAPTER 01: INTRODUCTIONIntroductionWhat is Farm to School?Farm to school enriches the connection communitieshave with local, healthy food and food producers bychanging food purchasing and educational activitiesat schools and preschools. Farm to school activitiesand policies are unique to location, and can bedefined in a multitude of ways. For the purposes ofthis evaluation framework, the core elements of farmto school activities are:1. Procurement of local and regional food products;2. Gardening, based at schools and preschools; and3. Education, food and farm related.What Does an Evaluation <strong>Framework</strong> Do?First and foremost, an evaluation framework aimsto move our collective work forward by identifyingpractices and policies that have demonstratedbenefits and by recommending areas for additionalexploration. Secondly, an evaluation frameworkgrounded in a strong theoretical basis guides howsites consistently articulate and implement programelements, evaluate efforts and report on outcomes.An evaluation framework is useful not only topractitioners, but also external evaluators, researchers,policymakers and funders, who can make betterdecisions in response to an improved understandingof how and why program activities are operationalizedon the ground.An Evaluation <strong>Framework</strong> for Farm to SchoolContextIn nearly a decade, farm to school has expandedfrom a handful of programs to a full-fledged, thriving,grassroots-led movement in all 50 states, oftensupported and institutionalized by local, state andfederal agencies and policies. The farm to schoolmovement is at a critical turning point, with thepotential for enabling significant transformations inhow students eat and learn about food in the future.As interest in farm to school has grown, a frameworkto continue guiding this practice is needed. Farm toschool has been recognized as a potential strategyto significantly improve or enhance public health andeconomic development outcomes 1–4 . Researchersalso hypothesize and are beginning to documentassociations with positive outcomes in the educationand environmental quality sectors 2,5–7. Farm to schoolactivities have been identified as chronic diseaseprevention strategies 8–12 because of their potentialpositive influences on encouraging healthy eatingbehaviors in children. Farm to school activities andpolicies also have been embedded in efforts toincrease community food security, reduce hungerand develop robust local or regional food systemsthat result in economic benefits for local and regionalfood producers and processors 13–17 . As farm to schoolsites have proliferated from just a handful in the 1990sto more than 40,000 in 20<strong>14</strong>, there is also a betterunderstanding of how farm to school is adaptedin different community conditions and in differentagricultural growing regions 18–23 . Finally, fundersare showing increasing interest in farm to schoolactivities. Farm to school activities are increasinglybeing supported by existing community resources;funding by federal, state and local governments; or bylocal, regional or national private foundations.Why Do We Need an Evaluation <strong>Framework</strong>?To date, however, no evaluation framework exists toguide practice, research and policy development forthe growing field of farm to school. Farm to school isa relatively new approach and hence literature on thetopic is limited, as compared to some other childhoodobesity prevention or food system developmentEVALUATION FOR TRANSFORMATION
CHAPTER 01: INTRODUCTION3approaches. Farm to school efforts over the last decade havefocused on developing and institutionalizing programs, and notso much on research. As a result, baseline data are scarce andexisting research protocols are inconsistent.Several articles and reports discuss the broader context inwhich farm to school exists 16,24–30 . Since the late 1990s, severalreviews of school site-level evaluations 1,2,18 , school-basednutrition programs’ 31–40 economic impacts of local foodpurchasing 3,13,<strong>14</strong>,17,41–44 , and impacts of school garden programshave been published 1,2,38,45,46 . Recent literature on the potentialand real benefits of farm to school is more robust related to thepublic health and nutrition outcomes 6,22,45–54 as compared to theeconomic, educational or environmental outcomes 2–4,7,41,55–57 .Because of the cross-sectoral nature of farm to schoolspanning public health, economic development, education andenvironmental quality, it is difficult for academic programs tofocus their research efforts on this topic in a multidisciplinaryway. To fully understand and realize the potential the modelholds, a cross-sectoral and broad, collaborative approach toevaluation and research is necessary.Farm to school activities at sites differ and draw strength fromeach unique local context. An evaluation framework is neededto provide guidance on how to consistently track and monitorprogram activities, along with local, state and national policiesthat influence farm to school. The field also needs agreed-uponpriority outcomes worthy of consistent measurement, andvalidated instruments to measure those outcomes.Community“A group of people with diversecharacteristics who are linked by social ties,share common perspectives, and engagein joint action in geographical locations orsettings (p. 1929)” 58 .Community Health“A healthy community is one that iscontinually creating and improving thosephysical and social environments andexpanding those community resourceswhich enable people to mutually supporteach other in performing all the functionsof life and in developing to their maximumpotential (p. 24)” 59 .This evaluation framework is a first step in that direction — it hasbeen developed collaboratively, to ensure that it is relevant forall program types and sizes, as well as a broad range of users.For anyone involved in farm to school activities, this frameworkprovides a starting point for using common language on farmto school elements, touch points, measurable outcomes,indicators and tools.Aims and ScopeThe primary aim of the farm to school evaluation framework isto guide future farm to school research and evaluation efforts,while maintaining a view of the full farm to school picture— the core program elements and their linkages, the policyconnections, and the potential cross-sectoral outcomes in fourkey sectors: public health, comunity economic development,education and environmental quality. Beyond the four sectors,the framework is structured around three levels of action:NATIONAL FARM TO SCHOOL NETWORK
- Page 1 and 2: CHAPTER #: NAME OF CHAPTERIEvaluati
- Page 3 and 4: IIITable of ContentsVVI010717252835
- Page 5 and 6: VForewordDespite the investments ma
- Page 7 and 8: VIILyn Kathlene®°Megan Kemple®°
- Page 9: 101IntroductionImage created by att
- Page 13: CHAPTER 01: INTRODUCTION5Policy-Lev
- Page 16 and 17: 8CHAPTER 02: BACKGROUNDThe Evolutio
- Page 18 and 19: 10CHAPTER 02: BACKGROUNDFigure 1Edu
- Page 20 and 21: 12CHAPTER 02: BACKGROUNDFigure 2Fig
- Page 22 and 23: 14CHAPTER 02: BACKGROUNDFigure 4: T
- Page 25 and 26: CHAPTER 03: FRAMEWORK DEVELOPMENT P
- Page 27 and 28: CHAPTER 03: FRAMEWORK DEVELOPMENT P
- Page 29 and 30: CHAPTER 03: FRAMEWORK DEVELOPMENT P
- Page 31 and 32: CHAPTER 03: FRAMEWORK DEVELOPMENT P
- Page 34 and 35: 26 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 36 and 37: 28 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 38 and 39: 30 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 40 and 41: 32 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 42 and 43: 34 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 44 and 45: 36 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 46 and 47: 38 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 48 and 49: 40 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 50 and 51: 42 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 54 and 55: 46 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 57 and 58: CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, INDI
- Page 59 and 60: CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, INDI
- Page 61:
CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, INDI
- Page 65 and 66:
CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, INDI
- Page 68 and 69:
60 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 70 and 71:
62 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 72 and 73:
64 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 74 and 75:
66 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 76 and 77:
68 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 78 and 79:
70 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 80 and 81:
72 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 82 and 83:
74 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 84 and 85:
76 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 86 and 87:
78 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 88 and 89:
80 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 90 and 91:
82 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 93 and 94:
CHAPTER 05: CONCLUSION AND NEXT STE
- Page 95 and 96:
CHAPTER 05: CONCLUSION AND NEXT STE
- Page 97 and 98:
CHAPTER 05: CONCLUSION AND NEXT STE
- Page 99 and 100:
CHAPTER 05: CONCLUSION AND NEXT STE
- Page 101 and 102:
CHAPTER 05: CONCLUSION AND NEXT STE
- Page 103 and 104:
CHAPTER 05: CONCLUSION AND NEXT STE
- Page 105 and 106:
CHAPTER 05: CONCLUSION AND NEXT STE
- Page 107 and 108:
CHAPTER 05: CONCLUSION AND NEXT STE
- Page 109 and 110:
CHAPTER 05: CONCLUSION AND NEXT STE
- Page 111 and 112:
CHAPTER 05: CONCLUSION AND NEXT STE
- Page 113 and 114:
105ReferencesChapter 11. Joshi, A.,
- Page 115 and 116:
10746. Langellotto, G.A., Gupta, A.
- Page 117 and 118:
10918. Schneider, L., Chriqui, J.,
- Page 119 and 120:
11112. Mary, P.D.S., Karen, M., Kap
- Page 121 and 122:
11360. Zarling, P. When farm-to-sch
- Page 123 and 124:
115103. Story, M., Neumark-Sztainer
- Page 125 and 126:
11736. Eisner, R., Foster, S., Hans
- Page 127 and 128:
11910. Fusco, D. Creating relevant
- Page 129 and 130:
12158. Vermont Law School, Center f
- Page 131 and 132:
12352. Physicians for Social Respon
- Page 133 and 134:
12506Appendices
- Page 135 and 136:
APPENDICES127Appendix 1Evaluation R
- Page 137 and 138:
APPENDICES129• Evaluation Plannin
- Page 139 and 140:
APPENDICES131Appendix 2Farm to Scho
- Page 141 and 142:
APPENDICES133procurement and a guid
- Page 143 and 144:
APPENDICES135Farm to School Core El
- Page 145 and 146:
APPENDICES137Appendix 3 References1
- Page 147 and 148:
APPENDICES139Appendix 5Sample Evalu
- Page 149 and 150:
APPENDICES141• Healthy Eating, Ac
- Page 151 and 152:
APPENDICES143Appendix 6Ideas for Fu
- Page 153:
APPENDICES145• Amount of acres se