12226. Cummins, S.K., Jackson, R.J. The built environmentand children’s health. Pediatr Clin North Am.2001;48(5):1241–52.27. Nowak, A.J., Kolouch, G., Schneyer, L., Roberts, K.H.Building food literacy and positive relationships withhealthy food in children through school gardens. ChildObes. 2012;8(4):392–5.28. Nowak, D.J., Dwyer, J.F. Understanding the Benefits andCosts of Urban Forest Ecosystems. In: Kuser JE, editor.Urban and Commuity Forestry in the Northeast. 2nd ed.Springer; 2007.29. Byrne, J., Wolch, J. Nature, race, and parks: Pastresearch and future directions for geographic research.Prog Hum Geogr. 2009;33(6):743–65.30. Strife, S., Downey, L. Childhood development andaccess to nature: A new direction for environmentalinequality research. Organ Environ. 2009;22(1):99–122.31. Faber Taylor, A., Kuo, F.E., Sullivan, W.C. Coping withADD: The surprising connection to green play settings.Environ Behav. 2001;33(1):54–77.32. Faber Taylor, A., Kuo, F.E. Children with AttentionDeficits Concentrate Better After Walk in the Park. JAtten Disord. 2009;12(5):402–9.33. Kuo, F.E., Faber Taylor, A. A potential natural treatmentfor Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder:Evidence from a national study. Am J Public Health.2004;94(9):1580–6.34. Kahn, P.H., Kellert, S.R., editors. Children and nature:Psychological, sociocultural, and evolutionaryinvestigations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2002.35. Bradley, L.K. Tierra Buena: The creation of an urbanwildlife habitat in an elementary school in the inner city.Child Environ. 1995;12(2):245–9.36. Barrs, R., Lees, E.E., Philippe, D. School GroundGreening: A Policy and Planning Guidebook. Canada:Evergreen; 2002. 19-29, 38-43 p.37. Wakefield, S., Yeudall, F., Taron, C., Reynolds, J., Skinner,A. Growing urban health: Community gardening inSouth-East Toronto. Health Promot Int. 2007;22(2):92–101.38. Vallianatos, M., Gottlieb, R., Haase, M. Farm-to-School:Strategies for Urban Health, Combating Sprawl, andEstablishing a Community Food Systems Approach. JPlan Educ Res. 2004;23:4<strong>14</strong>–23.39. Lawson, L., McNally, M. Putting teens at the center:Maximizing public utility of urban space throughinvolvement in planning and employment. ChildEnviron. 1995;12(2):209–21.40. Alexander, J., North, M.W., Hendren, D.K. Mastergardener classroom garden project: An evaluation ofthe benefits to children. Child Environ. 1995;12(2):<strong>25</strong>6–63.41. Blair, D. The Child in the Garden: An Evaluative reviewof the Benefits of School Gardens. J Environ Educ.2009;40(2):15–38.42. Thorp, L.G. The Pull of the Earth: An EthnographicStudy of an Elementary School Garden [PhD]. TexasA&M University; 2001.43. Horrigan, L., Lawrence, R.S., Walker, P. How sustainableagriculture can address the environmental and humanhealth harms of industrial agriculture. Environ HealthPerspect. 2002;110(5).44. Earles, R., Williams, P. Sustainable Agriculture: AnIntroduction IP043 [Internet]. National SustainableAgriculture Information Service; 2005. Available from:http://attra.ncat.org/attra-pub/sustagintro.html45. Sivakumar, M.V.K., Stefanski, R.. Climate changemitigation, adaptation and sustainability in agriculture.World Meteorological Organization.46. Fultz, L.M., Moore-Kucera, J., Zobeck, T.M., Acosta-Martinez, V., Allen, V.G. Aggregate carbon pools after18 years of integrated crop-livestock management insemiarid soils. Soil Sci Soc Am. 2013;77(5):1659–66.47. Purchasing Guidelines That Minimize the Use ofAntibiotics in Poultry Production: Recommendationsfor Schools and Other Institutional Food Service Buyers[Internet]. School food FOCUS; 2011. Available from:www.schoolfoodFOCUS.org.48. Kids Cook Farm-Fresh Food: Seasonal Recipes,Activities and Farm Profiles that Teach EcologicalResponsibility. Sacramento, CA: California Departmentof Education; 2002.49. Izumi, B.T., Alaimo, K., Hamm, M.W. Farm-to-SchoolPrograms: Perspectives of School Food ServiceProfessionals. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2010;42(2):83–91.50. Ferguson, R.S., Lovell, S.T. Permaculture foragroecology: design, movement, practice,and worldview. A review. Agron Sustain Dev.20<strong>14</strong>;34(2):<strong>25</strong>1–74.51. Food and Food Purchasing A Role for Health Care.Arlington, VA: Health Care Without Harm;EVALUATION FOR TRANSFORMATION
12352. Physicians for Social Responsibility [Internet]. TheHealthy Food in Health Care Initiative. [cited 20<strong>14</strong>Mar 10]. Available from: http://www.psr.org/chapters/washington/enviro-health/healthy-food-initiative.html.53. Heller, M.C., Keoleian, G.A. Life Cycle-BasedSustainability Indicators for Assessment of the U.S. FoodSystem. Ann Arbor, MI: Center for Sustainable SystemsUniversity of Michigan; 2000. Report No.: CSS00-04.54. Food Wastage Footprint: Impacts on Natural ResourcesSummary Report [Internet]. Food and AgricultureOrganization of the United Nations; 2013. Availablefrom: http://www.fao.org/docrep/018/i3347e/i3347e.pdf.55. Sustainability Assessment of Food and AgricultureSystems Guidelines, Indicators and Tool [Internet]. [cited20<strong>14</strong> Jun 16]. Available from: http://www.fao.org/nr/sustainability/sustainability-assessments-safa/en/.56. Adams, M.A., Pelletier, R.L., Zive, M.M., Sallis, J.F. Saladbars and fruit and vegetable consumption in elementaryschools: A plate waste study. J Am Diet Assoc.2005;105(11):1789–92.57. Pirog, R., Van Pelt, T., Enshayan, K., Cook, E. Food, Fuel,and Freeways: An Iowa perspective on how far foodtravels, fuel usage, and greenhouse gas emissions.Ames, Iowa: Leopold Center, Iowa State UniversityExtension and Outreach; 2001.58. Mariola, M.J. The local industrial complex? Questioningthe link between local foods and energy use. Agric HumValues. 20<strong>08</strong>;<strong>25</strong>:193–6.59. Weber, C.L., Matthews, H.S. Food-miles and the relativeclimate impacts of food choices in the United States.Environ Sci Technol. 20<strong>08</strong> May 1;42(10):35<strong>08</strong>–13.60. Edwards-Jones, G., Mila’i Canals, L., Hounsome, N.,Truninger, M., Koerber, G., Hounsome, B., et al. Testingthe assertion that “local food is best”: The challenges ofan evidence-based approach. Trends Food Sci Technol.20<strong>08</strong> May;19(5):265–74.61. Coley, D., Howard, M., Winter, M. Local food, food milesand carbon emissions: A comparison of farm shopand mass distribution approaches. Food Policy. 2009Apr;34(2):150–5.62. Martinez, S., Hand, M., Da Pra, M., Pollack, S., Ralston, K.,Smith, T., et al. Local Food Systems: Concepts, Impacts,and Issues. United States Department of AgricultureEconomic Research Service; 2010. Report No.: 97.63. Smith, P., Martino, D., Cai, Z., Gwary, D., Janzen,H., Kumar, P., et al. Greenhouse gas mitigation inagriculture. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. 20<strong>08</strong> Feb27;363(<strong>14</strong>92):789 –813.64. Tilman, D., Cassman, K.G., Matson, P.A., Naylor,R., Polasky, S. Agricultural sustainability andintensive production practices. Nature. 2002print;418(6898):671–7.65. Vermeulen, S.J., Campbell, B.M., Ingram, J.S. Climatechange and food systems. Annu Rev Environ Resour.2012;37:195–222.66. De Vries, M., de Boer, I.J.M. Comparing environmentalimpacts for livestock products: A review of life cycleassessments. Livest Sci. 2010 Mar;128(1-3):1–11.67. Roy, P., Nei, D., Orikasa, T., Xu, Q., Okadome, H.,Nakamura, N., et al. A review of life cycle assessment(LCA) on some food products. J Food Eng.2009;90(1):1–10.68. Heller, M.C., Keoleian, G.A., Willett, W.C. Towarda life-cycle based, diet-level framework for foodenvironmental impact and nutritional qualityassessment: A critical review. Environ Sci Technol.2013;47:12632–47.69. Heller, M.C., Keoleian, G.A. Greenhouse gas emissionestimates of U.S. dietary choices and food loss. J IndEcol. 20<strong>14</strong> accepted, in press.70. Dietary Guidelines for Americans 2010 [Internet]. U.S.Department of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Healthand Human Services; 2011. Available from: www.dietaryguidelines.gov.71. Wiedman, T., Barrett, J. A review of the EcologicalFootprint indicator - perceptions and methods.Sustainability. 2010;2:1645–93.72. Walls, M., McConnell, V. Transfer of DevelopmentRights in U.S. Communities: Evaluating Program Design,Implementation, and Outcomes. Washington, D.C.:Resources for the Future; 2007.73. Feenstra, G., Ohmart, J. Davis Joint Unified SchoolDistrict’s Efforts to Increase Farm Fresh Food in SchoolMeals Evaluation of Measure Q School Year 2009-2010 Report. UC Sustainable Agriculture Research andEducation Program; 2010 Oct.74. Brillinger, R., Ohmart, J., Feenstra, G. The Crunch LunchManual: A case study of the Davis Joint Unified SchoolDistrict Farmers Market Salad Bar Pilot Program anda fiscal analysis model. UC Sustainable AgricultureResearch and Education Program; 2003.75. Alanis, A.J. Resistance to antibiotics: Are we in the postantibioticera? Arch Med Res. 2005;36(6):697–705.76. Marshall, B.M., Levy, S.B. Food animals andantimicrobials: Impacts on human health. Clin MicrobiolRev. 2011;24(4):718–33.NATIONAL FARM TO SCHOOL NETWORK
- Page 1 and 2:
CHAPTER #: NAME OF CHAPTERIEvaluati
- Page 3 and 4:
IIITable of ContentsVVI010717252835
- Page 5 and 6:
VForewordDespite the investments ma
- Page 7 and 8:
VIILyn Kathlene®°Megan Kemple®°
- Page 9 and 10:
101IntroductionImage created by att
- Page 11 and 12:
CHAPTER 01: INTRODUCTION3approaches
- Page 13:
CHAPTER 01: INTRODUCTION5Policy-Lev
- Page 16 and 17:
8CHAPTER 02: BACKGROUNDThe Evolutio
- Page 18 and 19:
10CHAPTER 02: BACKGROUNDFigure 1Edu
- Page 20 and 21:
12CHAPTER 02: BACKGROUNDFigure 2Fig
- Page 22 and 23:
14CHAPTER 02: BACKGROUNDFigure 4: T
- Page 25 and 26:
CHAPTER 03: FRAMEWORK DEVELOPMENT P
- Page 27 and 28:
CHAPTER 03: FRAMEWORK DEVELOPMENT P
- Page 29 and 30:
CHAPTER 03: FRAMEWORK DEVELOPMENT P
- Page 31 and 32:
CHAPTER 03: FRAMEWORK DEVELOPMENT P
- Page 34 and 35:
26 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 36 and 37:
28 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 38 and 39:
30 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 40 and 41:
32 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 42 and 43:
34 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 44 and 45:
36 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 46 and 47:
38 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 48 and 49:
40 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 50 and 51:
42 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 54 and 55:
46 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 57 and 58:
CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, INDI
- Page 59 and 60:
CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, INDI
- Page 61:
CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, INDI
- Page 65 and 66:
CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, INDI
- Page 68 and 69:
60 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 70 and 71:
62 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 72 and 73:
64 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 74 and 75:
66 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 76 and 77:
68 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 78 and 79:
70 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 80 and 81: 72 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 82 and 83: 74 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 84 and 85: 76 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 86 and 87: 78 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 88 and 89: 80 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 90 and 91: 82 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 93 and 94: CHAPTER 05: CONCLUSION AND NEXT STE
- Page 95 and 96: CHAPTER 05: CONCLUSION AND NEXT STE
- Page 97 and 98: CHAPTER 05: CONCLUSION AND NEXT STE
- Page 99 and 100: CHAPTER 05: CONCLUSION AND NEXT STE
- Page 101 and 102: CHAPTER 05: CONCLUSION AND NEXT STE
- Page 103 and 104: CHAPTER 05: CONCLUSION AND NEXT STE
- Page 105 and 106: CHAPTER 05: CONCLUSION AND NEXT STE
- Page 107 and 108: CHAPTER 05: CONCLUSION AND NEXT STE
- Page 109 and 110: CHAPTER 05: CONCLUSION AND NEXT STE
- Page 111 and 112: CHAPTER 05: CONCLUSION AND NEXT STE
- Page 113 and 114: 105ReferencesChapter 11. Joshi, A.,
- Page 115 and 116: 10746. Langellotto, G.A., Gupta, A.
- Page 117 and 118: 10918. Schneider, L., Chriqui, J.,
- Page 119 and 120: 11112. Mary, P.D.S., Karen, M., Kap
- Page 121 and 122: 11360. Zarling, P. When farm-to-sch
- Page 123 and 124: 115103. Story, M., Neumark-Sztainer
- Page 125 and 126: 11736. Eisner, R., Foster, S., Hans
- Page 127 and 128: 11910. Fusco, D. Creating relevant
- Page 129: 12158. Vermont Law School, Center f
- Page 133 and 134: 12506Appendices
- Page 135 and 136: APPENDICES127Appendix 1Evaluation R
- Page 137 and 138: APPENDICES129• Evaluation Plannin
- Page 139 and 140: APPENDICES131Appendix 2Farm to Scho
- Page 141 and 142: APPENDICES133procurement and a guid
- Page 143 and 144: APPENDICES135Farm to School Core El
- Page 145 and 146: APPENDICES137Appendix 3 References1
- Page 147 and 148: APPENDICES139Appendix 5Sample Evalu
- Page 149 and 150: APPENDICES141• Healthy Eating, Ac
- Page 151 and 152: APPENDICES143Appendix 6Ideas for Fu
- Page 153: APPENDICES145• Amount of acres se