68 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, INDICATORS AND MEASURESThe rationale and limitations of selected indicators,outcomes and measures at the research level areoutlined below:• Indicator 1 and related outcomes and measures:Eating breakfast has long been associated withimproved ability for students to concentrate inclass 49–57 . Because student nutrition is one aspectof a child’s readiness to learn, an exploration offarm to school activities’ influence on participationin school breakfast programs is suggested. Existingliterature on farm to school has not yet examinedthe inclusion of activities during breakfast, or theirability to influence breakfast participation. This maybe worth examining further. It could prove mostuseful in determining the educational outcomesfor farm to school activities in children fromvulnerable families who may participate in schoolbreakfast on a regular basis. It should be notedthat this measure is limited by the fact that studentparticipation in any meal program is influencedby factors beyond the influence of farm to schoolactivities.• Indicator 2 and related outcomes and measures:Student engagement and active participation inactivities is an important indicator for academicsuccess. After building on the evidence for thisindicator, further research can be explored onrelated longer-term outcomes such as averagedaily attendance and chronic absenteeism. Farmto school “activity days” are a first step schoolsor early child learning settings can with farm toschool activities to establish success before theybecome more commonplace.• Indicator 3 and related outcomes and measures:Mindset is argued as a basis for the developmentof different learning strategies, supportingtenacity with challenging tasks, and is reinforcedor impeded by academic performance <strong>14</strong> . This isrelated to social and emotional learning that needsto be studied further in relation to farm to schoolactivities.• Indicator 4 and related outcomes and measures:Course grades predict future college successbetter than standardized achievement tests <strong>14</strong> .Academic mindset, engagement and learningbehaviors are precursors to general achievement,and thus research is needed to better understandwhich farm to school activities, or combinationof activities, influence student academicperformance.Research Outcome: Increase food literacy instudents and staffBuilding on efforts at the program level, this outcomeencourages external evaluators and researchers todetermine how farm to school activity affects studentand adult knowledge and skill attainment related togrowing, preparing, cooking and eating healthy, localfoods.• Indicator 5 and related measures 5.1-5.5: Representa spectrum of ways to measure food literacythrough knowledge and skills. Programs focusedon staff professional development, in addition tostudent learning, can apply these measures to bothstudents and adults. Changes in student or adultknowledge can be assessed through pre- andpost-testing in the classroom, or as part of existingtests for nutrition, health or science content. Itis suggested that program practitioners limit thenumber of surveys and tests given to students, andhence framework developers recommend thatwherever possible, questions on these topics bealigned with existing survey efforts to minimizethe burden. Data collection on these measuresmay require the services of an external evaluator,with additional financial resources and technicalsupport for sites.• Measure 5.1: Is focused on the basics of wherefood comes from and how it is grown. This contentis in the Next Generation Science Standards 47 andeducators may be able to use existing tests andhomework assignments to determine how wellstudents are learning this information. See exampleattitude survey from Wisconsin.• Measure 5.2: Extends into how food impactshealth. It can encompass nutrition or other aspectsof food.EVALUATION FOR TRANSFORMATION
CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, INDICATORS AND MEASURES69Table 19Research Outcome: Increase food literacy in students and adultsIndicator : Increase in student and school adult knowledge about food and its impact on healthMeasure 1.1: Knowledge of local foods, where food comes from and how it is grownMeasure 1.2: Knowledge of food impact on healthMeasure 1.3: Knowledge of at least one element of food heritage, such as foods unique to different cultures, andincluding food histories native to the region/community/their own familyMeasure 1.4: Increased awareness and knowledge of food and nutrition issues facing communityMeasure 1.5: Attainment of food-related skills, such as recipe development, food-preparation, gardening and cookingMeasure 1.6: Number of students communicating and promoting information about local foods, where food comesfrom, how it is grown and physical and mental impacts of healthy eating to families and communitymembersMeasure 1.7: Number of leadership development opportunities for students and adults to share and demonstrate theirknowledge of food literacyMeasure 1.8: Knowledge of how purchasing local food affects the local economyMeasure 1.9: Knowledge and understanding of potential for local food procurement to affect systemic changes forsocial and economic equityRecommended program element(s) needed for this outcome: food-based education and/or school gardeningSee Appendix 5 for listing of tools.NATIONAL FARM TO SCHOOL NETWORK
- Page 1 and 2:
CHAPTER #: NAME OF CHAPTERIEvaluati
- Page 3 and 4:
IIITable of ContentsVVI010717252835
- Page 5 and 6:
VForewordDespite the investments ma
- Page 7 and 8:
VIILyn Kathlene®°Megan Kemple®°
- Page 9 and 10:
101IntroductionImage created by att
- Page 11 and 12:
CHAPTER 01: INTRODUCTION3approaches
- Page 13:
CHAPTER 01: INTRODUCTION5Policy-Lev
- Page 16 and 17:
8CHAPTER 02: BACKGROUNDThe Evolutio
- Page 18 and 19:
10CHAPTER 02: BACKGROUNDFigure 1Edu
- Page 20 and 21:
12CHAPTER 02: BACKGROUNDFigure 2Fig
- Page 22 and 23:
14CHAPTER 02: BACKGROUNDFigure 4: T
- Page 25 and 26: CHAPTER 03: FRAMEWORK DEVELOPMENT P
- Page 27 and 28: CHAPTER 03: FRAMEWORK DEVELOPMENT P
- Page 29 and 30: CHAPTER 03: FRAMEWORK DEVELOPMENT P
- Page 31 and 32: CHAPTER 03: FRAMEWORK DEVELOPMENT P
- Page 34 and 35: 26 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 36 and 37: 28 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 38 and 39: 30 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 40 and 41: 32 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 42 and 43: 34 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 44 and 45: 36 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 46 and 47: 38 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 48 and 49: 40 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 50 and 51: 42 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 54 and 55: 46 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 57 and 58: CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, INDI
- Page 59 and 60: CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, INDI
- Page 61: CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, INDI
- Page 65 and 66: CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, INDI
- Page 68 and 69: 60 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 70 and 71: 62 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 72 and 73: 64 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 74 and 75: 66 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 78 and 79: 70 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 80 and 81: 72 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 82 and 83: 74 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 84 and 85: 76 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 86 and 87: 78 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 88 and 89: 80 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 90 and 91: 82 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 93 and 94: CHAPTER 05: CONCLUSION AND NEXT STE
- Page 95 and 96: CHAPTER 05: CONCLUSION AND NEXT STE
- Page 97 and 98: CHAPTER 05: CONCLUSION AND NEXT STE
- Page 99 and 100: CHAPTER 05: CONCLUSION AND NEXT STE
- Page 101 and 102: CHAPTER 05: CONCLUSION AND NEXT STE
- Page 103 and 104: CHAPTER 05: CONCLUSION AND NEXT STE
- Page 105 and 106: CHAPTER 05: CONCLUSION AND NEXT STE
- Page 107 and 108: CHAPTER 05: CONCLUSION AND NEXT STE
- Page 109 and 110: CHAPTER 05: CONCLUSION AND NEXT STE
- Page 111 and 112: CHAPTER 05: CONCLUSION AND NEXT STE
- Page 113 and 114: 105ReferencesChapter 11. Joshi, A.,
- Page 115 and 116: 10746. Langellotto, G.A., Gupta, A.
- Page 117 and 118: 10918. Schneider, L., Chriqui, J.,
- Page 119 and 120: 11112. Mary, P.D.S., Karen, M., Kap
- Page 121 and 122: 11360. Zarling, P. When farm-to-sch
- Page 123 and 124: 115103. Story, M., Neumark-Sztainer
- Page 125 and 126: 11736. Eisner, R., Foster, S., Hans
- Page 127 and 128:
11910. Fusco, D. Creating relevant
- Page 129 and 130:
12158. Vermont Law School, Center f
- Page 131 and 132:
12352. Physicians for Social Respon
- Page 133 and 134:
12506Appendices
- Page 135 and 136:
APPENDICES127Appendix 1Evaluation R
- Page 137 and 138:
APPENDICES129• Evaluation Plannin
- Page 139 and 140:
APPENDICES131Appendix 2Farm to Scho
- Page 141 and 142:
APPENDICES133procurement and a guid
- Page 143 and 144:
APPENDICES135Farm to School Core El
- Page 145 and 146:
APPENDICES137Appendix 3 References1
- Page 147 and 148:
APPENDICES139Appendix 5Sample Evalu
- Page 149 and 150:
APPENDICES141• Healthy Eating, Ac
- Page 151 and 152:
APPENDICES143Appendix 6Ideas for Fu
- Page 153:
APPENDICES145• Amount of acres se