8CHAPTER 02: BACKGROUNDThe Evolution of Farm to School 1Efforts to connect products grown on local andregional farms with school lunches have existedfor decades, albeit happening informally andindependently through the early 1970s. Schoolfoodservice directors would purchase a crate ortwo of oranges or apples, peaches or plums fromnearby farms when in season. However, as laborcosts escalated and processed produce and entreesbecame more available, many of these practicesbegan to disappear 1 . By the 1980s and 1990s,especially among larger school districts, theseconnections with farmers were almost nonexistent.The farm crisis of the 1980s, which crippled sales formany small- and mid-scale growers, coupled witha growing recognition of obesity among youngerand younger children, created a set of conditionsthat were ripe for reinvigorating the farm to schoolconnection 1 . In the late 1990s, school foodservicedirectors across the country began to buy, tentativelyat first, produce directly from local growers.Motivations were twofold: to introduce healthy, fresh,seasonal produce to children in school lunches andto support struggling regional farmers. In many ofthese schools, children were also exposed to thesoil-to-table cycle through working in their schoolgardens, and cooking and nutrition education in theirclassrooms 1 .These pioneering programs immediatelybecame popular and began to spread fromcommunity to community. Almost 20 years later,farm to school programs have flourished and evolvedinto programs as diverse and vibrant as the schooldistricts and communities that support them.Today, farm to school is being implementednationally, operational in 44 percent of schoolsacross the country; that’s a total of 40,328 schoolsand more than 21 million children in all 50 states 2 .Local, state and national policies have been passed tosupport farm to school, creating basic infrastructure,and establishing publicly funded grant programs.More recently, organizations involved in farm toschool have been exploring the expansion of similarconcepts to the preschool or early care arena, servingthe 0-5 years age group. Farm to preschool is arapidly growing area of interest, and a 2012 snapshotsurvey of farm to preschool activities reports 500sites across the country 3 . In 20<strong>14</strong>, farm to schoolis part of the broader farm to table movementwhere organizations such as hospitals, colleges andrestaurants work more closely with local producersto bring “local food” to consumers. Producers,processors and distributors who sell products thatmeet school foodservice requirements can moreeasily tap into other institutional markets such ashospitals, restaurants, colleges, juvenile detentioncenters and correctional facilities, thereby increasingtheir income potential.Although the concepts behind farm to schoolprograms are sound and the idea has grown inpopularity from coast to coast, the implementationhas not always been easy or consistent. Local, stateand national food and farm policies, as well as theeconomics of school food, driven in part by the foodindustry, has made local procurement difficult formany school districts. One of the key lessons thathas emerged from the evolution of farm to schoolprograms is that to make these programs successful,support is needed from multiple sectors within theschool community (parents, teachers, administrators)and outside it, including distributors, economicdevelopers, health advocates and practitioners,policymakers, farmers and farm agencies, banks,media, community arts and others. Partnershipsare the cornerstone of successful farm to schoolimplementation.Another key lesson is the important connection thatschool food needs to forge with community foodsystems, particularly those systems that are strivingto build regional food system infrastructures anddistribution systems that will not only help schooldistricts procure more local, healthy food, butcontribute to building sustainable food procurementfor the entire community as well.Finally, as the benefits of farm to school becomemore visible, the more advocates can focus on someof the more difficult social justice issues that farm toschool programs allow communities to address 1 . Forexample, farm to school programs lift up foodserviceEVALUATION FOR TRANSFORMATION
CHAPTER 02: BACKGROUND9labor by providing opportunities for professionaldevelopment, empowerment through foodserviceemployment and recognize our “lunch ladies” asthe professional chefs that they are. Farm to schoolprograms also allow us to address the challengesfaced in underserved and rural communitieswhere amenities and partnership present in urbansettings may be scarce. On the food production andprocessing end, farm to school provides opportunitiesto small- and medium-sized farmers to engage inthe institutional food market, and has the potentialto bring attention to food justice issues, such as theconditions faced by farm workers and the labor forcein the food processing and packing industries 1 .Defining Farm to SchoolFarm to school activities tend to be place- and sitespecificwith one or more stated goals. Interests fromfunders, support organizations and policy advocatescan often influence how farm to school activitiesare framed and defined for a specific site. As a result,currently there are multiple definitions that describewhat farm to school is, who participates, what they dowhen and where, and how they do it.In the process of drafting this farm to schoolevaluation framework, it became evident that toconsistently describe and measure outcomes relatedto farm to school programs and policies, there needsto be a clearer sense of “what is a farm to schoolactivity?” There is general agreement that farm toschool initiatives: connect schools (K-12) and earlychildhood education settings (subcategorized as farmto preschool) with local food producers; aim to servehealthy and local food; improve student nutrition;provide agriculture, health and nutrition educationopportunities; and support local and regionalfarmers 4 .In this framework, project team members and authorsscanned the most current terms used to describethe “who,” “what,” “where,” “when,” “why” and “how”of farm to school and it revealed that practitionersin different fields use different words to representthe same farm to school activity or goal. Taking intoaccount the variety and scope of definitions andterms gathered through this process, the NationalFarm to School Network recommends the use of thefollowing concepts as a starting point for consistentlyarticulating farm to school activities.Core Elements of Farm to School:Procurement, Gardening and EducationThe three core elements of farm to school activitiesinclude: local food procurement, school gardeningand food-based education as described in Table 1.These core elements serve as a guide for beginningand building a robust farm to school program, andfor exploring how the three elements interrelateto support outcomes in four different sectors –public health, community economic development,education and environmental quality.Due to differences in interest, assets and resourcesavailable to sites, any one of these core elements canserve as the starting point for establishing farm toschool activities. Program sites will develop specificgoals and outcomes that may result from resourcesand activities in the three core elements. Researchindicates that multiple component approaches aremore powerful in encouraging learning and behaviorchanges than any one element alone 8–10 , and this istrue of farm to school. When implemented alone ortogether, the three core elements are what makesfarm to school unique for its potential cross-sectoraloutcomes. Further, each core element catalyzesthe other, enabling greater impact. For example,educational activities such as taste tests, farm tours orfarmer in the classroom sessions conducted a weekprior to when local products are introduced in thecafeteria can build student awareness and interest,and encourage students to choose those localproducts from the cafeteria line. As farm to school ata given site progresses, implementation of one coreelement can also lead to the other, and enable lastingchange in the community.NATIONAL FARM TO SCHOOL NETWORK
- Page 1 and 2: CHAPTER #: NAME OF CHAPTERIEvaluati
- Page 3 and 4: IIITable of ContentsVVI010717252835
- Page 5 and 6: VForewordDespite the investments ma
- Page 7 and 8: VIILyn Kathlene®°Megan Kemple®°
- Page 9 and 10: 101IntroductionImage created by att
- Page 11 and 12: CHAPTER 01: INTRODUCTION3approaches
- Page 13: CHAPTER 01: INTRODUCTION5Policy-Lev
- Page 18 and 19: 10CHAPTER 02: BACKGROUNDFigure 1Edu
- Page 20 and 21: 12CHAPTER 02: BACKGROUNDFigure 2Fig
- Page 22 and 23: 14CHAPTER 02: BACKGROUNDFigure 4: T
- Page 25 and 26: CHAPTER 03: FRAMEWORK DEVELOPMENT P
- Page 27 and 28: CHAPTER 03: FRAMEWORK DEVELOPMENT P
- Page 29 and 30: CHAPTER 03: FRAMEWORK DEVELOPMENT P
- Page 31 and 32: CHAPTER 03: FRAMEWORK DEVELOPMENT P
- Page 34 and 35: 26 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 36 and 37: 28 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 38 and 39: 30 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 40 and 41: 32 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 42 and 43: 34 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 44 and 45: 36 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 46 and 47: 38 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 48 and 49: 40 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 50 and 51: 42 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 54 and 55: 46 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 57 and 58: CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, INDI
- Page 59 and 60: CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, INDI
- Page 61: CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, INDI
- Page 65 and 66: CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, INDI
- Page 68 and 69:
60 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 70 and 71:
62 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 72 and 73:
64 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 74 and 75:
66 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 76 and 77:
68 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 78 and 79:
70 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 80 and 81:
72 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 82 and 83:
74 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 84 and 85:
76 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 86 and 87:
78 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 88 and 89:
80 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 90 and 91:
82 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 93 and 94:
CHAPTER 05: CONCLUSION AND NEXT STE
- Page 95 and 96:
CHAPTER 05: CONCLUSION AND NEXT STE
- Page 97 and 98:
CHAPTER 05: CONCLUSION AND NEXT STE
- Page 99 and 100:
CHAPTER 05: CONCLUSION AND NEXT STE
- Page 101 and 102:
CHAPTER 05: CONCLUSION AND NEXT STE
- Page 103 and 104:
CHAPTER 05: CONCLUSION AND NEXT STE
- Page 105 and 106:
CHAPTER 05: CONCLUSION AND NEXT STE
- Page 107 and 108:
CHAPTER 05: CONCLUSION AND NEXT STE
- Page 109 and 110:
CHAPTER 05: CONCLUSION AND NEXT STE
- Page 111 and 112:
CHAPTER 05: CONCLUSION AND NEXT STE
- Page 113 and 114:
105ReferencesChapter 11. Joshi, A.,
- Page 115 and 116:
10746. Langellotto, G.A., Gupta, A.
- Page 117 and 118:
10918. Schneider, L., Chriqui, J.,
- Page 119 and 120:
11112. Mary, P.D.S., Karen, M., Kap
- Page 121 and 122:
11360. Zarling, P. When farm-to-sch
- Page 123 and 124:
115103. Story, M., Neumark-Sztainer
- Page 125 and 126:
11736. Eisner, R., Foster, S., Hans
- Page 127 and 128:
11910. Fusco, D. Creating relevant
- Page 129 and 130:
12158. Vermont Law School, Center f
- Page 131 and 132:
12352. Physicians for Social Respon
- Page 133 and 134:
12506Appendices
- Page 135 and 136:
APPENDICES127Appendix 1Evaluation R
- Page 137 and 138:
APPENDICES129• Evaluation Plannin
- Page 139 and 140:
APPENDICES131Appendix 2Farm to Scho
- Page 141 and 142:
APPENDICES133procurement and a guid
- Page 143 and 144:
APPENDICES135Farm to School Core El
- Page 145 and 146:
APPENDICES137Appendix 3 References1
- Page 147 and 148:
APPENDICES139Appendix 5Sample Evalu
- Page 149 and 150:
APPENDICES141• Healthy Eating, Ac
- Page 151 and 152:
APPENDICES143Appendix 6Ideas for Fu
- Page 153:
APPENDICES145• Amount of acres se