11236. Abernethy Elementary, Portland Public SchoolsNutrition Services, Injury Free Coalition for Kids,Ecotrust. New on the Menu: District wide Changesto School Food Start in the Kitcehn at Portland’sAbernethy Elementary. Portland, OR: AbernathyElementary, Portland Public Schools Nutrition Services,Injury Free Coalition for Kids and Ecotrust; 2006.37. Center for Food & Justice, UEPI, Occidental College.Riverside Farm to School Demonstration Project:Final Grant Report to the California Endowment. LosAngeles, CA: A Report of the Center for Food & Justice,UEPI, Occidental College; December 2006; 2004.38. Flock, P., Petra, C., Ruddy, V., Peterangelo, J. A SaladBar Featuring Organic Choices: Revitalizing the SchoolLunch Program. Olympia, WA; 2003.39. Christensen, H. Juanamaria Healthy Schools ProjectFinal Evaluation Report. Ventura, CA: Ventura CountySuperintendent’s Office; 2003.40. Gottlieb, R., et al. Evaluation of the Santa MonicaFarmers’ Market Salad Bar Program. Los Angeles, CA:Center for Food & Justice, Occidental College; 2001.41. Schmidt, M.C., Kolodinsky, J., Symans, C. TheBurlington School Food Project, Final Evaluation Report.Burlington, VT: A Report of the Center for Rural Studies;2006.42. Croom, E., et al. Growing Farms, Growing Minds: TheBurlington School Food Project, Year One Evaluation2003-04. Center for Rural Studies; 2004.43. Triant, S.L., Ryan, A. City of Wyoming Parks andRecreation Summer 2005 Programming Evaluation.Wyoming, MI: A Report of Mixed Greens; 2005.44. Phillips, Z., Romero, R., Smith, K., Reddy, R. Farm toPreschool, Strategies for Growing Healthy Children andCommunities. CACFP Roundtable Conference; 2011Oct 18.45. Joshi, A., Azuma, A.M., Feenstra, G. Do Farm-to-School Programs Make a Difference? Findings andFuture Research Needs. J Hunger Environ Nutr.20<strong>08</strong>;3(2/3):229–46.46. Farm to Preschool, Strategies for Growing HealthyChildren and Communities. CACFP RoundtableConference; 2011 Oct 18.47. Evans, A., Ranjit, N., Rutledge, R., Medina, J., Jennings,R., Smiley, A., et al. Exposure to multiple components ofa garden-based intervention for middle school studentsincreases fruit and vegetable consumption. HealthPromot Pract. 2012;13(5):6<strong>08</strong>–16.48. Howerton, M.W., Bell, B.S., Dodd, K.W., Berrigan, D.,Stolzenberg-Solomon, R., Nebelling, L. School-basedNutrition Programs Produced a Moderate Increasein Fruit and Vegetable Consumption: Meta andPooling Analyses from 7 Studies. J Nutr Educ Behav.2007;39(4):186–96.49. Ratcliffe, M.M., Merrigan, K.A., Rogers, B.L., Goldberg,J.P. The effects of school garden experiences onmiddle school-aged students’ knowledge, attitudes,and behaviors associated with vegetable consumption.2011;12(1):36–43.50. LaRowe, T.L., Bontrager Yoder, A.B., Knitter, A.,Meinen, A., Liebhart, J.L., Schoeller, D. WisconsinFarm to School: One year evaluation Report. Madison,WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison: WiscconsinPrevention of Obesity and Diabetes; Department ofFamily and Nutritional Sciences; Wisconsin Departmentof Health Services; 2011.51. Joshi, A., Azuma, A. Bearing Fruit: Farm to SchoolProgram Evaluation Resources and Recommendation.National Farm to School Program; 2009.52. Knai, C., Pomerleau, J., Lock, K., McKee, M. Gettingchildren to eat more fruit and vegetables: A systematicreview. Prev Med. 2006;42(2):85–95.53. Blair, D. The Child in the Garden: An Evaluative reviewof the Benefits of School Gardens. J Environ Educ.2009;40(2):15–38.54. French, S.A., Stables, G. Environmental interventions topromote vegetable and fruit consumption among youthin school settings. Prev Med. 2003;37:593–610.55. French, S.A., Wechsler, H. School-based research andinitiatives: fruit and vegetable environment, policy, andpricing workshop. Prev Med. 2004;39:S101–S107.56. Robinson-O’Brien, R., Story, M., Heim, S. Impact ofgarden-based youth nutrition intervention programs: areview. J Am Dietitic Assoc. 2009 Feb;109(2):273–80.57. Townsend, N., Murphy, S., Moore, L. The more schoolsdo to promote healthy eating, the healthier the dietarychoices by students. J Epidemiol Community Health.2010;65(10):889–95.58. Hermann, J.R., Parker, S.P., Brown, B.J., Siewe, Y.J.,Denney, B.A., Walker, S.J. After-School GardeningImproves Children’s Reported Vegetable Intake andPhysical Activity. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2006;38:201–2.59. Twiss, J., Dickinson, J., Duma, S., Keinman, T., Paulsen,H., Rilveria, L. Community gardens: Lessons learnedfrom California Healthy Cities and Communities. Am JPublic Health. 2003;93(9):<strong>14</strong>35–8.EVALUATION FOR TRANSFORMATION
11360. Zarling, P. When farm-to-school hits home: Organizershope healthier diets reach families. Green Bay PressGazette [Internet]. 20<strong>14</strong> Feb 19 [cited 20<strong>14</strong> Mar 8];Available from: http://www.greenbaypressgazette.com/article/20<strong>14</strong>0218/GPG0101/302180172/When-farmschool-hits-home-Organizers-hope-healthier-dietsreach-families?nclick_check=1.61. Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee. Report of theDietary Guidelines Advisory Committee on the DietaryGuidelines for Americans, 2010, to the Secretary ofAgriculture and the Secretary of Health and HumanServices. Washington, D.C.: Agricultural ResearchService; 2010.62. Dietary Guidelines for Americans 2010 [Internet]. U.S.Department of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Healthand Human Services; 2011. Available from: www.dietaryguidelines.gov63. Reedy, J., Drebs-Smith, S.M. Dietary Sources of Energy,Solid Fats, and Added Sugars among Children andAdolescents in the United States. J Am Diet Assoc.2010;110:<strong>14</strong>77–84.64. Freedman, D.S., Zuguo, M., Srinivasan, S.R., Berenson,G.S., Dietz, W.H. Cardiovascular risk factors and excessadiposity among overweight children and adolescents:the Bogalusa Heart Study. J Pediatr. 2007;150(1):12–7.65. Whitlock, E., Williams, S.B., Gold, R., Smith, P.R.,Shipman, SA. Screening and interventions forchildhood overweight: a summary of evidence forthe US Preventive Services Task Force. Pediatrics.2005;116(1):e1<strong>25</strong>–<strong>14</strong>4.66. Gidding, S.S., Dennison, B.A., Birch, L.L., Daniels,S.R., Gilman, M.W., Lichtenstein, A.H., et al. DietaryRecommendations for Children and Adolescents:A Guide for Practitioners. Am Acad Pediatr.2006;117(2):544–59.67. National Academy of Sciences. School Meals: BuildingBlocks for Healthy Children. Consensus Report by theInstitute of Medicine of the National Academies, Foodand Nutrition Board, Committee on Nutrition Standardsfor National School Lunch and Breakfast Programs,Washington D.C.; 2009.68. Committee on Nutrition Standards for Foods inSchools, Virginia A. Stallings and Ann L. Yaktine, editors.Nutrition Standards for Foods in Schools: Leading theWay Toward Healthier Youth. Washington, D.C.: TheNational Academies Press; 2007. 296 p.69. Slusser, W.M., Cumberland, W.G., Browdy, B.L., Lange,L., Neumann, C. A school salad bar increases frequencyof fruit and vegetable consumption among childrenliving in low-income households. Public Health Nutr.2007;10(12):<strong>14</strong>90–6.70. Taylor, J.C., Johnson, R.K. Farm to School as a strategyto increase children’s fruit and vegetable consumptionin the United States: Research and recommendations.Nutr Bull. 2013;38:70–9.71. Morris, J.L., Neustadter, A., Zidenberg-Cherr, S. Firstgradegardeners more likely to taste vegetables. CalifAgric. 2001;55(1):53–46.72. Ratcliffe, M.M. Garden-based education in schoolsettings: The effects on children’s vegetableconsumption, vegetable preferences and ecoliteracy.Tufts University; 2007.73. Morris, J.L., Zidenberg-Cherr, S. Garden-enhancednutrition curriculum improves fourth-grade schoolchildren’s knowledge of nutrition and preferences forsome vegetables. J Am Dietitic Assoc. 2002;102(1):91–3.74. McAleese, J., Rankin, L.L. Garden-Based NutritionEducation Affects Fruit and Vegetable Consumptionin Sixth-Grade Adolescents. J Am Diet Assoc. 2007Apr;107:662–5.75. Langellotto, G.A., Gupta, A. Gardening increasesvegetable consumption in school-aged children:a meta-analytical synthesis. HortTechnology.2012;22(4):430–45.76. Reinaerts, E., de Nooijer, J., Candel, M., de Vries, N.Increasing children’s fruit and vegetable consumption:distribution or a multicomponent programme? PublicHealth Nutr. 2007 Sep;10(9):939–47.77. Somerset, S., Markwell, K. Impact of a school-basedfood garden on attitudes and identification skillsregarding vegetables and fruit: a 12-month interventiontrial. Public Health Nutr. 2009 Feb;12(2):2<strong>14</strong>–21.78. Parmer, S.M., Salisbury-Glennon, J., Shannon, D.,Struempler, B. School Gardens: An Experiential LearningApproach for a Nutrition Education Program toIncrease Fruit and Vegetable Knowledge, Preference,and Consumption among Second-grade Students. JNutr Educ Behav. 2009;41:212–7.79. Morgan, P.J., Warren, J.M., Lubans, D.R., Saunders,K.L., Quick, G.I., Collins, C.E. The impact of nutritioneducation with and without a school garden onknowledge, vegetable intake and preferences andquality of school life among primary-school students.Public Health Nutr. 2010 May 5;13(11):1931–40.NATIONAL FARM TO SCHOOL NETWORK
- Page 1 and 2:
CHAPTER #: NAME OF CHAPTERIEvaluati
- Page 3 and 4:
IIITable of ContentsVVI010717252835
- Page 5 and 6:
VForewordDespite the investments ma
- Page 7 and 8:
VIILyn Kathlene®°Megan Kemple®°
- Page 9 and 10:
101IntroductionImage created by att
- Page 11 and 12:
CHAPTER 01: INTRODUCTION3approaches
- Page 13:
CHAPTER 01: INTRODUCTION5Policy-Lev
- Page 16 and 17:
8CHAPTER 02: BACKGROUNDThe Evolutio
- Page 18 and 19:
10CHAPTER 02: BACKGROUNDFigure 1Edu
- Page 20 and 21:
12CHAPTER 02: BACKGROUNDFigure 2Fig
- Page 22 and 23:
14CHAPTER 02: BACKGROUNDFigure 4: T
- Page 25 and 26:
CHAPTER 03: FRAMEWORK DEVELOPMENT P
- Page 27 and 28:
CHAPTER 03: FRAMEWORK DEVELOPMENT P
- Page 29 and 30:
CHAPTER 03: FRAMEWORK DEVELOPMENT P
- Page 31 and 32:
CHAPTER 03: FRAMEWORK DEVELOPMENT P
- Page 34 and 35:
26 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 36 and 37:
28 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 38 and 39:
30 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 40 and 41:
32 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 42 and 43:
34 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 44 and 45:
36 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 46 and 47:
38 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 48 and 49:
40 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 50 and 51:
42 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 54 and 55:
46 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 57 and 58:
CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, INDI
- Page 59 and 60:
CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, INDI
- Page 61:
CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, INDI
- Page 65 and 66:
CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, INDI
- Page 68 and 69:
60 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 70 and 71: 62 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 72 and 73: 64 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 74 and 75: 66 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 76 and 77: 68 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 78 and 79: 70 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 80 and 81: 72 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 82 and 83: 74 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 84 and 85: 76 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 86 and 87: 78 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 88 and 89: 80 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 90 and 91: 82 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 93 and 94: CHAPTER 05: CONCLUSION AND NEXT STE
- Page 95 and 96: CHAPTER 05: CONCLUSION AND NEXT STE
- Page 97 and 98: CHAPTER 05: CONCLUSION AND NEXT STE
- Page 99 and 100: CHAPTER 05: CONCLUSION AND NEXT STE
- Page 101 and 102: CHAPTER 05: CONCLUSION AND NEXT STE
- Page 103 and 104: CHAPTER 05: CONCLUSION AND NEXT STE
- Page 105 and 106: CHAPTER 05: CONCLUSION AND NEXT STE
- Page 107 and 108: CHAPTER 05: CONCLUSION AND NEXT STE
- Page 109 and 110: CHAPTER 05: CONCLUSION AND NEXT STE
- Page 111 and 112: CHAPTER 05: CONCLUSION AND NEXT STE
- Page 113 and 114: 105ReferencesChapter 11. Joshi, A.,
- Page 115 and 116: 10746. Langellotto, G.A., Gupta, A.
- Page 117 and 118: 10918. Schneider, L., Chriqui, J.,
- Page 119: 11112. Mary, P.D.S., Karen, M., Kap
- Page 123 and 124: 115103. Story, M., Neumark-Sztainer
- Page 125 and 126: 11736. Eisner, R., Foster, S., Hans
- Page 127 and 128: 11910. Fusco, D. Creating relevant
- Page 129 and 130: 12158. Vermont Law School, Center f
- Page 131 and 132: 12352. Physicians for Social Respon
- Page 133 and 134: 12506Appendices
- Page 135 and 136: APPENDICES127Appendix 1Evaluation R
- Page 137 and 138: APPENDICES129• Evaluation Plannin
- Page 139 and 140: APPENDICES131Appendix 2Farm to Scho
- Page 141 and 142: APPENDICES133procurement and a guid
- Page 143 and 144: APPENDICES135Farm to School Core El
- Page 145 and 146: APPENDICES137Appendix 3 References1
- Page 147 and 148: APPENDICES139Appendix 5Sample Evalu
- Page 149 and 150: APPENDICES141• Healthy Eating, Ac
- Page 151 and 152: APPENDICES143Appendix 6Ideas for Fu
- Page 153: APPENDICES145• Amount of acres se