36 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, INDICATORS AND MEASURESPublic HealthFor the purposes of this framework, “publichealth” is defined as “the combination ofsciences, skills and beliefs that is directed tothe maintenance and improvement of thehealth of all the people through collectiveor social actions. The programs, servicesand institutions involved emphasizethe prevention of disease and [the]promot [ion] [of] good health … of … thepopulation as a whole 13 .” This includes “…policy development and population healthsurveillance <strong>14</strong> .”Sustainable Food SystemA sustainable food system is one thatprovides healthy food to meet currentfood needs, while maintaining healthyecosystems that also can provide foodfor generations to come with minimalnegative impact to the environment. Asustainable food system also encourageslocal production and distributioninfrastructures and makes nutritious foodavailable, accessible and affordable to all.Further, it is humane and just, protectingfarmers and other workers, consumers andcommunities 15 .Health InequityDifferences in health that are not onlyunnecessary and avoidable, but in addition,are considered unfair and unjust 16 .Health EquityEquity in health implies that everyoneshould have a fair opportunity to attaintheir full health potential and thatno one should be disadvantaged fromachieving this potential, regardless fromsocial standing, ability, gender, economicfactors, race, culture or ethnicity. Healthequity is concerned with creating equalopportunities for health and with bringinghealth differences down to the lowestpossible level, often through distribution ofresources so that services and supports areavailable where they are most needed 16 .• Students’ attitudes toward, preferences for, and consumptionof, fruits and vegetables 45,47–58 .• Students’ consumption of less unhealthy foods 45,50,51• Students’ participation in physical activity in gardens 58,59A Public Health Lens for Farm to SchoolWith a public health lens, farm to school activities aim toprovide all preschool and school-age children and their familiesequitable access to healthy, local food and food educationthat empowers them to maintain and improve their health andwell-being. It is important to note that the two words — localand healthy — are not synonymous and are not meant to bein the context of farm to school. The entire spectrum of farmto school activities provides opportunities for local foods thatare healthy (such as fruits and vegetables, whole grains, leanproteins, etc.) to be introduced and incorporated into theschool food environment, along with experiential nutritionand agricultural education activities for children. Schools andearly childhood educators can use farm to school activities tobuild healthy cultural norms about food. This is crucial becausea healthy diet and good nutrition are major factors, along“It’s really important to bring the message that the kidsare learning at school back to the home so they canget it again,” Ashley Ponshok said. “If their parents feelstrongly about the same things their teachers are tellingthem, kids are more likely to develop those lifelongeating habits 60 .”—Ashley Ponshok is with Live 54218, a nonprofit that aims topromote healthier lifestyles in Brown County, Wisconsin, throughfarm to school activities.with physical activity, in preventing chronic diseases such astype 2 diabetes and high blood pressure 61–66 . With the recentupdates to the nutrition standards for school meals, basedin part on recommendations of the Institute of Medicine 67,68 ,schools are serving healthier meal options to children thanthey were before. The addition of local foods to the mix offersunique educational opportunities that support the provision ofhealthier food options. Sensory activities with locally sourcedfoods — such as taste tests before new foods are introducedin the cafeteria, engagement in the school garden, cookingEVALUATION FOR TRANSFORMATION
CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, INDICATORS AND MEASURES37demonstrations and parent education, and creationof culturally relevant recipes — can bolster children’swillingness to try new foods, thereby ensuring thatschool meals are eaten and enjoyed by children.Further, the purchase of local foods by schoolscan support local producers and processors, andin turn bolster individual or family health throughemployment and income generation, as discussedfurther in Chapter 4.3. Farm to school providesopportunities for public health agencies to collaboratewith related agencies such as agriculture, educationand child care licensing. Specifically from a publichealth lens, farm to school activities may:• Respond to rising public health and nutritionconcerns about childhood chronic diseases andobesity by providing opportunities for childrento consume local, healthy food products such asfruits and vegetables 47–49,52,69–79 , whole grains, andlean proteins.• Provide schools opportunities for incorporatingmore fruits and vegetables in school meals, asrequired by the updated nutritional standards forschool meal programs, 2010 19 .• Have the potential to change the school foodenvironment through educational activities thatemphasize healthy eating and the promotion ofhealthy lifestyles 10,12 .• Change a school’s social and physicalenvironments, including the curriculum and how itis taught 10,20,22,80,81 .• Positively reinforce how children learn about, theirattitudes toward, and relationship with healthyfood through health-promoting messages inschools and sent home to parents, hands-onactivities, introduction of new foods at schoolmeals and adult role-modeling 10,57 .• Inform early food preferences, especially for theyoungest children (0–5 years) 44,82,83 .• Can encourage food-production and foodpreparationskill building, self-sufficiency and selfefficacythrough experience in school gardening orcooking classes 32,85–89 .Using food as an educational tool is an avenue forincreasing awareness and familiarity of healthy foodsand local foods. For example, visits to regional farmscan help children understand where and how foodis produced, perhaps creating a personal connectionwith the farmer who grew the tomatoes served inthe cafeteria. This is not possible when foods arepurchased from much farther away. Emerging reportsindicate that farm to school has been effective instrengthening children’s and communities’ knowledgeabout, and attitudes toward, agriculture, food,nutrition and the environment. Key social connectionoutcomes related to farm to school include:• New connections between learning in classroomsand food eaten in cafeterias• Improved school and community relationships 90• New relationships between producers and schooldistricts 91–93 .Promotion of local and healthy foods can contributeto health promoting messages in our social andphysical environments. At the local and state levels,promotional campaigns such as “Buy Fresh Buy Local”reinforce positive messages about local, healthyfoods.Farm to school activities can support public healthoutcomes at multiple levels of the socio-ecologicalmodel. Figure 8 provides examples of what this canlook like using the SEM. Farm to school activitiescan impact physical environments, such as schoolsettings, and social relationships at each level of thismodel because activities can influence institutionaland individual behaviors.• Provide opportunities for family engagement,thereby ensuring that the healthy eating messageis carried into homes 1,45,51,84 .NATIONAL FARM TO SCHOOL NETWORK
- Page 1 and 2: CHAPTER #: NAME OF CHAPTERIEvaluati
- Page 3 and 4: IIITable of ContentsVVI010717252835
- Page 5 and 6: VForewordDespite the investments ma
- Page 7 and 8: VIILyn Kathlene®°Megan Kemple®°
- Page 9 and 10: 101IntroductionImage created by att
- Page 11 and 12: CHAPTER 01: INTRODUCTION3approaches
- Page 13: CHAPTER 01: INTRODUCTION5Policy-Lev
- Page 16 and 17: 8CHAPTER 02: BACKGROUNDThe Evolutio
- Page 18 and 19: 10CHAPTER 02: BACKGROUNDFigure 1Edu
- Page 20 and 21: 12CHAPTER 02: BACKGROUNDFigure 2Fig
- Page 22 and 23: 14CHAPTER 02: BACKGROUNDFigure 4: T
- Page 25 and 26: CHAPTER 03: FRAMEWORK DEVELOPMENT P
- Page 27 and 28: CHAPTER 03: FRAMEWORK DEVELOPMENT P
- Page 29 and 30: CHAPTER 03: FRAMEWORK DEVELOPMENT P
- Page 31 and 32: CHAPTER 03: FRAMEWORK DEVELOPMENT P
- Page 34 and 35: 26 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 36 and 37: 28 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 38 and 39: 30 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 40 and 41: 32 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 42 and 43: 34 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 46 and 47: 38 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 48 and 49: 40 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 50 and 51: 42 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 54 and 55: 46 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 57 and 58: CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, INDI
- Page 59 and 60: CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, INDI
- Page 61: CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, INDI
- Page 65 and 66: CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, INDI
- Page 68 and 69: 60 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 70 and 71: 62 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 72 and 73: 64 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 74 and 75: 66 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 76 and 77: 68 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 78 and 79: 70 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 80 and 81: 72 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 82 and 83: 74 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 84 and 85: 76 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 86 and 87: 78 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 88 and 89: 80 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 90 and 91: 82 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 93 and 94: CHAPTER 05: CONCLUSION AND NEXT STE
- Page 95 and 96:
CHAPTER 05: CONCLUSION AND NEXT STE
- Page 97 and 98:
CHAPTER 05: CONCLUSION AND NEXT STE
- Page 99 and 100:
CHAPTER 05: CONCLUSION AND NEXT STE
- Page 101 and 102:
CHAPTER 05: CONCLUSION AND NEXT STE
- Page 103 and 104:
CHAPTER 05: CONCLUSION AND NEXT STE
- Page 105 and 106:
CHAPTER 05: CONCLUSION AND NEXT STE
- Page 107 and 108:
CHAPTER 05: CONCLUSION AND NEXT STE
- Page 109 and 110:
CHAPTER 05: CONCLUSION AND NEXT STE
- Page 111 and 112:
CHAPTER 05: CONCLUSION AND NEXT STE
- Page 113 and 114:
105ReferencesChapter 11. Joshi, A.,
- Page 115 and 116:
10746. Langellotto, G.A., Gupta, A.
- Page 117 and 118:
10918. Schneider, L., Chriqui, J.,
- Page 119 and 120:
11112. Mary, P.D.S., Karen, M., Kap
- Page 121 and 122:
11360. Zarling, P. When farm-to-sch
- Page 123 and 124:
115103. Story, M., Neumark-Sztainer
- Page 125 and 126:
11736. Eisner, R., Foster, S., Hans
- Page 127 and 128:
11910. Fusco, D. Creating relevant
- Page 129 and 130:
12158. Vermont Law School, Center f
- Page 131 and 132:
12352. Physicians for Social Respon
- Page 133 and 134:
12506Appendices
- Page 135 and 136:
APPENDICES127Appendix 1Evaluation R
- Page 137 and 138:
APPENDICES129• Evaluation Plannin
- Page 139 and 140:
APPENDICES131Appendix 2Farm to Scho
- Page 141 and 142:
APPENDICES133procurement and a guid
- Page 143 and 144:
APPENDICES135Farm to School Core El
- Page 145 and 146:
APPENDICES137Appendix 3 References1
- Page 147 and 148:
APPENDICES139Appendix 5Sample Evalu
- Page 149 and 150:
APPENDICES141• Healthy Eating, Ac
- Page 151 and 152:
APPENDICES143Appendix 6Ideas for Fu
- Page 153:
APPENDICES145• Amount of acres se