11860. Meter, K. Learning how to multiply. J Agric Food SystCommunity Dev. 2010;1(2):9–12.61. Meter, K., Goldenberg, M.P. Making Small Farms into BigBusiness. Crossroads Resource Center; 2013.62. Barham, J., Tropp, D., Enterline, K., Farbman, J., Fisk,J., Kiraly, S. Regional Food Hub Resource Guide.Washington, D.C.: United States Department ofAgriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service; 2012.63. Farmers Markets and Local Food Marketing [Internet].Food Hubs: Building Stronger Infrastructure for Small orMid-Size Producers. 20<strong>14</strong> [cited 20<strong>14</strong> Apr 4]. Availablefrom: http://www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/foodhubs64. Joshi, A., Azuma, A.M., Feenstra, G. Do Farm-to-SchoolPrograms Make a Difference? Findings and FutureResearch Needs. J Hunger Environ Nutr. 20<strong>08</strong>;3.65. Berkenkamp, J. Making the farm-school connection:Opportunities and barriers to greater use of locallygrown produce in public schools. Minneapolis:University of Minnesota, Department of AppliedEconomics; 2006.66. Christie, M. Scaling Up Local Food: Investing in Farm& Food Systems Infrastructure in the Pioneer Valley.Community Invovled in Sustaining Agriculture; 2011.67. Day-Farnsworth, L., McCown, B., Miller, M., Pfeiffer, A.Scaling Up: Meeting the Demand for Local Food. UW-Extension Ag Innovation Center, UW-Madison Centerfor Integrated Agricultural Systems; 2009.68. Berkenkamp, J. Eating Our Peas & Carrots: Strategiesfor Expanding K-12 Access to Fruits and VegetablesThrough Supply Chain Innovation and Investment.School Food FOCUS; 20<strong>14</strong>.69. Vermont Law School, Center for Agriculture and FoodSystems, National Farm to School Network. State Farmto School Legislative Survey: 2002-2013. 20<strong>14</strong> Jan.70. Procurement Geographic Preference Q & A’s - Part II[Internet]. Alexandria, VA: United States Department ofAgriculture, Food and Nutrition Service; 2012. ReportNo.: SP 03-2013, CACFP 02-2013, SFSP 02-2013.Available from: http://www.fns.usda.gov/sites/default/files/SP03-2013os.pdf71. Sobell, S., Pelissier, K., Griffin, K. A Working Historyof Farm to School Legislation in Oregon [Internet].Portland, OR: Ecotrust Farm to School Program andUpstream Public Health; 2013. Available from: http://www.ecotrust.org/farmtoschool/72. Ahern, M., Brown, C., Dukas, S. A national study of theassociation between food environments and countylevelhealth outcomes. J Rural Health. 2011;27(4):267–379.73. Salois, M.J. Obesity and Diabetes, the Built Environment,and the “Local” Food Economy. UK: University ofReading; 2011.Chapter 4.41. Desmond, D., Grieshop, J., Subramaniam, A.Revisiting Garden Based Learning in Basic Education:Philosophical Roots, Historical Foundations, BestPractices and Products, Impacts, Outcomes and FutureDirections. Food and Agriculture Organization. UnitedNations: International Institute for Educational Planning;2004. p. 59.2. Kolb, D.A. Experiential Learning Experience As a Sourceof Learning and Development. New Jersey: PrenticeHall; 1984.3. Kolb, A.Y., Kolb, D.A. The Kolb Learning Style Inventory- Version 3.1 2005 Technical Specifications. ExperienceBased Learning Systems, Inc., Case Western ReserveUniversity; 2005.4. Beckman, L.L., Smith, C. An evaluation of inner-cityyouth garden program participants’ dietary behaviorand garden and nutrition knowledge. J Agric Educ.20<strong>08</strong>;49(4):11–24.5. Skelton, P., Seevers, B., Dormody, T., Hodnett, F. Aconceptual process model for improving youth sciencecomprehension. J Ext. 2012;50(3):<strong>14</strong>.6. Blair, D. The Child in the Garden: An Evaluative reviewof the Benefits of School Gardens. J Environ Educ.2009;40(2):15–38.7. Ozer, E.J. The Effects of School Gardens on Studentsand Schools: Conceptualization and Considerations forMaximizing Healthy Development. Health Educ Behav.2007;34:846–63.8. Vidgen, H., Gallegos, D. Defining food literacy, itscomponents, development and relationship to foodintake: A case study of young people and disadvantage[Internet]. Brisbane, Australia: Queensland Universityof Technology; 2012. Available from: http://eprints.qut.edu.au/53786/1/Food_literacy_and_young_people_report.pdf.9. Klemmer, C.D., Waliczek, T.M., Zajicek, J.M. Growingminds: The effect of a school gardening programon the science achievement of elementary students.HortTechnology. 2005;15(3):448–52.EVALUATION FOR TRANSFORMATION
11910. Fusco, D. Creating relevant science throughurban planning and gardening. J Res Sci Teach.2001;38(8):860–77.11. Sullivan, A.F., Tufts Univ. M. Community Gardening inRural Regions: Enhancing Food Security and Nutrition.[Internet]. 1999 Dec. Available from: http://stats.lib.pdx.edu/proxy.php?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=ED439862&site=ehostlive(requires account login).12. Tagtow, A.M., Richey, E.J.D. Growing Solutions:Cultivating Health and Food Security Through FoodGardening in Iowa. Food Access & Health Work Groupof the Iowa Food Systems Council; 2012.13. ASCD Positions [Internet]. 20<strong>14</strong>. Available from: http://www.ascd.org/news-media/ASCD-Policy-Positions/ASCD-Positions.aspx#wholechild.<strong>14</strong>. Farrington, C,A,, Roderick, M., Allensworth, E.,Nagaoka, J., Keyes, T.S., Johnson, D.W., et al. TeachingAdolescents to Become Learners The Role ofNoncognitive Factors in Shaping School Performance:A Critical Literature Review. Chicago, IL: University ofChicago Consortium on Chicago School Research;2012.15. Joshi, A., Ratcliffe, M.M. Causal pathways linking farmto school to childhood obesity prevention. Child Obes.2012;8(4):305–<strong>14</strong>.16. Ratcliffe, M.M. A sample theory-based logic model toimprove program development, implementation, andsustainability of Farm to School programs. Child Obes.2012;8(4):315–22.17. Lieberman, G.A., Hoody, L. Closing the AchievementGap: Using the Environment as an Integrating Contextfor Learning. San Diego, CA; 1998.18. Ratcliffe, M.M., Merrigan, K.A., Rogers, B.L., Goldberg,J.P. The effects of school garden experiences onmiddle school-aged students’ knowledge, attitudes,and behaviors associated with vegetable consumption.2011;12(1):36–43.19. Ratcliffe, M.M. Garden-based education in schoolsettings: The effects on children’s vegetableconsumption, vegetable preferences and ecoliteracy.Tufts University; 2007.20. Henderson, T., Rader, M., Sorte, B., Ratcliffe, M.M.,Lawrence, A., Lucky, J., et al. Health Impact Assessment:Farm to School and School Garden Policy, HB 2800.Portland, Oregon: Upstream Public Health; 2011.21. DeMarco, L., Relf, D., McDaniel, A. Extension MasterGardeners valued by teachers in school gardeningprograms. J Ext. 1998;36(5):<strong>25</strong>0–5.22. Murphy, J.M. Education for Sustainability: Findingsfrom the Evaluation Study of the Edible Schoolyard.Massachusetts, MA: Massachusetts General Hospital;2003 Apr.23. Smith, L.L., Motsenbocker, C.E. Impact of Hands-onScience through School Gardening in Louisiana PublicElementary Schools. HortTechnology. 2005;15(3):439–43.24. Robison, S., Paxton-Aiken, A., Marques, B., Jackson,E. Farm to school education project: Innovativepartnerhsip to support student achievement of coreknowledge and competencies and provide servicelearningopportunity through farm to school. J AcadNutr Diet. 2013;113(Supplement):pA50–A50.<strong>25</strong>. Subramaniam, A. Garden-based Learning in BasicEducation: A Historical Review. Monograph.2002;Summer.26. Joshi, A., Azuma, A.M. Year One Evaluation Report:Fresh from the Farm Program Implementation atLozano Bilingual and International Center School. LosAngeles, CA: A Report of the Center for Food & Justiceto Seven Generations Ahead; 2006.27. Dirks, A.E., Orvis, K. An Evaluation of the JuniorMaster Gardener Program in Third Grade Classrooms.HortTechnology. 2005;15(3):443–7.28. Waliczek, T.M., Bradley, J.C., Zajicek, J.M. The effect ofschool gardens on children’s interpersonal relationshipsand attitudes toward school. HortTechnology. 2011Sep;11(3):466–8.29. Williamson, R., Smoak, E. Creating a down-to-eartyapproach to teaching science, math and technology. JExt. 1999;37(3).30. Canaris, I. Growing foods for growing minds:Integrating gardening and nutrition education into thetotal curriculum. Child Environ. 1995;12(2):264–70.31. Morris, J.L., Zidenberg-Cherr, S. Garden-enhancednutrition curriculum improves fourth-grade schoolchildren’s knowledge of nutrition and preferences forsome vegetables. J Am Dietitic Assoc. 2002;102(1):91–3.32. Joshi, A., Ratcliffe, M.M. Causal pathways linking Farmto Schol to Childhood Obesity Prevention. Child Obes.2012;8(4):305–15.33. Lineberger, S.E., Zajicek, J.M. School gardens: Cana hands-on teaching tool affect students’ attitudesand behaviors regarding fruit and vegetables?HortTechnology. 2000;10(3):593–7.NATIONAL FARM TO SCHOOL NETWORK
- Page 1 and 2:
CHAPTER #: NAME OF CHAPTERIEvaluati
- Page 3 and 4:
IIITable of ContentsVVI010717252835
- Page 5 and 6:
VForewordDespite the investments ma
- Page 7 and 8:
VIILyn Kathlene®°Megan Kemple®°
- Page 9 and 10:
101IntroductionImage created by att
- Page 11 and 12:
CHAPTER 01: INTRODUCTION3approaches
- Page 13:
CHAPTER 01: INTRODUCTION5Policy-Lev
- Page 16 and 17:
8CHAPTER 02: BACKGROUNDThe Evolutio
- Page 18 and 19:
10CHAPTER 02: BACKGROUNDFigure 1Edu
- Page 20 and 21:
12CHAPTER 02: BACKGROUNDFigure 2Fig
- Page 22 and 23:
14CHAPTER 02: BACKGROUNDFigure 4: T
- Page 25 and 26:
CHAPTER 03: FRAMEWORK DEVELOPMENT P
- Page 27 and 28:
CHAPTER 03: FRAMEWORK DEVELOPMENT P
- Page 29 and 30:
CHAPTER 03: FRAMEWORK DEVELOPMENT P
- Page 31 and 32:
CHAPTER 03: FRAMEWORK DEVELOPMENT P
- Page 34 and 35:
26 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 36 and 37:
28 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 38 and 39:
30 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 40 and 41:
32 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 42 and 43:
34 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 44 and 45:
36 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 46 and 47:
38 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 48 and 49:
40 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 50 and 51:
42 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 54 and 55:
46 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 57 and 58:
CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, INDI
- Page 59 and 60:
CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, INDI
- Page 61:
CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, INDI
- Page 65 and 66:
CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, INDI
- Page 68 and 69:
60 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 70 and 71:
62 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 72 and 73:
64 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 74 and 75:
66 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 76 and 77: 68 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 78 and 79: 70 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 80 and 81: 72 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 82 and 83: 74 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 84 and 85: 76 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 86 and 87: 78 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 88 and 89: 80 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 90 and 91: 82 CHAPTER 04: PRIORITY OUTCOMES, I
- Page 93 and 94: CHAPTER 05: CONCLUSION AND NEXT STE
- Page 95 and 96: CHAPTER 05: CONCLUSION AND NEXT STE
- Page 97 and 98: CHAPTER 05: CONCLUSION AND NEXT STE
- Page 99 and 100: CHAPTER 05: CONCLUSION AND NEXT STE
- Page 101 and 102: CHAPTER 05: CONCLUSION AND NEXT STE
- Page 103 and 104: CHAPTER 05: CONCLUSION AND NEXT STE
- Page 105 and 106: CHAPTER 05: CONCLUSION AND NEXT STE
- Page 107 and 108: CHAPTER 05: CONCLUSION AND NEXT STE
- Page 109 and 110: CHAPTER 05: CONCLUSION AND NEXT STE
- Page 111 and 112: CHAPTER 05: CONCLUSION AND NEXT STE
- Page 113 and 114: 105ReferencesChapter 11. Joshi, A.,
- Page 115 and 116: 10746. Langellotto, G.A., Gupta, A.
- Page 117 and 118: 10918. Schneider, L., Chriqui, J.,
- Page 119 and 120: 11112. Mary, P.D.S., Karen, M., Kap
- Page 121 and 122: 11360. Zarling, P. When farm-to-sch
- Page 123 and 124: 115103. Story, M., Neumark-Sztainer
- Page 125: 11736. Eisner, R., Foster, S., Hans
- Page 129 and 130: 12158. Vermont Law School, Center f
- Page 131 and 132: 12352. Physicians for Social Respon
- Page 133 and 134: 12506Appendices
- Page 135 and 136: APPENDICES127Appendix 1Evaluation R
- Page 137 and 138: APPENDICES129• Evaluation Plannin
- Page 139 and 140: APPENDICES131Appendix 2Farm to Scho
- Page 141 and 142: APPENDICES133procurement and a guid
- Page 143 and 144: APPENDICES135Farm to School Core El
- Page 145 and 146: APPENDICES137Appendix 3 References1
- Page 147 and 148: APPENDICES139Appendix 5Sample Evalu
- Page 149 and 150: APPENDICES141• Healthy Eating, Ac
- Page 151 and 152: APPENDICES143Appendix 6Ideas for Fu
- Page 153: APPENDICES145• Amount of acres se