13.07.2015 Views

PROCEEDINGS May 15, 16, 17, 18, 2005 - Casualty Actuarial Society

PROCEEDINGS May 15, 16, 17, 18, 2005 - Casualty Actuarial Society

PROCEEDINGS May 15, 16, 17, 18, 2005 - Casualty Actuarial Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ESTIMATING THE WORKERS COMPENSATION TAIL 623TABLE 5.9PLDFs Indicated by the Trended Mortality ModelDuring Later Years of DevelopmentYear of DevelopmentAY 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 371966 1.02103 1.02124 1.02139 1.02147 1.02149 1.02146 1.02136 1.02121 1.02101 1.02077 1.020491967 1.02112 1.02134 1.02149 1.02<strong>15</strong>7 1.02<strong>16</strong>0 1.02<strong>15</strong>6 1.02147 1.02132 1.02113 1.02088 1.020601968 1.02121 1.02143 1.02<strong>15</strong>9 1.02<strong>16</strong>8 1.02<strong>17</strong>0 1.02<strong>16</strong>7 1.02<strong>15</strong>8 1.02143 1.02124 1.02100 1.020721969 1.02130 1.02<strong>15</strong>3 1.02<strong>16</strong>8 1.02<strong>17</strong>8 1.02<strong>18</strong>1 1.02<strong>17</strong>8 1.02<strong>16</strong>9 1.02<strong>15</strong>4 1.02135 1.02111 1.020831970 1.02140 1.02<strong>16</strong>3 1.02<strong>17</strong>9 1.02<strong>18</strong>9 1.02192 1.02<strong>18</strong>9 1.02<strong>18</strong>0 1.02<strong>16</strong>6 1.02147 1.02123 1.020951971 1.02148 1.02<strong>17</strong>1 1.02<strong>18</strong>7 1.02198 1.02201 1.02199 1.02190 1.02<strong>17</strong>6 1.02<strong>15</strong>7 1.02133 1.021061972 1.02<strong>15</strong>5 1.02<strong>17</strong>9 1.02196 1.02207 1.02211 1.02209 1.02200 1.02<strong>18</strong>7 1.02<strong>16</strong>8 1.02144 1.021<strong>16</strong>1973 1.02<strong>16</strong>3 1.02<strong>18</strong>7 1.02205 1.022<strong>16</strong> 1.02220 1.022<strong>18</strong> 1.02211 1.02197 1.02<strong>17</strong>8 1.02<strong>15</strong>5 1.021271974 1.02<strong>17</strong>0 1.02195 1.02213 1.02225 1.02230 1.02228 1.02221 1.02208 1.02<strong>18</strong>9 1.02<strong>16</strong>5 1.021381975 1.02<strong>17</strong>8 1.02203 1.02222 1.02234 1.02239 1.02238 1.02231 1.022<strong>18</strong> 1.02200 1.02<strong>17</strong>6 1.021481976 1.02<strong>18</strong>8 1.02214 1.02233 1.02245 1.02250 1.02250 1.02243 1.02230 1.02211 1.02<strong>18</strong>8 1.02<strong>16</strong>01977 1.02199 1.02225 1.02244 1.02256 1.02262 1.02261 1.02254 1.02241 1.02223 1.02200 1.02<strong>17</strong>2The constant PLDFs in the column for DY 2 merely reflect asimplifying assumption in the model.In Table 5.9 individual PLDFs generated by the model aredisplayed for accident years 1966—1977 for the most mature historicaldevelopment years. Projected PLDFs for the short-termfuture are also shown below the diagonal.Table 5.10 provides an example of the kinds of errors in estimatingfuture incremental payments that can occur when it isassumed that PLDFs for each year of development hold constant.First, a PLDF of 1.02138 is selected as the average of the latestfour historical factors during the 34th year of development (theboxed items in Table 5.9). By comparing this selection with thetrue underlying trended PLDF, the percentage error in incrementalpayments for that development year is shown for every fifthAY. These errors assume, however, that other similar errors didnot occur during preceding development years.Though all of the errors above are small, these errors compoundsignificantly in the calculation of tail factors, which arethe product of numerous individual PLDFs.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!