13.07.2015 Views

PROCEEDINGS May 15, 16, 17, 18, 2005 - Casualty Actuarial Society

PROCEEDINGS May 15, 16, 17, 18, 2005 - Casualty Actuarial Society

PROCEEDINGS May 15, 16, 17, 18, 2005 - Casualty Actuarial Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

738 THE “MODIFIED BORNHUETTER-FERGUSON” APPROACHThe amount of security a company holds should not be afunction of any particular ceded IBNR allocation methodology,but rather should be carefully considered as a function of theprobable maximum amount ceded to a reinsurer. Consider thefollowing much simplified example.A company insures two large buildings (A and B) for $1,000each. Separate unauthorized reinsurers fully reinsure each of thetwo policies that protect the buildings. During the reserve review,the company and the actuary become aware that one ofthe buildings was destroyed just prior to year end, though thereis no information on which building. The actuary adds a $1,000IBNR reserve, and a $1,000 ceded IBNR reserve, with no effecton the net reserves. These entries are made on Schedule P andon all Annual Statement pages that depend on Schedule P.On Schedule F, the $1,000 ceded IBNR reserve must be assignedto specific reinsurers. If building A was the one destroyed,then reinsurer A should be assigned the $1,000 ceded IBNR, andto the extent that security is required, it should be demanded.The same scenario applies to building B if that was the one destroyed.In practice, the $1,000 ceded IBNR reserve will almostcertainly be allocated between the two reinsurers, either fiftyfifty,or through some other methodology that guarantees thatone of the reinsurers will be inadequately secured. A probablemaximum ceded methodology would require the company to securea full $1,000 from both reinsurers.A ceded IBNR allocation will balance to the correct total, butwill expose the company to inadequate security for one reinsurer.A probable maximum ceded allocation will generate adequatesecurity from each reinsurer, but will result in an excessive cededIBNR total for Schedule F, and an inadequate, perhaps even anegative, net IBNR. The only way to assure adequate securitywould be for each reinsurer to place the full $1,000 in trust.Perhaps this discussion concerns the rationale of Schedule Fsecurity, whether funds withheld, letters of credit, ceded balances

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!