Radical innovation: crossing knowledge boundaries with ...
Radical innovation: crossing knowledge boundaries with ...
Radical innovation: crossing knowledge boundaries with ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Case Study: Theatres of Thinking<br />
Events such as workshops and sandpits are commonplace, especially during early<br />
phases, in interdisciplinary enterprises. However, the conduct of such events shows<br />
varying degrees of expertise. The most successful bring professional experience from<br />
outside both academia and business, often involving skills in theatre or design.<br />
Attempts to run such events <strong>with</strong>out sufficient expertise can jeopardise an initiative<br />
from the outset.<br />
Tom Inns, director of the interdisciplinary research programme Designing for the 21st<br />
Century is a leading expert. His ‘theatres of thinking’ are facilitated design workshops<br />
involving a wide range of physical media, drawing on his own professional<br />
background as a designer.<br />
They have been central to his work as programme director, <strong>with</strong> programme phases<br />
marked by workshops at which objectives are reviewed from across the multiple<br />
disciplinary perspectives of the programme.<br />
In a typical workshop, participants identified drivers of change for the field over the<br />
coming 15 years. They identified new <strong>knowledge</strong> and understanding would then be<br />
needed, modeled potential research project ideas in 3 dimensions on a large floor size<br />
portfolio map, then used that map to explore the criteria to evaluate and select projects<br />
for funding.<br />
http://www.theatresofthinking.org.uk/<br />
5.4.2 Visual representation and rhetoric<br />
New conceptualisations can be supported by the construction of visual representations<br />
either as boundary objects shared by members of a team (in Tom Inns’ workshops) or<br />
as objects of communication and persuasion that contain their own internal rhetoric.<br />
Novel visual representations can shift attention away from established disciplinary<br />
understanding. If developed in a collaborative context, they can also provide an<br />
opportunity for development of a shared mental model. We also heard reports of<br />
occasions in which something is ‘gained in translation’, where expressing statements<br />
in forms outside the established language of a particular discipline results in new<br />
insights. However, it is necessary to be cautious about those situations in which<br />
particular forms of visual representation have connotations arising from their<br />
association <strong>with</strong> a particular disciplinary tradition (Crilly, Blackwell & Clarkson<br />
2006). In that case, it may be the case that little is gained, because those from other<br />
disciplines fail to understand the content, or (perhaps worse), interpret the use of a<br />
particular representation as an unequal claim to authority. Quantitative graphs are<br />
associated <strong>with</strong> science and engineering, Powerpoint presentations are associated <strong>with</strong><br />
corporate business contexts, and coloured expressive visualisation is associated <strong>with</strong><br />
Innovation and Interdisciplinarity 52