03.12.2012 Views

Radical innovation: crossing knowledge boundaries with ...

Radical innovation: crossing knowledge boundaries with ...

Radical innovation: crossing knowledge boundaries with ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

order to obtain funding and employment prospects for the graduates. In this respect,<br />

they might be regarded as a kind of disciplinary evolution, stepping outside of<br />

existing departmental structures only because of the structural constraints that can<br />

make it hard to modify existing degree courses.<br />

An alternative view on the training of researchers is that they might be given the skills<br />

to respond individually to unanticipated problems, or trained to enter a research<br />

ecosystem in which different disciplines must work together to address a problem.<br />

This is far more characteristic of interdisciplinary research consortia such as<br />

Equator 42 , rather than more topically focused doctoral training centres. However, it is<br />

worth noting that this focus on ability to respond to problems in an innovative way is<br />

more characteristic of professional preparation than of conventional research training.<br />

The demand for interdisciplinary training of young researchers seems to anticipate a<br />

new role for universities as the providers of professional research services.<br />

When we considered companies whose established business involves the provision of<br />

precisely these kinds of professional research service, such as TTP 43 , we were told<br />

that their approach to recruitment is simply to find people <strong>with</strong> degrees in two<br />

different disciplines, rather than people who had received specifically<br />

interdisciplinary training. It is often the case that companies prefer to create their own<br />

mix of academic skills, rather than relying on universities to prepared students<br />

through focused cross-disciplinary degree courses. However, the business model of<br />

TTP is a consultancy one (discussed above), and is therefore constrained in terms of<br />

the kinds of <strong>innovation</strong> expected by their clients. Their recruitment policy may be<br />

primarily oriented toward the characteristics of this particular business.<br />

In all of these cases, we see that education is not a primary driver of interdisciplinary<br />

<strong>innovation</strong>, but at best responds to the limitations of existing disciplines in meeting<br />

the need of society for professional skills. Academic disciplines play a role in defining<br />

the body of professional <strong>knowledge</strong> - the mental models that are to be used by<br />

practitioners in that discipline. Both professional and academic disciplines develop<br />

particular styles of discourse, and particular habits of investigation, exploration and<br />

analysis. They also maintain themselves through mechanisms of evaluation by which<br />

a hierarchy of respect can be established among senior individuals, and criteria for<br />

membership can be enforced for the most junior. But ultimately, education is a way of<br />

distinguishing a disciplined professional identity relative to the general public. This<br />

may involve the chartered status conferred by legislation and professional bodies,<br />

which legitimises particular kinds of <strong>knowledge</strong>. However it also maintains separation<br />

between the discipline of the professional academic, and the kinds of <strong>knowledge</strong> or<br />

learning that are found outside universities.<br />

42 Expert witness report<br />

43 Expert witness report<br />

Innovation and Interdisciplinarity 69

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!