Radical innovation: crossing knowledge boundaries with ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Power, M. (1999) The audit society: rituals of verification. Oxford University Press: Oxford. Rhoten, D. 2007. Interdisciplinary Research: Trend or Transition. Items and Issues 5, 6-12, http://www.ssrc.org/publications/items/items_5.1- 2/interdisciplinary_research.pdf. Roper, S., J. Love, and J. Du. (2007). The Limits of Open Innovation: openness and (quasi) markets in the organization of innovation. Aston Business School Research Papers. Rossini, F. A., and A. L. Porter. (1985). Peer Review of Interdisciplinary Research Proposals. Science Technology and Human Values 10, 33-38. Schmickl, C. and Kieser, A. (2008). How much do specialists have to learn from each other when they jointly develop radical product innovations? Research Policy 37, 1148-1163 Schön, D.A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books. Strathern, M., ed. (2000) Audit cultures. anthropological studies in accountability, ethics and the academy [EASA series in Social Anthropology]. London: Routledge. Strathern, M. (2004a). Commons and Borderlands. Wantage: Sean Kingston. Strathern, M. (2004b). Robust knowledge and fragile futures. in Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics and Ethics as Anthropological Problems. New York: Blackwell. Strathern, M. (2005). Experiments in Interdisciplinarity. Social Anthropology 13, 75- 90. Strathern, M. (2006). A community of critics? Thoughts on new knowledge. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 12, 191-209. The Shock of the Not Quite New. The Economist, 18 June 1994 Thrift, N. (2006). Re-inventing invention: new tendencies in capitalist commodification. Economy and Society 35(2), 279-306. Tress, G., T. Barbel, and G. Fry. (2004). Clarifying Integrative Research Concepts in Landscape Ecology. Landscape Ecology 20, 479-493. Tuomi, I. (2006). Networks of Innovation: Change and Meaning in the Age of the Internet. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Tushman, M., W. Smith, R. Chapman Wood, G. Westerman, and C. O’Reilly. (2006). Organizational Designs and Innovation Streams. Harvard Business School Working Papers. Innovation and Interdisciplinarity 94
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge University Press. Weszkalnys, G. nd. Mapping Interdisciplinarity. Report of the survey element of the project ‘Interdisciplinarity and Society: A Critical Comparative Study’, ESRC Science in Society, 2004-06. accessed December 2007 at: http://www.ouce.ox.ac.uk/research/technologies/projects/mappinginterdisciplinarity.pdf. Whitfield, J. (2008). An indifference to boundaries (special report). Nature 451, 872- 873. (21 February) doi:10.1038/451872a Wickson, F., A. L. Carew, and A. W. Russell. (2006). Transdisciplinary research: characteristics, quandries and quality. Futures 38, 1046-1059. Innovation and Interdisciplinarity 95
Page 1 and 2:
Technical Report Number 760 Radical
Page 3 and 4:
Radical innovation: crossing knowle
Page 5 and 6:
1.2. Contents 1.1. Executive summar
Page 7 and 8:
2. Introduction Innovation is not a
Page 9 and 10:
2.1. Definitions Several readers of
Page 11 and 12:
perhaps by exploiting emerging tech
Page 13 and 14:
3.1.1 A key enabler: the ‘pole-st
Page 15 and 16:
ought together. � The collective
Page 17 and 18:
these perceptions of lack of discip
Page 19 and 20:
ecause they reconfigure existing ma
Page 21 and 22:
develop and deliver based on the te
Page 23 and 24:
problems of society are complex - a
Page 25 and 26:
analytic consistency. Although not
Page 27 and 28:
expertise might be better utilised.
Page 29 and 30:
intellectual approaches. It is not
Page 31 and 32:
The need for and management of inte
Page 33 and 34:
different language). Rather, they h
Page 35 and 36:
4. Wedding Creativity and Knowledge
Page 37 and 38:
literature (e.g. Klein 1996, Latucc
Page 39 and 40:
our project, if it were possible to
Page 41 and 42:
transmitted to it’, through ‘cr
Page 43 and 44: e seen as invalid because of the fa
Page 45 and 46: period of time, both because it is
Page 47 and 48: where I do not know and like my nei
Page 49 and 50: interdisciplinary projects. It is a
Page 51 and 52: developed to stimulate creativity w
Page 53 and 54: the work of artists (or perhaps pri
Page 55 and 56: ideological advances. Many projects
Page 57 and 58: designers. Peter Guthrie 32 and the
Page 59 and 60: own right, and its ethical foundati
Page 61 and 62: is conventionally assessed in terms
Page 63 and 64: igour that can be assessed objectiv
Page 65 and 66: obliquely or in passing as their
Page 67 and 68: the people who ‘identify the obvi
Page 69 and 70: order to obtain funding and employm
Page 71 and 72: 7. Obstacles to interdisciplinary i
Page 73 and 74: advancement within the elite hierar
Page 75 and 76: New fields of study often arise in
Page 77 and 78: Metrication would not be necessary
Page 79 and 80: kinds of knowledge led to negotiati
Page 81 and 82: 8. Innovation policy - policy for i
Page 83 and 84: impact. Extrinsic impact involves s
Page 85 and 86: One important role for the public p
Page 87 and 88: 9. Contributors and Acknowledgement
Page 89 and 90: 10. Bibliography Adams, J., Jackson
Page 91 and 92: Hallam, E. and Ingold, T. (eds.) (2
Page 93: Merton, P., and E. Barber. (2004).
Page 97 and 98: are expected to be meaningful to th
Page 99 and 100: disciplinary theory bases or termin
Page 101 and 102: argued that the well-developed SET
Page 103 and 104: these disciplines to a subsidiary o
Page 105 and 106: In a later article on the subject N
Page 107 and 108: One interesting discovery was that
Page 109 and 110: innovation might take in practice t
Page 111 and 112: any in-depth analysis into how and
Page 113 and 114: interdisciplinarity as presented to
Page 115 and 116: 14. Appendix D: Advice on how to do
Page 117 and 118: technical innovation � utilize ex
Page 119 and 120: � need not have a clear business
Page 121 and 122: � successful researchers have spa
Page 123 and 124: � use visualisation and visual st
show all

Radical innovation: crossing knowledge boundaries with ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?