Radical innovation: crossing knowledge boundaries with ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Latour, B. (2008). A cautious Prometheus? A few steps toward a philosophy of design (with special attention to Peter Sloterdijk). Keynote lecture to Design History Society conference, Falmouth Cornwall, 3 September 2008. Latucca, L. R. (2001). Creating Interdisciplinarity: Interdisciplinary Research and Teaching among College and University Faculty. Vanderbilt: Vanderbilt University Press. Leitner, D., Wilson L. (2007). Troublesome knowledge: some lessons to be learnt from the pedagogy of Sundanese martial arts? ESRC-EPSRC Seminar Series: Transforming perspectives: technology to support teaching and learning of threshold concepts. 15 th January, St John’s College, University of Cambridge. Lester, R & Piore, M (2004). Innovation: The Missing Dimension. Harvard University Press. Levitt, J.M. and Thelwall, M. (2008). Is multi-disciplinary research more highly cited? a macro-level study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59(12), 1973-1984. Lin, Y.-W., R. Procter, P. Halfpenny, A. Voss, and K. Baird. nd. An action-oriented ethnography of interdisciplinary social scientific work. Lingard, L., Espin, S., Evans, C. and Hawryluck, L. (2004). The rules of the game: Interprofessional collaboration on the intensive care unit team. Critical Care 8:R403- R408 Lloyd, G.E.R. (2009). Disciplines in the making. Oxford University Press. Love, J. (2007). Supermodality and Complementarity in the Organization of Innovation: Full Research Report. ESRC End of Award Report, RES-000-22-0813 Swindon: ESRC. Love, J., S. Roper, and G. Mangiarotti. (2006). Organising the innovation process: Complementarities in Innovation Networking. Aston Business School Research Papers. MacKenzie, D. and Spinardi, G. (1995). Tacit knowledge, weapons design and the uninvention of nuclear weapons. American Journal of Sociology 101(1), 44-99. Mansilla, V. B., and H. Gardner. (2006). Symptoms of quality: Assessing expert interdisciplinary work at the frontier - an empirical exploration. Research Evaluation 15, 17-29. Massey, C., Alpass, F., Flett, R., Lewis, K., Morriss, S. and Sligo, F. (2006). Crossing fields: the case of a multi-disciplinary research team. Qualitative Research 6(2), 131- 147 DOI: 10.1177/1468794106062706 Innovation and Interdisciplinarity 92
Merton, P., and E. Barber. (2004). The Travels and Adventures of Serendipity. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press. Metcalf, J., M. Riedlinger, A. Pisarski, and J. Gardner. (2006). Collaborating across sectors. The relationships between the humanities, arts and social sciences (HASS) and science, technology, engineering and medicine (STEM) sectors. CHASS Occasional Papers. Miller, R. C. (1982). Varieties of interdisciplinary approaches in the social sciences. Issues in Integrative Studies 1, 1-37. Mulgan, G., R. Ali, R. Halkett, and B. Sanders. (2007). In and out of sync. The challenge of growing social innovations. NESTA report. http://www.nesta.org.uk/assets/pdf/In_and_out_of_sync_report_NESTA.pdf. National Academies (U.S.). Committee on Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research, Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy (U.S.), National Academy of Sciences (U.S.), National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine (U.S.) (2005). Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research. National Academies Press NESTA. (2006). The Innovation Gap. Why policy needs to reflect the reality of innovation in the UK. NESTA report. http://www.nesta.org.uk/assets/pdf/innovation_gap_report_NESTA.pdf. New Media Partners. (2002). Barriers to the realisation of creative ideas. Executive summary of NESTA report. http://www.nesta.org.uk/assets/pdf/consultation_analysis.pdf. Newell, S. and Swan, J. (2000). Trust and inter-organizational networking. Human Relations 53(10), 1287-1328. Nowotny, H. (2007). The Potential of Transdisciplinarity. accessed December 2008 at: http://www.interdisciplines.org/interdisciplinarity/papers/5. O’Connor, G.C., Rice, M.P., Peters, L. and Veryzer, R.W. (2003). Managing Interdisciplinary, Longitudinal Research Teams: Extending Grounded Theory- Building Methodologies. Organization Science 14(4), 353-373 DOI: 10.1287/orsc.14.4.353.17485 Owen, G. (2004). Where are the big gorillas? High technology entrepeneurship in the UK and the role of public policy. Paper presented at Diebold Conference on Entrepreneurship, April 2004 http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/MES/pdf/Entrepreneurship%20main%20edit1.pdf Parker, S. and Ford, E. (2008). Principles for networked innovation: Learning lessons from the RSA Networks project http://groups.google.com/group/openrsa/attach/e9d1ecd4544877cd/NESTA+RSA+Ne tworks+Evaluation.pdf?part=5 Innovation and Interdisciplinarity 93
Page 1 and 2:
Technical Report Number 760 Radical
Page 3 and 4:
Radical innovation: crossing knowle
Page 5 and 6:
1.2. Contents 1.1. Executive summar
Page 7 and 8:
2. Introduction Innovation is not a
Page 9 and 10:
2.1. Definitions Several readers of
Page 11 and 12:
perhaps by exploiting emerging tech
Page 13 and 14:
3.1.1 A key enabler: the ‘pole-st
Page 15 and 16:
ought together. � The collective
Page 17 and 18:
these perceptions of lack of discip
Page 19 and 20:
ecause they reconfigure existing ma
Page 21 and 22:
develop and deliver based on the te
Page 23 and 24:
problems of society are complex - a
Page 25 and 26:
analytic consistency. Although not
Page 27 and 28:
expertise might be better utilised.
Page 29 and 30:
intellectual approaches. It is not
Page 31 and 32:
The need for and management of inte
Page 33 and 34:
different language). Rather, they h
Page 35 and 36:
4. Wedding Creativity and Knowledge
Page 37 and 38:
literature (e.g. Klein 1996, Latucc
Page 39 and 40:
our project, if it were possible to
Page 41 and 42: transmitted to it’, through ‘cr
Page 43 and 44: e seen as invalid because of the fa
Page 45 and 46: period of time, both because it is
Page 47 and 48: where I do not know and like my nei
Page 49 and 50: interdisciplinary projects. It is a
Page 51 and 52: developed to stimulate creativity w
Page 53 and 54: the work of artists (or perhaps pri
Page 55 and 56: ideological advances. Many projects
Page 57 and 58: designers. Peter Guthrie 32 and the
Page 59 and 60: own right, and its ethical foundati
Page 61 and 62: is conventionally assessed in terms
Page 63 and 64: igour that can be assessed objectiv
Page 65 and 66: obliquely or in passing as their
Page 67 and 68: the people who ‘identify the obvi
Page 69 and 70: order to obtain funding and employm
Page 71 and 72: 7. Obstacles to interdisciplinary i
Page 73 and 74: advancement within the elite hierar
Page 75 and 76: New fields of study often arise in
Page 77 and 78: Metrication would not be necessary
Page 79 and 80: kinds of knowledge led to negotiati
Page 81 and 82: 8. Innovation policy - policy for i
Page 83 and 84: impact. Extrinsic impact involves s
Page 85 and 86: One important role for the public p
Page 87 and 88: 9. Contributors and Acknowledgement
Page 89 and 90: 10. Bibliography Adams, J., Jackson
Page 91: Hallam, E. and Ingold, T. (eds.) (2
Page 95 and 96: Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of p
Page 97 and 98: are expected to be meaningful to th
Page 99 and 100: disciplinary theory bases or termin
Page 101 and 102: argued that the well-developed SET
Page 103 and 104: these disciplines to a subsidiary o
Page 105 and 106: In a later article on the subject N
Page 107 and 108: One interesting discovery was that
Page 109 and 110: innovation might take in practice t
Page 111 and 112: any in-depth analysis into how and
Page 113 and 114: interdisciplinarity as presented to
Page 115 and 116: 14. Appendix D: Advice on how to do
Page 117 and 118: technical innovation � utilize ex
Page 119 and 120: � need not have a clear business
Page 121 and 122: � successful researchers have spa
Page 123 and 124: � use visualisation and visual st
show all

Radical innovation: crossing knowledge boundaries with ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?