A Century <strong>of</strong> Promise • 177marital property relations <strong>of</strong> the precodification era. The attempt to introduce theVerwaltungsgemeinschaft under the ALR met with considerable popular resistance.Many Prussians simply invoked their freedom to contract and either amended orsuspended the ALR’s provisions outright.In Posen and northern Westphalia, where the ALR was the principal source <strong>of</strong>the statutory regime, propertied couples contracted alternative arrangements. Whilethe overall contract rate in these regions was comparatively low, the highest contractrate was amongst the very middle-class constituency that liberals claimed to representand, who, therefore, should have welcomed the Verwaltungsgemeinschaft. InPosen, for example, in 5.2 percent <strong>of</strong> all marriages there were registered agreementsand these prenuptial contracts suspended or amended the ALR’s provisions. 59 Of the3,704 registered contracts, 2,384 were entered by couples classified in the ‘Handelund Gewerbe (business and trade)’ category. This meant that 64 percent <strong>of</strong> all maritalcontracts came from Posen’s middle class. The PCR showed a high contract rateamongst Jews, as well, some 684 contracts <strong>of</strong> the total 3,704. Posen had a large Jewishcommunity, where Dotalrecht was the preferred form, but, as the numbers show,prenuptial agreements were, in fact, more common amongst the gentile bourgeoisie.Although the marriage statistics for northern Westphalia were less reliable, the reportshowed some 1,802 marital contracts. Again, the lion’s share were filed by middleclasscouples. 60 The PCR showed 1,339 small business owners and 69 large businessowners, for a combined rate <strong>of</strong> 78 percent out <strong>of</strong> the 1,802 total. Following the smallbusiness owner, the next highest contract rate came from small landowners. They registered246 contracts or 13.6 percent <strong>of</strong> the total. The report showed 27 contracts forlarge landowners or 1.5 percent. The combined rural rate was 15 percent <strong>of</strong> the total.In Prussian regions where the ALR was not the source <strong>of</strong> the statutory regime,but rather an older form <strong>of</strong> marital community was the statutory system and whereconditions were more favorable to women, the contract rate dropped significantly.In Brandenburg, where the ALR was suspended altogether as well as the Province<strong>of</strong> Saxony and Silesia, where its marital property law was suspended and replacedwith getrenntes Güterrecht, the marriage rate was 4 percent (8,859,572 people withabout 350,000 marriages), and there were no registered agreements. In contrast toPosen, in Pomerania, where the business class comprised only a small section <strong>of</strong> thegeneral population, the contract rate fell to from 5.2 percent to 3.7 percent. Whilethe marriage rate was also 5 percent, out <strong>of</strong> some 66,500 marriages, there were only2,487 contracts. In areas where Dotalrecht was in effect, the number <strong>of</strong> agreementsincreased. However, this seems to have involved the fixing <strong>of</strong> terms and conditionsrelative to the dowry. 61By comparing the PCR’s numbers on eastern Koblenz and the Rhineland, an evensharper indication <strong>of</strong> popular resistance to the reintroduction <strong>of</strong> the Code civil’s administrativecommunity is discernable. In Koblenz, where the <strong>German</strong> form <strong>of</strong> Errungenschaftsgemeinschaftand Mobiliengemeinschaft remained the basis <strong>of</strong> maritalproperty relations, the contract rate was significantly lower than in the Rhineland.
178 • The <strong>Making</strong> <strong>of</strong> a <strong>German</strong> <strong>Constitution</strong>The PCR showed 8,292 marriages in a total population <strong>of</strong> 160,696 people. Therewere only 62 contracts, for a 5 percent marriage rate and .72 percent contract rate.In the Rhineland, however, where the Code civil introduced the administrative communityand rigorously disenfranchised women, the marriage rate dropped and thecontract rate was much higher than in Koblenz. The PCR showed a population <strong>of</strong>3.2 million with 140,000 marriages and a staggering 9,938 registered prenuptial agreements.The marriage rate was lower, only 4 percent, but the contract rate escalatedto 7.1 percent compared to the 5 percent and .72 percent in eastern Koblenz. 62 Of the9,938 contracts registered in the Rhineland, 5,221 were from couples classified in theHandel und Gewerbe category and 779 from the Grosshandel category. That was arate <strong>of</strong> 52.2 percent and 7.8 percent, respectively, and a combined rate <strong>of</strong> 60 percent<strong>of</strong> the total 9,938. Interestingly, the percentage <strong>of</strong> rural contracts also increased significantlycompared to other regions in Prussia. The report showed 3,889 couplesfrom the ländliche Bevölkerung category and 204 from the grosse Besitze category.The contract rate here was 39 percent and 2 percent, respectively, and a much highercombined rate <strong>of</strong> 41 percent, in contrast to Westphalia’s 15 percent. 63In the South, Bavaria’s report, Darstellung des im Königreiche Bayern bestehendenehelichen Güterrechts (1877), showed such great variation in the nature <strong>of</strong>marital property relations that it was impossible to draw a general assessment on thebasis <strong>of</strong> the report. The report indicated that the most common regime was separation<strong>of</strong> property in the form <strong>of</strong> Roman Dotalrecht and various, unidentified partikulareGütergemeinschaften. For the years 1851 to 1875, the overall contract rate stood at38 percent (821,027 marriages and 314,301 marital agreements). Yet, in Oberbayern,Niederbayern, Oberpfalz and Schwaben, the rate was much higher, 56 percent,62.5 percent, 57 percent and 54 percent, respectively. These were regions where therehad been some attempt to reintroduce an administrative community. In Oberfrankenand Mittelfranken the rate was comparable to Posen, Pomerania and Westphalia. Thereport showed rates <strong>of</strong> 13.3 percent in Oberfranken and 12 percent in Mittelfranken,respectively. Unterfranken had the lowest contract rate <strong>of</strong> 8.5 percent, and, not surprisinglyit was a region <strong>of</strong> varied local and city laws. 64Nowhere are historians <strong>of</strong>fered a sharper image <strong>of</strong> couples’ resistance to the reintroduction<strong>of</strong> the administrative community than in Baden. In 1809, the Civil Code <strong>of</strong>Baden attempted to void the particular laws and create legal uniformity. The Code’sfamily law mirrored the Code civil and tried to introduce a system <strong>of</strong> Verwaltungsgemeinschaft.However, the liberty to contract returned after the Freiheitskriege. Asa result, Baden’s report on marital property relations revealed a staggering rate <strong>of</strong>marital contracts. 65 For the years 1871 to 1874, only 52 percent <strong>of</strong> couples in Badenmaintained the statutory regime. According to the report, in 48 percent <strong>of</strong> all marriages,there were written contracts that outright abandoned the statutory regime <strong>of</strong> Baden’sCode. In 32 percent <strong>of</strong> marriages, the Errungenschaftsgemeinschaft was adoptedand, in 16 percent, the allgemeine Gütergemeinschaft was the basis <strong>of</strong> marital propertyrelations. An even stronger indication <strong>of</strong> the unpopularity <strong>of</strong> the administrative
- Page 2 and 3:
The Making of a German Constitution
- Page 4:
The Making of a German Constitution
- Page 58 and 59:
Prelude to Modern Germany • 43for
- Page 60 and 61:
Prelude to Modern Germany • 45Nev
- Page 62 and 63:
Prelude to Modern Germany • 47pre
- Page 64 and 65:
Prelude to Modern Germany • 49the
- Page 66 and 67:
Prelude to Modern Germany • 51The
- Page 68 and 69:
Prelude to Modern Germany • 5326.
- Page 70 and 71:
Prelude to Modern Germany • 5585.
- Page 72 and 73:
-2-Toward a German NationFriedrich
- Page 74 and 75:
Toward a German Nation • 59legisl
- Page 76 and 77:
Toward a German Nation • 61Savign
- Page 78 and 79:
Toward a German Nation • 63to the
- Page 80 and 81:
Toward a German Nation • 65govern
- Page 82 and 83:
Toward a German Nation • 67Legisl
- Page 84 and 85:
Toward a German Nation • 69Lübec
- Page 86 and 87:
Toward a German Nation • 71which
- Page 88 and 89:
Toward a German Nation • 73earlie
- Page 90 and 91:
Toward a German Nation • 75Refini
- Page 92 and 93:
Toward a German Nation • 77transf
- Page 94 and 95:
Toward a German Nation • 79diffid
- Page 96 and 97:
Toward a German Nation • 81respon
- Page 98 and 99:
Toward a German Nation • 83Writin
- Page 100 and 101:
Toward a German Nation • 85unders
- Page 102 and 103:
Toward a German Nation • 87The go
- Page 104 and 105:
Toward a German Nation • 89The va
- Page 106 and 107:
Toward a German Nation • 91was al
- Page 108 and 109:
Toward a German Nation • 9338. Bl
- Page 110 and 111:
Toward a German Nation • 95101. F
- Page 112 and 113:
Toward a German Nation • 97167. F
- Page 114 and 115:
-3-Images of the GemeinwesenThe Ger
- Page 116 and 117:
Images of the Gemeinwesen • 101th
- Page 118 and 119:
Images of the Gemeinwesen • 103of
- Page 120 and 121:
Images of the Gemeinwesen • 105re
- Page 122 and 123:
Images of the Gemeinwesen • 107de
- Page 124 and 125:
Images of the Gemeinwesen • 109ge
- Page 126 and 127:
Images of the Gemeinwesen • 111pu
- Page 128 and 129:
Images of the Gemeinwesen • 113Nu
- Page 130 and 131:
Images of the Gemeinwesen • 115Eu
- Page 132 and 133:
Images of the Gemeinwesen • 117Wh
- Page 134 and 135:
Images of the Gemeinwesen • 119co
- Page 136 and 137:
Images of the Gemeinwesen • 121co
- Page 138 and 139:
Images of the Gemeinwesen • 123th
- Page 140 and 141:
Images of the Gemeinwesen • 12525
- Page 142 and 143: Images of the Gemeinwesen • 12791
- Page 144 and 145: Images of the Gemeinwesen • 12917
- Page 146 and 147: -4-Undermining AbsolutismThe Path o
- Page 148 and 149: Undermining Absolutism • 133sat o
- Page 150 and 151: Undermining Absolutism • 135for a
- Page 152 and 153: Undermining Absolutism • 137the p
- Page 154 and 155: Undermining Absolutism • 139in mi
- Page 156 and 157: Undermining Absolutism • 141jury
- Page 158 and 159: Undermining Absolutism • 143Reich
- Page 160 and 161: Undermining Absolutism • 145journ
- Page 162 and 163: Undermining Absolutism • 147found
- Page 164 and 165: Undermining Absolutism • 149In th
- Page 166 and 167: Undermining Absolutism • 151The B
- Page 168 and 169: Undermining Absolutism • 153subse
- Page 170 and 171: Undermining Absolutism • 1551840.
- Page 172 and 173: Undermining Absolutism • 157the H
- Page 174 and 175: Undermining Absolutism • 159Compr
- Page 176 and 177: Undermining Absolutism • 16137. M
- Page 178 and 179: Undermining Absolutism • 16396. J
- Page 180 and 181: Undermining Absolutism • 165140.
- Page 182 and 183: -5-A Century of PromiseEheliches G
- Page 184 and 185: A Century of Promise • 169in Germ
- Page 186 and 187: A Century of Promise • 171of work
- Page 188 and 189: A Century of Promise • 173scholar
- Page 190 and 191: A Century of Promise • 175was ess
- Page 194 and 195: A Century of Promise • 179communi
- Page 196 and 197: A Century of Promise • 181Court w
- Page 198 and 199: A Century of Promise • 183be unde
- Page 200 and 201: A Century of Promise • 1851900. I
- Page 202 and 203: A Century of Promise • 18755. For
- Page 204 and 205: -6-Last BastionThe Bürgerliches Ge
- Page 206 and 207: Last Bastion • 191prominent liber
- Page 208 and 209: Last Bastion • 193Osnabrück, her
- Page 210 and 211: Last Bastion • 195be equal, as th
- Page 212 and 213: Last Bastion • 197The Eulenburg-M
- Page 214 and 215: Last Bastion • 199and, when Wilhe
- Page 216 and 217: Last Bastion • 201magnified onto
- Page 218 and 219: Last Bastion • 203but equal to ot
- Page 220 and 221: Last Bastion • 205the wall. 103 A
- Page 222 and 223: Last Bastion • 207of tender ages
- Page 224 and 225: Last Bastion • 2091368) and inher
- Page 226 and 227: Last Bastion • 211for legal unity
- Page 228 and 229: Last Bastion • 213Politiker nach
- Page 230 and 231: Last Bastion • 21559. Ibid.60. Wi
- Page 232 and 233: Last Bastion • 217110. Ibid., p.
- Page 234 and 235: -7-Discontent in the Bürgerliche S
- Page 236 and 237: Discontent in the Bürgerliche Soci
- Page 238 and 239: Discontent in the Bürgerliche Soci
- Page 240 and 241: Discontent in the Bürgerliche Soci
- Page 242 and 243:
Discontent in the Bürgerliche Soci
- Page 244 and 245:
Discontent in the Bürgerliche Soci
- Page 246 and 247:
Discontent in the Bürgerliche Soci
- Page 248 and 249:
Discontent in the Bürgerliche Soci
- Page 250 and 251:
Discontent in the Bürgerliche Soci
- Page 252 and 253:
Discontent in the Bürgerliche Soci
- Page 254 and 255:
Discontent in the Bürgerliche Soci
- Page 256 and 257:
Discontent in the Bürgerliche Soci
- Page 258 and 259:
Discontent in the Bürgerliche Soci
- Page 260 and 261:
Discontent in the Bürgerliche Soci
- Page 262 and 263:
Discontent in the Bürgerliche Soci
- Page 264 and 265:
Discontent in the Bürgerliche Soci
- Page 266 and 267:
-8-ConclusionThe German Idea of Rev
- Page 268 and 269:
Conclusion • 253revolution affect
- Page 270 and 271:
Conclusion • 255Savigny’s call
- Page 272 and 273:
Conclusion • 257violent movement,
- Page 274 and 275:
Conclusion • 259supremacy of the
- Page 276 and 277:
Conclusion • 2611354 granted the
- Page 278 and 279:
Conclusion • 263cannot be denied,
- Page 280 and 281:
Conclusion • 26532. Achim Kurz, D
- Page 282 and 283:
BibliographyAaslestad, K., ‘Old V
- Page 284 and 285:
Bibliography • 269Bachrach, D.,
- Page 286 and 287:
Bibliography • 271Bruns, C., ‘T
- Page 288 and 289:
Bibliography • 273Engels, F., The
- Page 290 and 291:
Bibliography • 275Grimm, D., ‘D
- Page 292 and 293:
Bibliography • 277Jenks, E., Law
- Page 294 and 295:
Bibliography • 279Lange, H., ‘F
- Page 296 and 297:
Bibliography • 281Nauert, C., Hum
- Page 298 and 299:
Bibliography • 283Quataert, J., R
- Page 300 and 301:
Bibliography • 285Schleiermacher,
- Page 302 and 303:
Bibliography • 287Thibaut, A., Ü
- Page 304 and 305:
IndexAlbrecht, Wilhelm, 141, 203All
- Page 306 and 307:
Index • 291economic consideration
- Page 308 and 309:
Index • 293law journals, founding
- Page 310 and 311:
Index • 295Schroeder, Richard, 16