Making of a German Constitution : a Slow Revolution

Discontent in the Bürgerliche Society 1900–1933 • 24562. Ibid.63. Lewis Henry Morgan, Ancient Society, or, Researches in the Lines of HumanProgress from Savagery through Barbarism to Civilization (1877).64. Lawrence Krader (ed.), The Ethnological Notebooks of Karl Marx: Studies ofMorgan, Phear, Maine, Lubbock (1974).65. Friedrich Engels, The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State, inthe Light of the Researches of Lewis H. Morgan (1972), p. 9.66. Ibid.67. Friedrich Engels, Origin of the Family, pp. 9–10.68. Friedrich Engels, cited in Trautmann, Lewis Henry Morgan, p. 254.69. Ibid., p. 133.70. Ibid.71. Wilhelm Liebknecht, ‘Socialism’, reprinted in William Pelz (ed.), WilhelmLiebknecht and German Social Democracy: A Documentary History, ErichHahn (trans.) (1994), p. 229.72. Ibid.73. Ibid.74. John H. Kautsky, Karl Kautsky: Marxism, Revolution and Democracy (1994), p.224.75. Jean H. Quataert, Reluctant Feminists in German Social Democracy, 1885–1917(1979), p. 69.76. Ibid., p. 70.77. Richard Evans, Sozialdemokratie und Frauenemanzipation im deutschen Kaiserreich(1984), p. 42.78. Ibid., pp. 43–4.79. Ibid.80. Moira Donald, ‘Introduction’, in August Bebel, Women in the Past, Present andFuture, Adams Walther (trans.) (1988), p. iii.81. Quataert, Reluctant Feminists, p. 16.82. Richard Evans, The Feminist Movement in Germany 1894–1933 (1976).83. Anne Lopes and Gary Roth, Men’s Feminism: August Bebel and the GermanSocialist Movement (2000), pp. 46–7.84. August Bebel, Die Frau und der Sozialismus (1980), pp. 45–78.85. Ibid., p. 45.86. Ibid., p. 61.87. Ibid., p. 57.88. Ibid., p. 61.89. Joan Scott, ‘Gender: A Useful Category of Historical Analysis’, in Joan Scott,Gender and the Politics of History (1988).90. Evans, Feminist Movement in Germany, p. 24.91. Ibid.92. Ibid., p. 13.