Making of a German Constitution : a Slow Revolution

Prelude to Modern Germany • 5585. Ibid.86. Ibid., p. 204.87. Ibid., p. 205.88. Ibid.89. Cited in ibid., p. 20690. Cited in ibid., pp. 206–7.91. Ibid., p. 207.92. Cited in ibid.93. Ibid., p. 211.94. Ibid.95. Cited in ibid., p. 212.96. Cited in ibid.97. For more on Roman law see Peter Stern, Roman Law in European History(1999).98. Michael Stolleis (ed.), Hermann Conring: Beiträge zu Leben und Werk (1983),and Albrecht von Arnswaldt, De Vicariatus controversia: Beiträge HermannConrings in der Diskussion um die Reichsverfassung des 17. Jahrhunderts(2004). For a recent English translation see Hermann Conring’s New Discourseof the Roman-German Emperor, Constantin Fasolt (trans.) (2005).99. Michael Stolleis, ‘Die Einheit der Wissenschaft’, in Stolleis (ed.), HermannConring, p. 17.100. Hermann Conring’s New Discourse, p. 63.101. Ibid.102. Ibid., p. 81.103. Constantin Fasolt, ‘Introduction’, in ibid., p. xxv, fn. 20.104. Michael Stolleis, ‘Machiavellismus und Staatsräson’, in Stolleis (ed.), HermannConring, pp. 177, 180 and 194–5.105. Ibid., p. 177.106. Horst Dreitzel, ‘Hermann Conring und die politische Wissenschaft seinerZeit’, in Stolleis (ed.), Hermann Conring, pp. 135–72.107. Fasolt, ‘Introduction’, p. ix.108. Hans Bödeker, ‘Debating the respublica mixta: German and Dutch PoliticalDiscourses around 1700’, in van Gelderen and Skinner (eds), Republicanism,pp. 219–46.109. Johann Jakob Moser, Teutsches Staats-Recht (1737–1757), vol. 1, p. 105, citedin Mack Walker, Johann Jakob Moser and the Holy Roman Empire of the GermanNation (1981), p. 146.110. Walker, Johann Jakob Moser, pp. 145–9.111. Peter Wilson, War, State and Society in Württemberg, 1677–1793 (1995), p. 54and, for the last two paragraphs, pp. 46–54.112. Ibid., pp. 184–98.113. Walker, Johann Jakob Moser, pp. 237–45.