13.07.2015 Views

Making of a German Constitution : a Slow Revolution

Making of a German Constitution : a Slow Revolution

Making of a German Constitution : a Slow Revolution

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

44 • The <strong>Making</strong> <strong>of</strong> a <strong>German</strong> <strong>Constitution</strong>in his De consilio politico axiomata aliquam multa (1622), in which senates andpopular assemblies were the sources <strong>of</strong> prudence, stability and virtue. 95 In a mixedconstitution, as he later extolled in Principium et finis politicae (1626), ‘the rights<strong>of</strong> majesty’ are divided between the prince and assemblies <strong>of</strong> the estates and ‘thismixture seems to be the most finely balanced harmony, for some powers are best exercisedby one person, such as the power <strong>of</strong> judging and imposing punishments, thereare others in which the participation <strong>of</strong> the orders or estates could hardly be deniedwithout inequity’. 96To close this section, the goal here has been to show, first, that the identification<strong>of</strong> sovereignty with jurisdiction was informed and strengthened by the politicalthought <strong>of</strong> the Reformation. The doctrine <strong>of</strong> jurisdiction emerged philosophicallyand was theoretically organized on the basis <strong>of</strong> <strong>German</strong> practices and rationalizedby <strong>German</strong> legal scholars. In addition, the continuity in the juridical organization<strong>of</strong> <strong>German</strong> political thought should also be kept in mind by readers. Finally, whilereferences to classical learning abounded, this again was appropriated to support theevolving traditional arrangements <strong>of</strong> self-governance. Both Eisermann and Oldendorphad practical experience in municipal judicial systems and had participated inthe reformatio <strong>of</strong> urban laws.Hermann Conring and Early Modern Legal RadicalismIn the <strong>German</strong> case, the legal radicalism <strong>of</strong> the modern era was shaped by the legalradicalism <strong>of</strong> the premodern period. While, in recent years, scholars have identifiedthe scientization <strong>of</strong> urban law as the most salient feature <strong>of</strong> the Reception <strong>of</strong>Roman Law, typically, the Reception refers to the year 1495, when the corpus iuriscivilis was accepted in the Holy Roman Empire as the common law <strong>of</strong> last resortand imperial appellate jurisdiction was introduced with the establishment <strong>of</strong> theReichskammergericht (Imperial Supreme Court). On the other hand, the tradition<strong>of</strong> local jurisdiction had produced immeasurable legal variety in the secular laws <strong>of</strong>the Empire. On the other hand, as classical canon law was invalidated by municipallegal reformations, the Empire would have been left without a law held in commonacross communities, and this also explains why Roman law became the source <strong>of</strong> theius commune (law held in common).The Reception <strong>of</strong> Roman Law accompanied the Landfriede settlement <strong>of</strong> the1495 Concordat at Worms, which was supposed to put an end to the violent resolution<strong>of</strong> territorial disputes within the Empire and demanded that future disputes beadjudicated in imperial courts <strong>of</strong> law. Obviously, the peace <strong>of</strong> the land was disruptedby the religious wars associated with the Reformation, and, while Luther and Melanchthoninitially criticized the reception <strong>of</strong> a foreign law code, in the face <strong>of</strong> theviolence associated with the peasant revolts <strong>of</strong> the 1520s, they soon conceded thatit was a necessary expedient in the absence <strong>of</strong> a rationalized <strong>German</strong> common law.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!