Making of a German Constitution : a Slow Revolution

214 • The Making of a German Constitution32. Ibid., p. 156.33. Ibid.34. Heinrich Triepel, Die Kompetenzen des Bundesstaats und die geschriebeneVerfassung (1908); Paul Laband, Staatsrecht (1906); and Paul Laband, ‘Diegeschichtliche Entwicklung der Reichsverfassung seit der Reichsgründung’,Jahrbuch des öffentlichen Rechts, 1 (1907), pp. 1–46.35. Pflanze, Bismarck, pp. 149–50.36. Georg Jellinek, Verfassungsänderung und Verfassungswandlung (1906), inArthur Jacobson and Bernhard Schlink (eds), Weimar: A Jurisprudence of Crisis(2000), p. 54.37. ‘The 1871 Constitution of the German Empire’, in Elmar Hucko (ed.), TheDemocratic Tradition: Four German Constitutions (1987).38. Ernst Huber, Deutsche Verfassungsgeschichte seit 1789: Bismarck und dasReich, vol. 3, 3rd ed. (1988), p. 773.39. Ibid., p. 774.40. Ibid.41. ‘1871 Constitution’.42. Laband, Staatsrecht, cited in Huber, Deutsche Verfassungsgeschichte, vol. 3,p. 814.43. Cited in Giles MacDonogh, The Last Kaiser: William the Impetuous (2000),p. 199.44. MacDonogh, Last Kaiser, p. 208.45. Ibid., pp. 197–8.46. Ibid.47. Ibid., pp. 186 and 224.48. Ibid., pp. 186–8 and 224–5.49. Benjamin Hett, ‘The “Captain of Köpenick” and the Transformation of GermanCriminal Justice 1891–1914’, Central European History, 36/1 (2003), p. 6.50. Ibid.51. Ibid., p. 9.52. Kenneth Ledford, ‘Lawyers, Liberalism and Procedure: The German ImperialJustice Laws of 1877–79’, Central European History, 26 (1993); and Hett,“Captain of Köpenick”.53. Huber, Deutsche Verfassungsgeschichte, vol. 3, p. 841.54. For this paragraph I am indebted to the important work of Hett, “Captain ofKöpenick”, pp. 10–15.55. MacDonogh, Last Kaiser, p. 206.56. Roderick McLean, ‘Kaiser Wilhelm II and His Hessian Cousins: Intra-state Relationsin the German Empire and International Dynastic Politics 1890–1918’,German History, 19/1 (2001), pp. 40–1.57. Ibid.58. Ibid.