THE RUDOLF REPORT

GERMAR RUDOLF · THE RUDOLF REPORTforcement bars, they lack regularshape, have no straight edges andcorners (as is to be expected forregular, planned-in holes), no tracesof plaster (as is to be expected ifholes were chiseled in later), notraces of chimney extensions to leadthese stacks through the soil, notraces of anchoring devices (rawlplugs, hoop irons, dovetails…). Inhis schematic drawing of the roof,Provan even possesses the boldnessto display these cracks as holes withregular shapes. 267 C. Mattogno haspointed out in detail how unfoundedand distorted Provan’s claims reallyare. 268Finally, I want to focus on thoselegendary “Zyklon B introductioncolumns” for which Michal Kula isthe most frequently quoted ‘eye witness’.He gives a detailed descriptionof these columns which heclaimed he had built. 269 J.-C. Pressac270 (see Fig. 54) and Prof. vanPelt 271 have prepared drawings ofthese columns based on Kula’s description.Firstly, there neither existsmaterial nor documentary evidencethat these columns existed. 268 All weFig. 54: J.-C. Pressac’s drawingof the legendary “Zyklon Bintroduction columns” asdescribed by Michal Kula. 270Fig. 55: Handwritten entries in aninventory list of crematorium II formorgue 2. The lower one reads“Holzblenden” (wooden blinds).Can anybody guess what the upperone means? 195267 Ibid., p. 36.268 Carlo Mattogno, op. cit. (note 262).269 Höß trial, vol. 2, pp. 99-100.270 J.-C. Pressac, op. cit. (note 67), p. 487; on p. 287, Pressac shows a rather primitive drawingwith French inscriptions, probably prepared by a former French inmate on request of the Sovietinvestigation commission right after the war.271 R. van Pelt, op. cit. (note 69), pp. 194, 208; caveat emptor: Though van Pelt’s translation ofKula’s testimony is erroneous, and though the data supplied in Kula’s testimony is rathermeager, van Pelt uses it to make five different, very detailed drawings—some of it necessarilybased on van Pelt’s fantasy, and the rest based on Kula’s fantasy.130